Intergraph has come through for those of us Cyrix processors.ICR2
is stunning!Go to http://www.racesimcentral.net/
drivers link.Got it to run last night on my P166+.Intergraph's
tech support is outstanding,thanks guys.Also thank you Eric Busch
for your informative posts about the Reactor.
Later,
RJ
> Intergraph has come through for those of us Cyrix processors.ICR2
> is stunning!Go to http://intergraph.com/ics/reactor and follow the
> drivers link.Got it to run last night on my P166+.Intergraph's
> tech support is outstanding,thanks guys.Also thank you Eric Busch
> for your informative posts about the Reactor.
> Later,
> RJ
John
--
+++++++++++++++++++++
Visit the New Ohio Business Directory at:
http://www.adgrafix.com/jvoznak/index.html
Need a web site??? Visit mine at: http://www.adgrafix.com/info/jvoznak
How about some Common Sense??? http://www.netcom.com/~jvoznak
I downloaded the patch last night and it works great but for couple of
issues. Number one, I can't run indyfast. I have a new SuperMicro
motherboard and can't imagine that it doesn't support DMA mode so I'm
hoping this is a Cyrix issue. Number two, the lap count in all the
races is coming up on the order of 6 million laps. I've checked the
track.txt files and the lap counts are correct in the files, but
slightly <g> off in the game.
So if anyone running this on a Cyrix has been able to run INDYFAST
sucessfully I would appreciate a post stating that. I would also like
to know if other Cyrix owners are having the lap count problem that I
am experiencing.
Aside from these to items this game is stunning on the Verite! The
graphics have to be seen to be believed!
------------------------
Chris Drake
So how long does it take to run that many laps ? <G>
Seriously, I don't want to flame the Cyrix guys, it's a
sad situation how Cyrix has come close, but not close enough
for many of us. I am upgrading my PC and was very seriously
considering the C166+ this past month. However, the reports
on Usenet, particularly the (continuing) incompatabilities
with ICR2-3D have made my decision for me. I'll spend a few
bucks more for a lowly P133, instead of a C166+. :( I want
to thank guys like Chris for making these problems known. I
might be spending more $ and getting less HP with the Pentium,
but I'd be unhappy with the Cyrix incompatabilities, and its
better to know that up front.
Pick one or more: Model Rockets (competition-NERCB) / PCs (even Atari!) /
Papyrus ICR-ICR2-NCR / Who needs a life when you have multiple non-lives?
I don't know, but I'll need someone to hire new pit crews, I think
they will die from old age before the race is over :-)
> Seriously, I don't want to flame the Cyrix guys, it's a
>sad situation how Cyrix has come close, but not close enough
>for many of us. I am upgrading my PC and was very seriously
>considering the C166+ this past month. However, the reports
>on Usenet, particularly the (continuing) incompatabilities
>with ICR2-3D have made my decision for me. I'll spend a few
>bucks more for a lowly P133, instead of a C166+. :( I want
>to thank guys like Chris for making these problems known. I
>might be spending more $ and getting less HP with the Pentium,
>but I'd be unhappy with the Cyrix incompatabilities, and its
>better to know that up front.
>Pick one or more: Model Rockets (competition-NERCB) / PCs (even Atari!) /
>Papyrus ICR-ICR2-NCR / Who needs a life when you have multiple non-lives?
