Too bad.... looks like I wont be buying any modern F1-sims for a long long
time then...
Guess that FIA / FOCA's loss then.
--
ed_
I think you answered your own question here.
-John
Does it work with F1 2K?
If you go over to HG, there is a ton of talk and e***ment about this
add-on.
Here? Nothing.
More evidence I guess (unfortunately) that r.a.s. is basically a club
headquarters for a certain sim.
David G Fisher
David G Fisher
> > Umm, what newsgroup have you been reading? Most here seem to own and
like
> > F12001 a lot.
> The one that had a few post about missing patches (or was that another
> F1-title?), crappy multiplayer-code and other things..
> > You'll have to get the FIA off the developers backs befoe you get a
modern
> > F1 sim with really good mp.
> Too bad.... looks like I wont be buying any modern F1-sims for a long
long
> time then...
> Guess that FIA / FOCA's loss then.
> --
> ed_
Because inhere you HAVE to love GPL. Any other sim is ***(Rally Trophy as
an exception), and if you don't see that, you're off! Just look at my
flaming of GLP some weeks ago!!
I have downloaded it, and besides a little troubble with the sound (see an
earlier thread) it is great. The Porche sound is too weak compared to Viper
and Ferrari, but that is just a matter of adjustment.
The cars though seems to be a little to much understeering, especially at
low speeds, and I miss a handbrake, :o), to force the rear around.
--
Mvh
Sven
David G Fisher
> > The physics aren't finalized yet, the AI needs some work, and there are
a
> > few bugs, but I'm still very surprised at seeing no reaction here to
this
> > add-on.
> > David G Fisher
> Because inhere you HAVE to love GPL. Any other sim is ***(Rally Trophy
as
> an exception), and if you don't see that, you're off! Just look at my
> flaming of GLP some weeks ago!!
> I have downloaded it, and besides a little troubble with the sound (see an
> earlier thread) it is great. The Porche sound is too weak compared to
Viper
> and Ferrari, but that is just a matter of adjustment.
> The cars though seems to be a little to much understeering, especially at
> low speeds, and I miss a handbrake, :o), to force the rear around.
> --
> Mvh
> Sven
Just a guess, but I'd bet most here are more interested in racing X sim
online than X sim offline.
-John
> Here? Nothing.
> More evidence I guess (unfortunately) that r.a.s. is basically a club
> headquarters for a certain sim.
> David G Fisher
> > > The physics aren't finalized yet, the AI needs some work, and there
are
> a
> > > few bugs,
> > I think you answered your own question here.
That was because you trolled on purpose under a different nickname
with a quite idiotic post, then denied the troll was you, then you
admitted it. Nothing wrong with a well-founded opinion, but the way
you posted here was quite sad. And you got some well deserved flaming
in return.
Andre
Like I said - this is/was *my impression* of how things are...
As stated before - I have not tested F2001 (or any other modern F1 sim for
that matter)
If a sim dont have proper online play, I wont even bother looking at it....
my time on this planet is short enough as it is....
--
ed_
Everyone likes a good arcade game now and then. Unfortunately,
Porsche Unleashed or Colin McRae 2.0 were more fun than driving around
flat tracks through multiple chicanes.
Can we get one with cars that handle realistically and also has
support for split axis controllers?
Jason
David G Fisher
Nice conclusion jumping :) I would still put the answer as "I have no
idea"
It generally amazes me how web-forums are way more popular to use than
newsgroups. I mean, there are around 200-300 posts per day here, but
probably tons more at legends central and high gear. What I don't get
is why people really want to use a user unfriendly system compared to
what newsgroups are with a proper newsreader. Or maybe it is a
demographic thing.
--
Olav K. Malmin
remove .spam when replying
> > It's 95% finished.
> > If you go over to HG, there is a ton of talk and e***ment about this
> > add-on.
> > Here? Nothing.
> > More evidence I guess (unfortunately) that r.a.s. is basically a club
> > headquarters for a certain sim.
> Nice conclusion jumping :) I would still put the answer as "I have no
> idea"
> It generally amazes me how web-forums are way more popular to use than
> newsgroups. I mean, there are around 200-300 posts per day here, but
> probably tons more at legends central and high gear. What I don't get
> is why people really want to use a user unfriendly system compared to
> what newsgroups are with a proper newsreader. Or maybe it is a
> demographic thing.
> --
> Olav K. Malmin
> remove .spam when replying
