rec.autos.simulators

F1 2002 vs GP4 - The Final Say ;-)

Nick

F1 2002 vs GP4 - The Final Say ;-)

by Nick » Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:28:26

Are you confused by the arguments about GP4 and F1 2002? Which is better? So
am I. I went on an excursion to the deepest parts of the internet, where I
found this comparison (http://maxrevs.gamigo.de/artikel.php?ID=114), but it
was in German, which I don't speak (I can ask the best route to the station,
but that's it). So, with a little help from Babelfish, here is what it
means:

----------

GP4 vs. F12002 - result (page 1 of 1)

For quite some time there is "controversy" again and again in the on-line
Communities, which F1 play is the better at present. Was it at that time
Grand Prix 2 or Racing simulation 2? Was it F1 2000? Grand Prix 3 or F1
Racing Championship? Grand Prix 3 or F1 2001? F1 Racing Championship or F1
2001? One sees, the combinations is various, and surely one knows the
combinations of far wildly in disorder cubes. Why it should today different
is. Thus is the question of all questions Grand Prix 4 or F1 called 2002?

Dennis means:

GP4 with 2001er license against F1 2002 with 200r license? Actually one
cannot at all compare these two plays, but we do it nevertheless! ... and
always with both eyes on the updates and AddOns, which give and/or will
probably still give it for both plays. Which does not get to thus read it
here is by any means an objective comparison, which play out OF the box (is
to be called: without updates of the Community) the better of both is.

F1 2002 does not have by the way an advantage which can be underestimated
opposite GP4, it came well two weeks in former times into the trade as the
representatives from the house Infogrames. Two weeks experience with F1
2002, which spent these two weeks without competition on the PCS of the
players. Times completely honestly, GP3 and F1RC could hand F1 2001 and
already not at all to F1 2002 the water, simply and simply due to, in
relation to the I/O plays, high age. In the policy one calls such a
situation every four years again the "chancellor bonuses", psychologically
seen is it rather the phenomenon that humans hold rather to proven as a
"risk" with something new to die.

GP4 comes along finally with team-specific Carshapes, which one could
already have implemented in GP3 and be supposed. Besides there are now
finally also clever distances (government inspection department measure
according to PR). Which seems already nearly ridiculously is the missing
stop and Go punishments to be silent from drive Through punishments
completely but those became eh only in the 200r season imported. And the GP
series hangs as well known until several years afterwards (to the license
referred).

My first play of the GP series was GP2, GP1 I later only briefly alluded.
And to be over honest GP4 drives itself still like GP2. In the dry one
anyhow. The rain mode is and remains since GP3 unquestioned the best which
in a F1 play so far seeing and be experienced was.

The AI (artificial intelligence) of both plays can be discussed. The
computer drivers in both plays do not earn the term Kuenstliche intelligence
actually, even if the F1 is somewhat friendlier been correct 2002 AI than of
GP4.

As much to GP4.

And which makes F1 2002 now so expressed well? Who got accustomed once to
the driving feeling of F1 2001 and/or F1 2002, to which from GP4 the
altbacken. and will simply seem. The Force feedback of F1 2002 strikes the
quiet contradictions the GP4 to the input device sends around lengths. But
which F1 is really unbeatable 2002 for the moment for me not to do has with
the actual play much:

The number of the updates and AddOns as well as the possibilities of
developing such.

It is quite possible to deny a running of 1000 rounds on for 10 miles an
oval with a starter field from 50 cars to. If someone is, which converts the
cars and the distance. Together with the very good basis for me the
principal reason is, why I am bent to call F1 2002 superior opposite GP4. As
you see has that with the plays to actually do not too much. _ the
conclusion the it however from pull can be following:

Both plays make for so much fun that such Nebensaechlichkeit. can decide on
it, which play one preferential; -)

Benny means:

The two plays to compare falls heavily, because both have their own style,
which could more differently not be. While F1 attaches 2002 much importance
to driving physics, lives Grand Prix 4 of the developed Spielathmosphaere,
and the small details, which make the play so worth seeing. Who loves it its
cars by the curves to flog and it in the letzen moment to still intercept,
should seize to F1 2002. With Grand Prix 4 with driving physics more value
on durable play passport one put, because if one does not drive in the rain
(the rain mode is also further unsurpassed good!), one will have
difficulties its cars to breaking out to induce. Nevertheless has my opinion
after Grand Prix 4 the nose in front, even if only scarcely, because it
works by far not as "sterile" as F1 2002, and the long-term play passport is
by far higher than with F1 2002...

----------

Hmmm, it's still a little opaque to my eyes, but fortunately I found another
translator, this time converting the Queen's English (which I am sure you
will all admit the above text is a perfect example), into a much more
understandable language. This translator has been mentioned before in this
newsgroup, and is at (http://www.joel.net/EBONICS/translator.asp).

