Direct X API's?
Thanx
DC
Thanx
DC
Rick Genter
Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
Sierra On-Line, Inc.
>Rick Genter
>Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
>Sierra On-Line, Inc.
Can we expect better framerates with Windows95 supported
Soundcards, Video, ect... as compared to Dos? I currently have no
knowledge as to what Direct.....(ect...) support actually means.
Thanks,
Ron
> Can we expect better framerates with Windows95 supported
>Soundcards, Video, ect... as compared to Dos? I currently have no
>knowledge as to what Direct.....(ect...) support actually means.
>Thanks,
>Ron
Rick Genter
Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
Sierra On-Line, Inc.
Rick,
If I have DirectX compliant drivers (Diamond 3240) and plenty of
memory will the new Win95 version run faster than the current DOS
version.
Thanks,
Anthony Kent
310HP 96 Z28 SS #1030
>> Can we expect better framerates with Windows95 supported
>>Soundcards, Video, ect... as compared to Dos? I currently have no
>>knowledge as to what Direct.....(ect...) support actually means.
>>Thanks,
>>Ron
>It depends. The video and sound companies are all working on the DirectX
>support, so keep up with their latest driver releases.
>Rick Genter
>Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing II
>Sierra On-Line, Inc.
If I have DirectX compliant drivers (Diamond 3240) and plenty of
memory will the new Win95 version run faster than the current DOS
version.
Is that a Diamond Stealth 64 Video VRAM? If it is, and the new Win95
version is even as FAST as the DOS version, LET ME KNOW! My experience
with 3 sets of drivers and 2 versions of DirectX were not encouraging.
Frame rates were 1-5 fps slower in Win95.
Randy