rec.autos.simulators

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 23 Feb 2000 04:00:00

In essence, Rafe, I go very slowly in comparison to the hot-shots out there
amongst you.
The 30/85 diff I use on the F2 (or, as I prefer to think of them, the 1.5
litre) class. Usually with 3 clutches.

--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------


> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:33:59 +1100, "Bruce Kennewell"

> >I'm curious.
> >How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the sim
> >will allow) suspension and diff settings?

> >(I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials at
> >either 45/85 or 30/85.  The diff settings really make for a hell of a
> >driving experience!!).

> I'm curious to know how you can handle a 30/85 diff!! I did a number
> of tests of various diff combinations at the Glen in the Lotus, trying
> to find what combination would allow correct differential action,
> whilst limiting inside rear spin and without going too far to outside
> rear spin. The best setting should allow the inside rear to spin only
> just before the outside, to stop the rear end sliding out. I found
> that 30 deg. would only allow 1 clutch before the rear was mostly
> locked. 45 was also only 1, and 60 was about 2. However 85 degrees
> allows a big tuning potential, since you really need 6 clutches to
> fully lock up the outside rear, or only 2 or 3 for a spinning inside
> wheel. That is why the 85 diff is so popular. There just isn't any
> room to adjust with the 60 deg. diff. 3 is too much, 2 is too little.
> At least that is what I found.

> I've tried the same as you in the name of historical settings and what
> seemed more "correct", but the bottom line is that in gpl they don't
> work very well, at least in terms of driveability. I congratulate you
> on being able to control these bastards with those settings, but how
> do you go around Monaco???? Also, how many clutches do you use? How
> quick are the cars using your setups?

> Rafe Mc

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Leo Landma

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Leo Landma » Wed, 23 Feb 2000 04:00:00



> the drivers of '67
> should have been using different setups.....

Hehe... only IF those drivers were immortal, had unlimited funds to
replace cars, unlimited time to practice (or a Shift+R option :-).

In real life they had only a few hours of practice, one car, one life.
So they went for a setup that was safe for a 2 hour or 300 km race. It's
a ***y miracle they were as fast as they were!

--
Bye,
Leo

Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 23 Feb 2000 04:00:00

"History was wrong"???!!!

Ummmm...okay then.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------


> Besides: I historical correctness means setups that is slower, and GPL
> models handling accurately, then history was wrong; the drivers of '67
> should have been using different setups.....

> Jon





> > > (I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials at
> > > either 45/85 or 30/85.

> > Bruce, I sympathize with your attitude. But (you guessed this was
> > coming) when racing online my competitive instincts take over, and I go
> > for the quickest setup - realistic or not. Maybe it's time for a GPL
> > Classic league...

> > Problem is, what settings are historically accurate? How do you know
> > what they were using in those days?

> > --
> > Bye,
> > Leo

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 23 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Why would you want to look at Graham's book? He finished behind Clark.

I'd rather talk to Jim's mechanic.

--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------



> > It was only ever "tweaked" twice during the season and one of those
> > tweaks was reversed.

> Actually, both were reversed, according to Mr. Oliver :-)
> But he was talking about the changes made by the driver. The team
(probably
> Mr. Chapman) adapted ride height, spring rates etc. for each track.

> Graham Hill on the other hand changed a lot of settings AND kept
meticulous
> records of all values. Now if we could just have a look in that book...

> Bye,
> Leo

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Mark Seer

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Mark Seer » Wed, 23 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Wrong Bruce.
There was another change to his car. Jim was very light on his brakes whilst
Hill was something of an animal. They had to put a new set of pads on Hill's
car after every race. It was reported that they changed Clark's pads half
way through the season because the mechanics were getting embarrased about
not having to do so. By all accounts, those removed, would have done for the
rest of the year.

