and I am still having problems running full graphics (even in the VGA mode).
drb
drb
I have seen DX-120 motherboards for as little as $150. I want to get one
soon...
\|\_|\__/| |
/||_| \/ |/\|
* JABBER v1.1 *
--
| Fidonet: Dave Henrie 1:346/25
| Fido -> Internet/Usenet via Net 346 Services
.
Path: cnn.isc-br.com!tau-ceti!nwfocus.wa.com!nwestnews.nwest.mccaw.com!usenet
Newsgroups: seattle.general
Subject: Re: Why Hemp isn't legal... or Why *** are sold on shelves and not grown in your yard.
Date: 15 Nov 1995 16:14:13 GMT
Organization: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Lines: 47
NNTP-Posting-Host: scoobee.nwest.mccaw.com
writes:
(With deletions...)
[The Kennedys and DuPonts]
*** was banned as an ingredient in non-prescription *** and
patent medicines (like Coca Cola) by the pure food and drug act of
(correct me if I have the year wrong) 1914. This was some decades
before the lifting of Prohibition. Also, Coca Cola did not contain
*** as a direct ingredient. It contained (and still does) coca
leaf extracts, mainly for flavor, which in its earlier formulations
may have contained enough trace *** turn up in a modern-day drug
test. Coca Cola, however, was never like Laudinum - a drug. By the
standards of its time and ours, the worst you could say about it is
that it was an extremely mild and benign patent medicine.
Joe Kennedy was a rogue, but I don't think you can pin the rap on
him for banning ***. I also think it's highly dubious to claim
that companies like DuPont had a hidden agenda for replacing hemp
products with petroleum products - they had a very open agenda.
They owned the patents. If people bought, say, Mylar fishing line
instead of hemp line, DuPont made money. Anybody could make hemp
line.
"Better things for better living, through Chemistry."
(Typical disclaimers.) . begin 644 daily186.gif
--
David Breneman
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Phone: +1-206-803-7362
.
Path: cnn.isc-br.com!krel.iea.com!nwfocus.wa.com!nwnews.wa.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!n
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.supermodels
Subject: Re: Turlington is too fat
Date: 14 Nov 1995 06:19:16 GMT
Organization: Cosmos
Lines: 18
NNTP-Posting-Host: port-2-13.access.one.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 16bit)
i agree with Josef totally, her face, and especially her mouth, is the
>The reason Turlie is THE Supermodel, and a "Supermodel" at all, is
>because of her extraordinary beauty. She does have the most
>hauntingly beautiful face in the world. She has ethereal looks, which
>are more sensuous than you would see in "the latest face". She's been
>at the top for so long for that reason alone, and will continue to be
>the most special of all models for an untold number for many years to
>come. It's hard to imagine that anyone can take their eyes off hers
>to complain about her legs. Whatever her thighs look like, no-one has
>a face like Christy's.
most sensuous in the world~!!! as for her legs, i happen to think
they're PERFECT (as is every other inch of the girl), i prefer something
substantial over the rail-thin legs you see on most fashion models, and
by the way, they are still slimmer than..say...cindy's or naomi's. but in
the end---to each his own, i believe that's the ticket~!
Path: cnn.isc-br.com!krel.iea.com!nwfocus.wa.com!nwnews.wa.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!n
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.misc
Subject: Art Comics Daily for Nov.13th (Bobby Ruckers) Time Travel Agency - daily186.gif (1/1)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 06:30:25 GMT
Lines: 545
NNTP-Posting-Host: artcomic.cais.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
<uuencoded_portion_removed>
.2WK2E*ZTI2]MF8```#M%
`
end