And fractal generators:
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
--
Don Scurlock
Vancouver,B.C.
GPLRank -15.39
MonsterRank 90.86
Come see how you rank, at the GPLRank site
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
And fractal generators:
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
--
Don Scurlock
Vancouver,B.C.
GPLRank -15.39
MonsterRank 90.86
Come see how you rank, at the GPLRank site
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> Okay I admit it has been a long time since I took control theory, and I
> believe I slept through most of it anyway, but I still have to question
> this. How can you define something that is oscillatory as stable?
> Doesn't the fact that it is oscillating mean that it can't reach or
> maintain an equilibrium point?
A damped sine wave is oscillatory and stable, at least until
it damps so low that you can ignore the oscillations.
Rafe Mc
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 01:28:55 +0100, "Jens H. Kruuse"
>> Didn't really understand that but it sounds fascinating stuff.
>> Is there anywhere on the web that I can find out a bit more
>> about this ?
>Introduction to complex numbers would be a good start:
>http://www.ping.be/math/complget.htm
>Haven't read it, so I can't vouch for the quality of the writing. But it
>seems fairly comprehensive - if not comprehendable. ;-)
>Complex numbers are commonly used in calculations dealing with various
>wave-forms, eg. water or electronics.
>/Jens
Eldred, having read all the other posts they all made good sense. What
worked for me though was to get the spring rates matched with the
weight balance of the car, as discussed by Ricardo Nunnini on his
website. The Lotus has 38% of the weight on the front wheels, 62% on
the rear. You set the car up with 38% total spring rate on the front,
62% on the rear. for example, 55 on the front, 90 on the rear gives
pretty much the right ratio.
If I ever drive GPL without the right spring rates for the car, I find
it oscillates all over the place. When they are set as above, it sits
into the corner nicely and feels nice and fast.
That said, it will still oscillate slightly, just it's much easier to
balance and more manageable. Having read Maxx's post (eventually!),
I'll try that to see how I go. Good luck!
Rafe Mc
>Many thanks!
It's not so much an overall margin for error it's more leaving quite
a bit of margin for error in one place (i.e. corner entry) which in
turn leads you to actually TAKE the corner in a different (not so
efective manner.
In fact, you are probably driving through the corner with little
margin for error, so you are not averse to driving close to
the limit, It's simply WHERE you do it.
Maxx
>>HHmmmm how much accellerator do you use when braking? The attitude of the
>>car as it enters the corner is usually controlled between both the accel and
>>brake.
>I'm usually OFF the gas when I brake. It seems counter-intuitive to be
>applying the gas when you're trying like hell to slow down. I'm working on
>that, though...
You CAN still go very quickly without this and there are many -ve rank
right-foot brakers, although I'm nots ure there are any/many hotlap
replays from them.
Maxx
Perfect sense and is exactly the point I was making. You ARE braking
just as well as them, just that you enter the corner slower, hence
need to brake earlier.
It means you don't have to worry about improving your braking
technique, JUST get used to entering corners quicker :-)
Maxx
It's actually VERY, VERY difficult to force yourself to stay on the
brakes right up to the initial point of turn-in.
If, as an instructor, I told a student to DO this, he probably
wouldn't be able to, certainly it would take lots of time and it
would probably be very "false".
As you mention elsewhere, we would use cones to denote where the
drivers should brake/tuen-in/clip and exit.
What we'd do is to sneakilly MOVE the braking cone further and further
up the track so, the driver is braking later and later (also we'd ask
some drivers, who we thought were ready, to brake a couple of
cars length later).
They knew they had to turn in at the turn-in cone, they also, by
now (usually the 5th day) had a feel for speed and grip so in a
desperate attempt to slow down enough to make the turn they
would hold onto the brake for longer and longer until they
would actually be easing off at the point of turn-in.
Thats the way I'd suggest you try and do it, you need to use
a corner were there is a very good indictaion of your normal
braking point.
It is tough though, you also NEED some amount of gas on
as you turn in (assuming >70mph corner) [generalisation].
TURN-IN is in-fact perhaps the most important aspect of
the whole cornering process. It dictates your line through the
whole corner AND the amount of speed you carry through
and out of it.
Maxx
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
I noticed the same thing with mine. And I really do think it's a matter of
"trusting" the car, it just doesn't seem like you're going to make the
corner at speed X so you continue to slow to X-10 or something to be sure
you're going to get through okay. One thing that's really helped me with
this is the video someone posted a link to here a while back of the guy's
feet while he was driving Kyalami or Zandy or somewhere. I don't think he
was ever 100% brake - 0% gas, and I believe in most of the turns he was
somewhere between 70-30 and 30-70 in different parts of the turn, definitely
steering the car with his feet. I found the easiest place to work on this
was Silverstone, and it increased my comfort level in the turns a great
deal. Nothing magic, but a very helpful starting point for me.
http://www.sim-replays.de/
Follow the link to the "video" section. I, too, found it very helpful.
I tend to like Wilke's setups as well.
Michael Lowery
> "EldredP" wrote ...
> > When I look at the speed graph in
> > RA, I see my braking start sooner than the fast guys. The relative speeds
> > follow parallel lines down to the slowest part of the corner, with mine
> ending
> > later and lower. Because the braking lines stay parallel, that should
> mean
> > that we're slowing at the same RATE, I just do it earlier and for longer.
> > Well, I might release the brakes earlier, but my slowest speed is slower
> than
> > theirs. Does that make sense?
> I noticed the same thing with mine. And I really do think it's a matter of
> "trusting" the car, it just doesn't seem like you're going to make the
> corner at speed X so you continue to slow to X-10 or something to be sure
> you're going to get through okay. One thing that's really helped me with
> this is the video someone posted a link to here a while back of the guy's
> feet while he was driving Kyalami or Zandy or somewhere. I don't think he
> was ever 100% brake - 0% gas, and I believe in most of the turns he was
> somewhere between 70-30 and 30-70 in different parts of the turn, definitely
> steering the car with his feet. I found the easiest place to work on this
> was Silverstone, and it increased my comfort level in the turns a great
> deal. Nothing magic, but a very helpful starting point for me.
Aren't you effectively "adjusting" the rear brake bias by using the
throttle? You set a rear bias in the chassis setup, then reduce the
amount of rear braking effort in a race by progressively applying
throttle under braking, in effect moving the brake bias forward. Quite a
balancing act, but it makes sense to me (I couldn't do it myself though!)
cheers
John
>>So you *shouldn't* have a margin for error? You really have to trust that
>car,
>>huh?<g>
>It's not so much an overall margin for error it's more leaving quite
>a bit of margin for error in one place (i.e. corner entry) which in
>turn leads you to actually TAKE the corner in a different (not so
>efective manner.
>In fact, you are probably driving through the corner with little
>margin for error, so you are not averse to driving close to
>the limit, It's simply WHERE you do it.
>Maxx
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
>Well, we've had the discussions about this and whether it's valid/used
>in real-life but I agree, it doesn't feel natural BUT if you are
>trying to emulate the braking/turn-in of (most) hot-lappers, you will
>need to do it.
>You CAN still go very quickly without this and there are many -ve rank
>right-foot brakers, although I'm nots ure there are any/many hotlap
>replays from them.
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.