MS

> An interesting fact regarding Jim Clark and the Lotus he used in 1967.  It
> was only ever "tweaked" twice during the season and one of those tweaks
was
> reversed (the toe-in was changed by a third of a degree or something like
> that.  He didn't like the handling change so it was changed back for the
> next race!)

> Pity that the "authentic movement" has faded out.

> --
> Regards,
> Bruce Kennewell,
> Canberra, Australia.
> ---------------------------



> > I try to as much as possible (whats the point otherwise, you may as well
> > play GP2 if you want no suspension travel and rock hard springs), but
> > information is so scarce that apart from springs and ground clearance
some
> > of the other settings are a bit of an educated guess. I felt that an
> > 'authentic' movement was building in r.a.s. last year, but it has
fizzled
> > out a bit.
> > Steve


> > >I'm curious.
> > >How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the
sim
> > >will allow) suspension and diff settings?

> > >(I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials at
> > >either 45/85 or 30/85.  The diff settings really make for a hell of a
> > >driving experience!!).

> > >--
> > >Regards,
> > >Bruce Kennewell,
> > >Canberra, Australia.
> > >---------------------------

> > >  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
> > ==----------
> > >   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the
> World!
> > >------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries
Servers
> > ==-----

>   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
==----------
>    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
> ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers

==-----
Mark Seer

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Mark Seer » Wed, 23 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Had they done just that, you would not have seen many of them alive now my
friend!

MS

: I historical correctness means setups that is slower, and GPL

> models handling accurately, then history was wrong; the drivers of '67
> should have been using different setups.....

> Jon





> > > (I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials at
> > > either 45/85 or 30/85.

> > Bruce, I sympathize with your attitude. But (you guessed this was
> > coming) when racing online my competitive instincts take over, and I go
> > for the quickest setup - realistic or not. Maybe it's time for a GPL
> > Classic league...

> > Problem is, what settings are historically accurate? How do you know
> > what they were using in those days?

> > --
> > Bye,
> > Leo

Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00

If, by "safe", you mean the least life-threatening, you're very wrong, Leo.

They "went for a setup" (which may have been nothing more than adjusting the
toe-in by a poof***th) that the technology and design of the day allowed.

Then they got in and drove the fastest laps that they could and still stay
on the black stuff.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------




> > the drivers of '67
> > should have been using different setups.....

> Hehe... only IF those drivers were immortal, had unlimited funds to
> replace cars, unlimited time to practice (or a Shift+R option :-).

> In real life they had only a few hours of practice, one car, one life.
> So they went for a setup that was safe for a 2 hour or 300 km race. It's
> a ***y miracle they were as fast as they were!

> --
> Bye,
> Leo

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.racesimcentral.net/       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Leo Landma

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Leo Landma » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00


That would be Allan McCall. Or Leo Wybrott for the Tasman series. Both are
still alive. Anyone know their e-mail address?

Bye,
Leo

Rafe McAulif

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Rafe McAulif » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00

On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:33:59 +1100, "Bruce Kennewell"


>I'm curious.
>How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the sim
>will allow) suspension and diff settings?

>(I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials at
>either 45/85 or 30/85.  The diff settings really make for a hell of a
>driving experience!!).

Bruce, what kind of bump stop settings do you use with your high
riding setups? How does it effect control over bumps, etc.? What
spring rates do you use in conjuction with this? Most people just set
the bump stops at minimum, but they were obviously well used in real
life. Any idea of the settings used at the time?

Rafe Mc

Steve Ferguso

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Steve Ferguso » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00

: I'm curious.
: How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the sim
: will allow) ... settings?

Well, I have been known to put on a set of pristine white coveralls and
style my hair with Brylcreem before stepping up to the computer... :-)

Stephen

p.s. yes, I shamelessly edited out part of your question.

Rafe McAulif

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Rafe McAulif » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00




>: I'm curious.
>: How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the sim
>: will allow) ... settings?

