rec.autos.simulators

F1 question...

Superdav

F1 question...

by Superdav » Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:00:00

I have only recently - last year or so - really got into F1. The cars seem
truly amazing. Though, I'm told that you must hear the V-10 in person to
really appreciate the tech involved. 10 cylinders, 17K RPM's. Television
doesn't do it justice? And though I do enjoy F12K, the sounds are pitiful.

Watching qualifying Sunday for Silverstone, the announcer made a comment
about " cutting the wires " . I have to assume he means driver aids? I had
though that things like ABS and traction control were ruled out long ago. Is
this not true?

I seem to remember a comment about the Honda Turbos having a complete data
uplinks package, so that anywhere in the world where the race is run, all
the on-board telemetry was being sent back to Japan. Then, as the race went
on, Honda could adjust the cars as they changed due to tire wear, lightened
fuel load, etc. Wasn't the banning of all this tech done to reduce the cost
of running a F1 team?

Just what driver aids are still used in the car?

And, a game using cars for the Turbo Era would seem really cool in my book.

Many thanks.


         http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Alan Orto

F1 question...

by Alan Orto » Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:00:00

The driving aids were banned but people have been cheating I guess. I
don't think they banned them to lower the cost of racing. I think they
did it because the cars were becoming so easy to drive that there was no
driver skill involved. If anything it probably raised the cost of racing
as more R&D was spent to find ways around the rules. They say teams were
hiding Traction Control modules in thier pit Speed limiters. Who knows.

> I have only recently - last year or so - really got into F1. The cars seem
> truly amazing. Though, I'm told that you must hear the V-10 in person to
> really appreciate the tech involved. 10 cylinders, 17K RPM's. Television
> doesn't do it justice? And though I do enjoy F12K, the sounds are pitiful.

> Watching qualifying Sunday for Silverstone, the announcer made a comment
> about " cutting the wires " . I have to assume he means driver aids? I had
> though that things like ABS and traction control were ruled out long ago. Is
> this not true?

> I seem to remember a comment about the Honda Turbos having a complete data
> uplinks package, so that anywhere in the world where the race is run, all
> the on-board telemetry was being sent back to Japan. Then, as the race went
> on, Honda could adjust the cars as they changed due to tire wear, lightened
> fuel load, etc. Wasn't the banning of all this tech done to reduce the cost
> of running a F1 team?

> Just what driver aids are still used in the car?

> And, a game using cars for the Turbo Era would seem really cool in my book.

> Many thanks.


>          http://www.cushdrive.com/

m.seer

F1 question...

by m.seer » Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:00:00

. They say teams were

In order to combat this, speed sensors are now required to be placed on the
front wheels. Owing to the fact that a F1 car is rear wheel drive, it is now
not possible to detect wheelspin. In theory that is at least!

MS

Greg Cisk

F1 question...

by Greg Cisk » Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:00:00


It is true. However this race was supposed to ban the rev limiters
and make the drivers keep at 60kph in the pits. The drivers complained
that this was too unsafe, so FIA reversed it's rev limiter ruling. The
problem is that some teams were cheating and using the rev limiter
technology on the race track as a form of traction control. Remember
a few races ago when that Mclaren accidentally had it's fuel lid open?
What the hell was that all about? Obviously traction control...

When traction control is enabled, the fuel cover springs open. As
and added measure, the FIA made all the teams activate their
rear tail light when they are using traction control. So if you see
a car with it's fuel cover open and the tail light on, and the car
is not in the pits... Well then they are some cheating bastards :-)

As for cut tires? I always thought that meant the tires were
punctured ala Nascar or Cart racing.

--

Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

Bruce Kennewel

F1 question...

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Current thinking is towards introducing manual gear selection...with a gear
lever, not flicking a paddle.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------


> The driving aids were banned but people have been cheating I guess. I
> don't think they banned them to lower the cost of racing. I think they
> did it because the cars were becoming so easy to drive that there was no
> driver skill involved. If anything it probably raised the cost of racing
> as more R&D was spent to find ways around the rules. They say teams were
> hiding Traction Control modules in thier pit Speed limiters. Who knows.


> > I have only recently - last year or so - really got into F1. The cars
seem
> > truly amazing. Though, I'm told that you must hear the V-10 in person to
> > really appreciate the tech involved. 10 cylinders, 17K RPM's. Television
> > doesn't do it justice? And though I do enjoy F12K, the sounds are
pitiful.

> > Watching qualifying Sunday for Silverstone, the announcer made a comment
> > about " cutting the wires " . I have to assume he means driver aids? I
had
> > though that things like ABS and traction control were ruled out long
ago. Is
> > this not true?

