rec.autos.simulators

I'm not telling anyone how to post. If i was that manical about it'd i'd run a
cancel bot.

er... casual... right...  if you want a look at a casual group, try most of
alt.* causal to the extent that no one is on topic.

Personally i wish all the morbid ***ers who get wood everytime there is some
kind of car crash and love to chat about it and download video's and *** off
at it and then slam arcade racers for high silly crash modes and the like are
self indulgent sicko's.

(you may notice, i object most to those crash releasted motorsport threads.
There is a point).

I wish you'd get laid, try your mum. She could suck a salami through a 12 foot
hose.
Z.

Please remove NOSPAM from my email address when replying.

I knew I should have tried a rational approach, but I didn't because I
saw others try it and it was futile with you. At least this is fun.

He-hee! Thanks for the sage info. Better than doing your mom, I guess.
That*** removal operation she had isn't too convincing.

Tim

Z.

Please remove NOSPAM from my email address when replying.

M

The point *I* was making, you ignorant ***, is that the post

That guy was suggesting nothing. He cut into this thread in an abrupt manner
and then tried dictating to people  in an extremely aggresive way - the
hypocryte that he is, posting off topic stuff himself elsewhere. There is a
subtle difference. You and him are one of a kind when it comes to
intelligence aren't you. You run out of capacity to applying logic at the
first hurdle and hence have to resort to common denominator vulgarity and
personal attacks.

Mark

p.s. Look what I just found.

Care to come and discuss this in rec.bad.marshalling.at.the.ring?

No, actually I haven't run out of "capacity to applying logic at the
first hurdle" at all, I just wasn't aware that your comment was a hurdle
nor intelligent. The use of profanity was as a punctuation to my comment
rather than the core. If you want to go back you'll find that this was
the first such comment I've made, thus it is hardly anything to make any
wild assumptions from.

Had you made an intelligent comment rather than a relatively unfunny one
liner I'd have created a more detailled response. As it was I felt it was
uneccesary.

Whatever your viewpoint, opinion or disagreement with the previous posts
was, you never made it at all clear. Perhaps if you had done I wouldn't
have replied in that tone.

Care to re-read the post you just took offence to? Perhaps you want to
read the bit where I said "Regardless of whether we do go off topic or
not from time to time, we shouldn't."? I go off topic, in fact I think
pretty much everyone here has at times.

Whatever... the point is a valid one. Can you tell me that you disagree
with people preferring on topic posting than off topic?

M

Which is about the most silly thing i've read all week. Congrads!

Z.

(who is not calling you an ignorant ***... just... ignorant..)

Please remove NOSPAM from my email address when replying.

sa
w

I don't disagree with this at all. My original reply to the guy was quite
civil when he butted in. His terse replies were what got my back up as well
as several other people's. I guess your input came at an inopportune time.
Feelings were running quite high and your comment just added fuel.

I think it is time for everyone to cool down and  call a day on this
pointless excercise.

Mark

*PLONK*

Mark

Tim

--
Wolfgang Preiss   \ E-mail copies of replies to this posting are welcome.