: I watched a replay of the Australian GP last night and I have a few
: questions for the die-hard F1 fans out there.
: 1.) Why, when the two stewart cars had problems on the grid, did they abort
: the start? You can't get started? See you next event...(very NASCAR
: mentality I realize, but I don't understand)
The F1 cars accelerate much quicker than NASCARs if someone stalls on
the grid then there is potential for an extremely *** accident.
Indeed there have been fatalities in F1 this way. The F1 cars can
be doing a hundred mph after not very many car lengths - certainly
in the length of the grid.
: 2.) How did Schumacher, Michael, get screwed? He couldn't go anywhere on the
: first start because of the stalled car in front of him.
He had clutch problems getting started. The car in front of him
wasn't stalled (Mika Hakkinen). F1 cars don't have starters so he had
to be pushed off. F1 rules state that on the parade lap (where Schumi
had his problem) you can regain your grid place if you get off before
everyone has gone past (this happened to Mika) but not if everyone has
passed you before you start (as happened to Michael).
: 3.) Why only 58 laps, kind of short for months and months of preperation...?
Traditional - each race is approximately the same length. (I think
it's 200km - can't remember the exact distance). Remember also that
F1 courses are much longer than ovals. 200 laps of most F1 courses
would mean a 5-6 hour race.
: 4.) I guess I just don't understand why F1 insists on using standing starts
The standing start is a great test of skill. Some drivers are
brilliant at it (Coulthard, Alesi) and some aren't. It's dangerous
I suppose but for a lot of spectators it is the most exciting part
of the race.
--
Richard G. Clegg Only the mind is waving
Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.
www: http://www.racesimcentral.net/