rec.autos.simulators

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

Kham0

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Kham0 » Sun, 12 Jan 1997 04:00:00

I have noticed that anyone who posts a negative comment about NASCAR2 gets
flamed. I didn't know this was the PR board for Sierra. Are we afraid of
offending our Papyrus buddies?  Well, I loved the original Nascar game. It
was unique in that it brought a lot of non-game players to the computer
because of their love of NASCAR.  But, IMHO, I am very disappointed with
NASCAR2. Graphics excluded, the engine is demanding (too demanding...many
people can get better frame rates with the old game), many options were
left on the cutting room floor,
many gamers can't get proper sound, NO SAVE OPTION, the mouse interface is
crap, the paintkit interface is still a pain, and for a lot of us, it
crashes as much as it runs when we move from menu to menu.

It was rushed to market, for Christmas. And Sierra wants your money. It's
about $$$$. And whatever goodwill Papyrus developed with it's consumer
base, Seirra flushed away with the release of this bug-riddled game. And
before someone starts whining about a PATCH coming, two points.  1. Who
says every gamer has access to the internet to download the patch..... 2.
Why do computer gamers settle for less than perfect when they purchase a
product. Patch? When you buy a new car...and the brakes don't work...do
you say "it's OK, a patch is coming in a couple months."

A lot of consumers don't come back when the software industry gives them
the shaft. And this "Patch" attitude reinforces shoddy workmanship.  I
wanted NASCAR2 to be great, I loved the original game and the sport. But
it's not!!  And kissing Papyrus/Sierra's ass doesn't make things better!

I'll remember NASCAR2 the next time I'm at the store and about to purchase
some software. If the side of the box reads "Seirra", I'll put it back.  

ITS THE ONLY OPTION I HAVE!

If you purchased NASCAR2 and it works perfectly, I'm happy for you. But a
lot of us aren't so lucky. And we shouldn't have to invest $2,000.00 to
get a $50.00 game to work (as advertised).  And most inportantly, WE ARE
ENTITLED OUR OWN OPINION!

Flame me. I'm busying watching my screen freeze as I move from menu to
menu in NASCAR2!

Bruno Amar

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Bruno Amar » Sun, 12 Jan 1997 04:00:00

Well said.



corn

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by corn » Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:00:00

Ok..I'll flame you....

Take it back and shut up.

This is not the complaints department.

Send all complaints direct to Sierra.

Maybe your crappy computer cannot handle next-gen software like Nascar2?

Sell your 386DX and get a real computer. Maybe you'll get better
frame-rates. Then again, maybe not. I doubt you would know what to do
with a P200.

My opinion is that you are a big cry-baby.

Again, take Nascar2 back and shut the hell up.

cornhole


> I have noticed that anyone who posts a negative comment about NASCAR2 gets
> flamed. I didn't know this was the PR board for Sierra. Are we afraid of
> offending our Papyrus buddies?  Well, I loved the original Nascar game. It
> was unique in that it brought a lot of non-game players to the computer
> because of their love of NASCAR.  But, IMHO, I am very disappointed with
> NASCAR2. Graphics excluded, the engine is demanding (too demanding...many
> people can get better frame rates with the old game), many options were
> left on the cutting room floor,
> many gamers can't get proper sound, NO SAVE OPTION, the mouse interface is
> crap, the paintkit interface is still a pain, and for a lot of us, it
> crashes as much as it runs when we move from menu to menu.

> It was rushed to market, for Christmas. And Sierra wants your money. It's
> about $$$$. And whatever goodwill Papyrus developed with it's consumer
> base, Seirra flushed away with the release of this bug-riddled game. And
> before someone starts whining about a PATCH coming, two points.  1. Who
> says every gamer has access to the internet to download the patch..... 2.
> Why do computer gamers settle for less than perfect when they purchase a
> product. Patch? When you buy a new car...and the brakes don't work...do
> you say "it's OK, a patch is coming in a couple months."

> A lot of consumers don't come back when the software industry gives them
> the shaft. And this "Patch" attitude reinforces shoddy workmanship.  I
> wanted NASCAR2 to be great, I loved the original game and the sport. But
> it's not!!  And kissing Papyrus/Sierra's ass doesn't make things better!

> I'll remember NASCAR2 the next time I'm at the store and about to purchase
> some software. If the side of the box reads "Seirra", I'll put it back.

> ITS THE ONLY OPTION I HAVE!

