rec.autos.simulators

Soon Negative at Monster GPL Rank ... thoughts

Sébastien Tixie

Soon Negative at Monster GPL Rank ... thoughts

by Sébastien Tixie » Wed, 04 Jul 2001 23:15:13

hi !

For some days now, i'm working on my Monster GPL Rank...

I've put 4 chassis negatives in all tracks : Lotus, Eagle, Ferrari and
Brahbam ( except Brahbam at Kyalami and Spa for some tenth :o( ).

Anyway  , after that i have retried to beat my PB at Kyalami and Zandvort,
and i have quite easily ( 10 laps by tracks ) beat them ... 1:20.13 ->
1:19.87 at Kyalami and 1:25.5x -> 1:24.97 at zandvort...

I'd like too know if for you too guys, the Lotus seems easier to drive after
manage to made some almost decent times with the Honda,Cooper and BRM ;o)

regards,
--
Sebastien TIXIER - Game Developer
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
GPLRank Normal:-42.52 Monster:+7.52

Dave Henri

Soon Negative at Monster GPL Rank ... thoughts

by Dave Henri » Wed, 04 Jul 2001 23:22:55

  i would think it's the seat time, as well as the different marks.  you
might have picked up a few habits controlling the Lotus that you couldn't
use with the other cars, now that you've tried the Green Meanie again, it
seems easier.
  See?  It's all in the head...that's why I suck at GPL !!
dave henrie


1. GPL Rank - Objective : negative handicap

2. GPL Rank Negative Woohoo!!

3. Woohoo, I got a negative GPL Rank tonight :)

4. Negative rank with GPL and default setups

5. Help with Monster rank (GPL)

6. Negative ranking - finally!

7. Another Yank with a negative rank !

8. Negative bitmaps in GPL! (grapic disturbance in GPL!)

9. GPL laptimes & GPL rank?

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.