> > I seem to remember a comment about the Honda Turbos having a complete
data
> > uplinks package, so that anywhere in the world where the race is run,
all
> > the on-board telemetry was being sent back to Japan. Then, as the race
went
> > on, Honda could adjust the cars as they changed due to tire wear,
lightened
> > fuel load, etc. Wasn't the banning of all this tech done to reduce the
cost
> > of running a F1 team?

> > Just what driver aids are still used in the car?

> > And, a game using cars for the Turbo Era would seem really cool in my
book.

> > Many thanks.


> >          http://www.cushdrive.com/

Bern

F1 question...

by Bern » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Active suspension and traction control was banned in 94. The form of
traction control was that the engine automatically lowered revs when
wheelspin occurred. Of course it is now belived that all the top teams have
different forms of tractions control and depending on how you interperet the
vauge rules they are legal.

Ive been thinking a turbo era game would be cool since I saw a 85 race at
monaco. There was actually a lot of overtaking!!! At monaco no less....

Berno


> I have only recently - last year or so - really got into F1. The cars seem
> truly amazing. Though, I'm told that you must hear the V-10 in person to
> really appreciate the tech involved. 10 cylinders, 17K RPM's. Television
> doesn't do it justice? And though I do enjoy F12K, the sounds are pitiful.

> Watching qualifying Sunday for Silverstone, the announcer made a comment
> about " cutting the wires " . I have to assume he means driver aids? I had
> though that things like ABS and traction control were ruled out long ago.
Is
> this not true?

> I seem to remember a comment about the Honda Turbos having a complete data
> uplinks package, so that anywhere in the world where the race is run, all
> the on-board telemetry was being sent back to Japan. Then, as the race
went
> on, Honda could adjust the cars as they changed due to tire wear,
lightened
> fuel load, etc. Wasn't the banning of all this tech done to reduce the
cost
> of running a F1 team?

> Just what driver aids are still used in the car?

> And, a game using cars for the Turbo Era would seem really cool in my
book.

> Many thanks.


>          http://www.cushdrive.com/

Bruce Kennewel

F1 question...

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Perhaps. To me it is a moot point anyway, Dave, as I don't religiously
follow modern F1. But I thought it an interesting concept. Who knows...if
something like manual shifting can be dreamed up then all things are
possible.......no aero-aids, perhaps?!!
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------


cory ta

F1 question...

by cory ta » Sat, 29 Apr 2000 04:00:00

actually I feel that all those electronic control devices were wonderful in
their own right. I remember the lotus cars out cornering everyone with their
active suspension, & the williams hondas turbos blowing everyone out of the way.
They took a lot away from the driver at that time, with the car doing almost
everything. The main thing to note is that those expensive gadgets are now
common place in normal road cars. Without racing teams cracking their heads to
try & beat each other with technology, we won;t have the level of technology we
have today.

That said, I support anything that makes the sport more exciting, but traction
control is not one of them.
I oso favour larger wings. Since they cut the sizes of those things, we don't
really see exciting overtaking anymore.

m.seer

F1 question...

by m.seer » Sat, 29 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Cory

It's not the size of wings that has caused the lack of overtaking in F1. We
need more Mechanical Grip and LESS reliance on aerodynamic devices. The best
eras for overtaking were those where the following car could get into the
slipstream of the car behind and stay there on the entry of a corner without
washing away.
This is simply not possible as part of the norm in this day and age, where
the plank has severely reduced under car downforce and there is an even
greater reliance on wings and other appendages to produce grip. Just look at
how Schumacher languished in 8th place at Silverstone for lap after lap,
unable to do anything about the  car ahead, even though he was around 3-4
secs a lap faster. The days of barn door wings died with the turbo era. You
need to remember that in those days, cars had in excess of 1000 BHP in race
trim and over 1200 BHP in qualifying. They were able to utilise more
downforce because they had the additional power  to pull these things
through the air on the straights.

What we need is big fat slick tyres with mechanical of grip and more
progressive / less snappy performance on the edge of the envelope.

It's so sad to think that through the junior ranks of the sport, the
aspiring GP driver has to learn so many skills that used to be a
prerequisite for driving GP's only to have to throw them away now. Heeling
and toeing, driving with slicks, even manual shifting were all things that
seperated the great drivers from those who used to blow engines on a regular
basis. Nowadays, the best they can hope for is to have sufficient marketing
and political talents to enable them to get into a front of grid car. Very
rarely do you see a driver come from the back of the grid in a display of
inspiration simply because the cars do not allow it.

I feel sorry for the younger members of the F1 fan club. All they have are
the archives and stories of how it was.......

MS

.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.