> If you purchased NASCAR2 and it works perfectly, I'm happy for you. But a
> lot of us aren't so lucky. And we shouldn't have to invest $2,000.00 to
> get a $50.00 game to work (as advertised).  And most inportantly, WE ARE
> ENTITLED OUR OWN OPINION!

> Flame me. I'm busying watching my screen freeze as I move from menu to
> menu in NASCAR2!

Bruce Kennewel

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Bruce Kennewel » Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:00:00

(snip)
(unsnip)

Exactly right........which is why most of us who bought it love the game
regardless of the glitches.

--

BruceK

Bruno Amar

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Bruno Amar » Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:00:00

What's your problem man. The guy is just expressing his own opinion of
the game. It's idiots like you that ruin these newsgroups for all of us
'normal' people.

And just for your info - I HAVE GOT A P200 with a Rendition video card
and at some tracks the frame rate is still unacceptable.


> Ok..I'll flame you....

> Take it back and shut up.

> This is not the complaints department.

> Send all complaints direct to Sierra.

> Maybe your crappy computer cannot handle next-gen software like Nascar2?

> Sell your 386DX and get a real computer. Maybe you'll get better
> frame-rates. Then again, maybe not. I doubt you would know what to do
> with a P200.

> My opinion is that you are a big cry-baby.

> Again, take Nascar2 back and shut the hell up.

> cornhole


> > I have noticed that anyone who posts a negative comment about NASCAR2 gets
> > flamed. I didn't know this was the PR board for Sierra. Are we afraid of
> > offending our Papyrus buddies?  Well, I loved the original Nascar game. It
> > was unique in that it brought a lot of non-game players to the computer
> > because of their love of NASCAR.  But, IMHO, I am very disappointed with
> > NASCAR2. Graphics excluded, the engine is demanding (too demanding...many
> > people can get better frame rates with the old game), many options were
> > left on the cutting room floor,
> > many gamers can't get proper sound, NO SAVE OPTION, the mouse interface is
> > crap, the paintkit interface is still a pain, and for a lot of us, it
> > crashes as much as it runs when we move from menu to menu.

> > It was rushed to market, for Christmas. And Sierra wants your money. It's
> > about $$$$. And whatever goodwill Papyrus developed with it's consumer
> > base, Seirra flushed away with the release of this bug-riddled game. And
> > before someone starts whining about a PATCH coming, two points.  1. Who
> > says every gamer has access to the internet to download the patch..... 2.
> > Why do computer gamers settle for less than perfect when they purchase a
> > product. Patch? When you buy a new car...and the brakes don't work...do
> > you say "it's OK, a patch is coming in a couple months."

> > A lot of consumers don't come back when the software industry gives them
> > the shaft. And this "Patch" attitude reinforces shoddy workmanship.  I
> > wanted NASCAR2 to be great, I loved the original game and the sport. But
> > it's not!!  And kissing Papyrus/Sierra's ass doesn't make things better!

Jim Sokolo

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Jim Sokolo » Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:00:00



Are you using DMA? If so, I can't imagine why your framerate would not
be acceptable (perhaps except at Martinsville)... If you're not using
DMA, that's the problem right there...

---Jim Sokoloff, Papyrus

Bruno Amar

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Bruno Amar » Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:00:00

Hmm.... maybe I'm wrong but it sounds like you too are whining!!!!


good..

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by good.. » Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:00:00


> I have noticed that anyone who posts a negative comment about NASCAR2 gets
> flamed. I didn't know this was the PR board for Sierra. Are we afraid of
> offending our Papyrus buddies?  Well, I loved the original Nascar game. It
> was unique in that it brought a lot of non-game players to the computer
> because of their love of NASCAR.  But, IMHO, I am very disappointed with
> NASCAR2. Graphics excluded, the engine is demanding (too demanding...many
> people can get better frame rates with the old game), many options were
> left on the cutting room floor,
> many gamers can't get proper sound, NO SAVE OPTION, the mouse interface is
> crap, the paintkit interface is still a pain, and for a lot of us, it
> crashes as much as it runs when we move from menu to menu.