>Well, I have been known to put on a set of pristine white coveralls and
>style my hair with Brylcreem before stepping up to the computer... :-)

>Stephen

>p.s. yes, I shamelessly edited out part of your question.

When I got for that look, I usually put on an Englishman's handlebar
moustache before getting into my Lotus:)

Rafe Mc

Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I'd prefer their postal address, if you can dig it up, Leo.  Are they in
Britain or did Alan come back down under?

--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------



> > I'd rather talk to Jim's mechanic.

> That would be Allan McCall. Or Leo Wybrott for the Tasman series. Both are
> still alive. Anyone know their e-mail address?

> Bye,
> Leo

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00

:-)
I don't consider changing a set of pads as "tweaking", Ron!!

It was said, when he (Clark) raced here in his last Tasman series, that his
car was not "tweaked" from the time it arrived to the time it left.  (I
think they mean that it carried the same basic settings throughout the
series).
If true then that is certainly an indication of the brilliance of the bloke.

--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------


> Wrong Bruce.
> There was another change to his car. Jim was very light on his brakes
whilst
> Hill was something of an animal. They had to put a new set of pads on
Hill's
> car after every race. It was reported that they changed Clark's pads half
> way through the season because the mechanics were getting embarrased about
> not having to do so. By all accounts, those removed, would have done for
the
> rest of the year.

> MS


> > An interesting fact regarding Jim Clark and the Lotus he used in 1967.
It
> > was only ever "tweaked" twice during the season and one of those tweaks
> was
> > reversed (the toe-in was changed by a third of a degree or something
like
> > that.  He didn't like the handling change so it was changed back for the
> > next race!)

> > Pity that the "authentic movement" has faded out.

> > --
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Kennewell,
> > Canberra, Australia.
> > ---------------------------



> > > I try to as much as possible (whats the point otherwise, you may as
well
> > > play GP2 if you want no suspension travel and rock hard springs), but
> > > information is so scarce that apart from springs and ground clearance
> some
> > > of the other settings are a bit of an educated guess. I felt that an
> > > 'authentic' movement was building in r.a.s. last year, but it has
> fizzled
> > > out a bit.
> > > Steve


> > > >I'm curious.
> > > >How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the
> sim
> > > >will allow) suspension and diff settings?

> > > >(I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials
at
> > > >either 45/85 or 30/85.  The diff settings really make for a hell of a
> > > >driving experience!!).

> > > >--
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Bruce Kennewell,
> > > >Canberra, Australia.
> > > >---------------------------

> > > >  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
> > > ==----------
> > > >   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the
> > World!
> > > >------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries
> Servers
> > > ==-----

> >   -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
> ==----------
> >    http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the
World!
> > ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers
> ==-----

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----
??artij

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by ??artij » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00



bloke.

You think so? I dunno, perhaps it also indicates his total lack of
understanding of what a setup can do for the car?

Bruce Kennewel

GPL: Who uses "historic" settings?

by Bruce Kennewel » Thu, 24 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I use nothing less than 1.5 inches....usually 1.75, Rafe.
I believe, but cannot guarantee, that settings of this order were common.
Spring rates are never higher than 3.

What effect does it have over bumps?  Well.......it gives a softer "feel"
but I really haven't compared with harder settings because right from the
outset I only used "realistic" settings.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------


> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:33:59 +1100, "Bruce Kennewell"

> >I'm curious.
> >How many of you are using historically realistic (or as close as the sim
> >will allow) suspension and diff settings?

> >(I run all my cars at a minimum of 4.25 inches GC and differentials at
> >either 45/85 or 30/85.  The diff settings really make for a hell of a
> >driving experience!!).

> Bruce, what kind of bump stop settings do you use with your high
> riding setups? How does it effect control over bumps, etc.? What
> spring rates do you use in conjuction with this? Most people just set
> the bump stops at minimum, but they were obviously well used in real
> life. Any idea of the settings used at the time?

> Rafe Mc

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.