----------

GP4 vs. F12002 - result (page 1 o' 1)

For quite some tyme dere iz "controversy" ag'in an' ag'in in da on-line
Communities, which F1 play iz da bettah at present. Was it at dat tyme Grand
Prix 2 or Racing simulation 2? Was it F1 2000? Grand Prix 3 or F1 Racing
Championship? Grand Prix 3 or F1 2001? F1 Racing Championship or F1 2001?
One sees, da combinations iz various, an' surely one knows da combinations
o' far wildly in disorder cubes. Why it should taday different iz. Thus iz
da queshun o' all questions Grand Prix 4 or F1 called 2002?

Dennis means:

GP4 wiff 2001er license against F1 2002 wiff 200r license? Actually one
cannot at all compare deez two plays, but we's do it nevertheless! ... an'
always wiff both peeps on da updates an' AddOns, which give and/or will
prob'ly still give it fo' both plays. Which do not git ta thus read it here
iz by any means an objective comparison, which play out OF da bawx (is ta be
called: without updates o' da Community) da bettah o' both iz.

F1 2002 do not gots by da way an advantage which can be underestimated
opposite GP4, it came well two weeks in former times into da trade as da
representatives from da crib Infogrames. Two weeks experience wiff F1 2002,
which spent deez two weeks without competition on da PCS o' da players.
Times completely honestly, GP3 an' F1RC could hand F1 2001 an' already not
at all ta F1 2002 da water, simply an' simply due ta, in relation ta da I/O
plays, high age. In da policy one calls such uh shit every four years ag'in
da "chancellor bonuses", psychologically seen iz it rather da phenomenon dat
humans hold rather ta proven as uh "risk" wiff somethin' new ta die.

GP4 comes along finally wiff team-specific Carshapes, which one could
already gots implemented in GP3 an' be supposed. Besides dere iz now finally
also clever distances (government inspection department measure according ta
PR). Which seems already nearly ridiculously iz da missing stop an' Go
punishments ta be silent from cruize Through punishments completely but
those became eh only in da 200r season imported. And da GP series hangs as
well known until several years afterwards (to da license referred).

My first play o' da GP series wuz GP2, GP1 I later only briefly alluded. And
ta be over honest GP4 drives itself still like GP2. In da dry one anyhow.
The rain mode iz an' remains since GP3 unquestioned da bomb which in uh F1
play so far seeing an' be experienced wuz.

The AI (artificial intelligence) o' both plays can be discussed. The geekbox
drivers in both plays do not earn da term Kuenstliche intelligence actually,
even if da F1 iz somewhat friendlier been correct 2002 AI than o' GP4.

As much ta GP4.

And which makes F1 2002 now so expressed well? Who got accustomed once ta da
rollin' feeling o' F1 2001 and/or F1 2002, ta which from GP4 da altbacken.
an' will simply seem. The Force feedback o' F1 2002 strikes da quiet
contradictions da GP4 ta da input device sends around lengths. But which F1
iz really unbeatable 2002 fo' da moment fo' me not ta do has wiff da actual
play much:

The number o' da updates an' AddOns as well as da possibilities o'
developing such.

It iz quite possible ta deny uh running o' 1000 rounds on fo' 10 miles an
oval wiff uh starter field from 50 cars ta. If someone iz, which converts da
cars an' da distance. Together wiff da very pimp-tight basis fo' me da
principal reason iz, why I be bent ta page F1 2002 superior opposite GP4. As
ya see has dat wiff da plays ta actually do not too much. _ da conclusion da
it however from pull can be following:

Both plays make fo' so much fun dat such Nebensaechlichkeit. can decide on
it, which play one preferential; -)

Benny means:

The two plays ta compare falls heavily, cuz both gots they own style, which
could mo' differently not be. While F1 attaches 2002 much importance ta
rollin' physics, lives Grand Prix 4 o' da developed Spielathmosphaere, an'
da small details, which make da play so worth seeing. Who loves it its cars
by da curves ta flog an' it in da letzen moment ta still intercept, should
seize ta F1 2002. With Grand Prix 4 wiff rollin' physics mo' value on
durable play passport one put, cuz if one do not cruize in da rain (the rain
mode iz also further unsurpassed pimp-tight!), one will gots difficulties
its cars ta breaking out ta induce. Nevertheless has muh ma fuckin opinion
afta Grand Prix 4 da nose in front, even if only scarcely, cuz it werkz by
far not as "sterile" as F1 2002, an' da long-term play passport iz by far
higher than wiff F1 2002... you know das right!

----------

Wow, it's like the clouds have parted! GP4 - "In da policy one calls such uh
shit every four years ag'in da 'chancellor bonuses'". Jeez, this guy knows
what he's talking about...

Nick.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.