        Hear, Hear...  I agree 100%.  Since when did the people decide it's ok
to take shoddy ANYTHING!  It's just like politics too many people think
"oh thats
just the way it is"  I say BULL%*&^, there is no reason ANY company
should be
able to release poor qualitiy workmanship, no matter what the product.  
Unfortunately computer software is one of the worst areas for this exact
thing.
Take a look at Windows 95.  Shipped with how many known bugs?  And yes I
know all
the arguments, it's so hard to program things for ump*** million
machine combos,
it's this, it's that...  Well no one ever said things were easy, if you
can't stand
the heat get out of the kitchen.
        I also agree there should be no reason for flaming someone for posting
their
feelings and gripes.  Maybe if more people shared their true feelings
instead of the
old "There's a patch coming" then the software companies would get the
idea and make
things right the first time.
corn

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by corn » Tue, 14 Jan 1997 04:00:00

The guy is an idiot. He is expressing his complaints AND WHINING LIKE A
BABY. That is not an opinion. I suppose that when a 2 year old stomps
around and screams at the top of his lungs because he can't have a
cookie then you would say that is his opinion.  The kid needs slapped a
few times. And it is idiots like this that remind me of 2-year old
brats.  And if I can flame these idiots for doing so, then so much the
better.

Every normal person knows that Nascar2 is the premiere racing sim bar
none. It is idiots like you and a few others who have the biggest
mouths.

I've decided to stand up for Sierra because Nascar2 is a dream come true
for me. I really don't know where all these "bugs" are coming from which
a few of you claim to be experiencing. Maybe your hardware is just crap.

Anymore, if a guy gets cut off by Darrel Waltrip #17 on Talledega, it's
got to be a bug! It's a bug! Fix it! WWWAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!


> What's your problem man. The guy is just expressing his own opinion of
> the game. It's idiots like you that ruin these newsgroups for all of us
> 'normal' people.

> And just for your info - I HAVE GOT A P200 with a Rendition video card
> and at some tracks the frame rate is still unacceptable.

Tom Hanse

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by Tom Hanse » Tue, 14 Jan 1997 04:00:00

Yes - Martinsville requires the stands to be turned off in order to race.
I have looked at the 3DO for martinsville and am at a loss as to why the
this track is so demanding.  I do uinderstand that the tight turns at
Martinsville requires recalculation of the 3D view very quickly - but still
I cannot explain the poor frame rates coming off the turns.  I run a P200,
Reactor with dma and dma scores at 75-78 mbytes.  Tracks like Dover produce
excellent graphics detail and frame rates.
/THansen





> >And just for your info - I HAVE GOT A P200 with a Rendition video card
> >and at some tracks the frame rate is still unacceptable.

> Are you using DMA? If so, I can't imagine why your framerate would not
> be acceptable (perhaps except at Martinsville)... If you're not using
> DMA, that's the problem right there...

> ---Jim Sokoloff, Papyrus

an..

Sierra/Papyrus...thanks..for nothing!

by an.. » Tue, 14 Jan 1997 04:00:00


>I have noticed that anyone who posts a negative comment about NASCAR2 gets
>flamed. I didn't know this was the PR board for Sierra. Are we afraid of
>offending our Papyrus buddies?  Well, I loved the original Nascar game. It
>was unique in that it brought a lot of non-game players to the computer
>because of their love of NASCAR.  

I commend Papyrus for even paying attention to the Newsgroups.
Especially the ***they tolorate... (even from me)
You don't see support from 90% of the software companies out there.

I agree with some things being left out of the sim. I'd be interested
to know what kind of system your trying to push NASCAR 2 on tho'.
Your descibing problems that the majority of users don't seem to be
having trouble with.

Yes, right or wrong, that's why it's a business...
Sierra will never score very high in my book for their Marketing
tactics tho'.

I don't believe that All use "Driver's" are going to storm Papyrus'
office with pitchforks and torches because of Horrible management by
Sierra.

A few points....

1) How many pieces of software do you know of that are released
"Bug-Free"?? Maybe if the huddled mass's hadn't complained  about
the release date not being "soon enough" a couple of the obvious bug's
wouldn't be there.  Who knows??

2) No Net access? Well.... I guess they need to make sure they send in
that little card that comes with the software. "Product Registration"?

If you feel like you "Got the shaft" you really should just consider
taking the software back to the place you got it from.

Yea upgrading to keep up with the latest games is both expensive as
well as a real drag. But that's the way it is with this stuff. As the
old NASCAR calander here reads..... "If ya can't run with the big
dogs... stay off the porch!"

Still sounds like a Hardware problem to me!

Hope things work out for you :)
Andy


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.