rec.autos.simulators

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

Michael Youn

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Michael Youn » Mon, 28 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I was playing around with the FF settings in GPL last night, and found they
have a strong influence on my lap times, as much as 3 seconds at Rouen. For
the past month or so, I've been running what felt like pretty realistic
settings, but that really kills my hands and wrist in long sessions. Lighter
settings were OK for a short while. I no longer needed a death grip on the
wheel to fight the strong kicks, and felt I had better control for fine
corrections. The road forces, though, seemed to be strongly muted, and I
could no longer feel what the front was doing.

What started as a short experiment finally ended in frustration many hours
later in the wee hours this morning. I'm no closer to understanding the
settings in core.ini, and now don't recall what I had them set to. What do
you use for your MSFF?

Michael.

GTX_SlotCa

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by GTX_SlotCa » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00

What settings are you using now and what did you use before?

Slot


Scott Boha

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Scott Boha » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00


Lighter

This is normal.  When I first started racing karts, my lower arms would
absolutely kill after just 15 mins of racing.  Just imagine hauling around
an F1 car with 1 turn lock to lock and no power steering.

I still use the original ff settings because I don't really understand what
affects changing those numbers will have, and I don't have the time to try
all the different combos.  If anyone could suggest a 'realistic' set of
numbers to use, that would be great.

Michael Youn

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Michael Youn » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00


I'm using a latency of 0.010, and a damping force of 35.0. Max torque is
commented out. I'm looking for best feel for road conditions, without
inviting repetitive stress injury.

Before, the forces were high enough that my hands and wrist were still sore
the next morning. Two weekends ago, I ran a full GP at Spa plus the second 2
hr practice before that, about 3 hours of actual track time in one sitting.
(I finished 5th, and was pleasantly pleased, if tired and drained. I had
only recently made some strong breakthroughs in lap times.) I think damping
force was 85, and possibly the initial default 0.035 latency; max torque was
still commented out at the time, I believe. Part of the problem is I didn't
make note of how it was set before I started making changes (who would think
you would so easily forget 3 little numbers?). The wheel was heavy, and
kicked strongly from time to time; road feel was very good, and the shaker
let me know when I was running right out to the pavement edge.

Anyway, I've since tried changing the FF numbers to see if I could get a
lighter feel without losing too much feedback. I never did find a good value
to use for max torque. It would either shimmy strongly, or was too light to
be of much use. By shimmy, I mean the wheel would slap back and forth if I
let go, even at slow speed. At one point, I could distinctly smell the ozone
of an overstressed electric motor. I realize that the shimmy is an artifact;
not finding resistance, the aligning forces would quickly turn the wheel
until it reversed, and then it would feedback the other way. However, I
never did find a balance that I liked.

So, that's why I'm asking. Last weekend, I thought I would amuse myself by
taking a break from struggling around Rouen, and take a few turns around Spa
while loaded up on a half bottle of Merlot (Lynfred Winery 1999 Private
Reserve; absolute nectar if you like this kind of thing!). My second lap
out, I turned a PB of 3:21, 0.8 seconds faster than ever before. It was at
this point that I started to monkey with the FF numbers, and things haven't
been right since. Even if I can't improve on it, I'd like to at least get
things back to where they were. Hence my appeal for your help. My lap times,
at both Rouen and Spa, are now almost 2 full seconds slower than at that
peak of ***ic bliss. The only changes were to the FF settings.

Michael.

Richard G Cleg

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Richard G Cleg » Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:00:00

: Anyway, I've since tried changing the FF numbers to see if I could get a
: lighter feel without losing too much feedback. I never did find a good value
: to use for max torque. It would either shimmy strongly, or was too light to
: be of much use. By shimmy, I mean the wheel would slap back and forth if I
: let go, even at slow speed. At one point, I could distinctly smell the ozone
: of an overstressed electric motor. I realize that the shimmy is an artifact;
: not finding resistance, the aligning forces would quickly turn the wheel
: until it reversed, and then it would feedback the other way. However, I
: never did find a balance that I liked.

  As I understand it, the "shimmy" you describe is a result of having
the latency set too low.  As I understand latency it is a measure
of "how far ahead you want to predict the wheel setting" - you can't
get the "force" to the wheel instantly, there is a certain delay.
Therefore, GPL predicts what the force WILL be in a certain amount of
time and sends that to the wheel in the hope it will get there.

  A lot of GPLers simply assume "low latency is good" (right) and
therefore set the latency as low as possible (wrong).  

  As I understand it, if you set the latency too low, once the force
gets to the wheels, it "lags" what the wheels are actually doing.
Imagine you are travelling down the straight, your wheel is slightly to
the right - there should be a restoring force to move your wheel to the
centre.  Therefore, GPL sends a "move wheel left a bit" message to your
wheel.  However, if the latency is set too low in GPL then by the time
the message gets to your wheel and moves it left your on-screen wheel is
straight.... as I understand it, this rocking from side to side is a
problem of low latency setting up a non-linear dynamic system (to borrow
a phrase from my work).  Try popping the latency up a bit higher and see
if it helps.

  Richard.

  Disclaimer: other people on this group probably understand the FF
settings much better than me and might find flaws in my reasoning.

--
Richard G. Clegg       Only the mind is waving
    Networks and Non-Linear Dynamics Group
      Dept. of Mathematics, Uni. of York
    www:  http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html

Olav K. Malm

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Olav K. Malm » Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:00:00



> : Anyway, I've since tried changing the FF numbers to see if I could get a
> : lighter feel without losing too much feedback. I never did find a good value
> : to use for max torque. It would either shimmy strongly, or was too light to
> : be of much use. By shimmy, I mean the wheel would slap back and forth if I
> : let go, even at slow speed. At one point, I could distinctly smell the ozone
> : of an overstressed electric motor. I realize that the shimmy is an artifact;
> : not finding resistance, the aligning forces would quickly turn the wheel
> : until it reversed, and then it would feedback the other way. However, I
> : never did find a balance that I liked.

>   As I understand it, the "shimmy" you describe is a result of having
> the latency set too low.  As I understand latency it is a measure
> of "how far ahead you want to predict the wheel setting" - you can't
> get the "force" to the wheel instantly, there is a certain delay.
> Therefore, GPL predicts what the force WILL be in a certain amount of
> time and sends that to the wheel in the hope it will get there.

>   A lot of GPLers simply assume "low latency is good" (right) and
> therefore set the latency as low as possible (wrong).  

>   As I understand it, if you set the latency too low, once the force
> gets to the wheels, it "lags" what the wheels are actually doing.
> Imagine you are travelling down the straight, your wheel is slightly to
> the right - there should be a restoring force to move your wheel to the
> centre.  Therefore, GPL sends a "move wheel left a bit" message to your
> wheel.  However, if the latency is set too low in GPL then by the time
> the message gets to your wheel and moves it left your on-screen wheel is
> straight.... as I understand it, this rocking from side to side is a
> problem of low latency setting up a non-linear dynamic system (to borrow
> a phrase from my work).  Try popping the latency up a bit higher and see
> if it helps.

Thanks for the tip. I've always known why the wheel go wild, but never how
to fix it. I'll try it when I get home from work.

--
Olav K. Malmin
remove spam when replying

GTX_SlotCa

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by GTX_SlotCa » Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Oddly enough, my best F1 time at Monza was while I was feeling quite relaxed
(and a bit dizzy)  ;)

Try these settings, what have you got to lose?
Damping=4000
Steering_torque=1800
Change the torque to 2000 and then 1500 and try those as well. Let me know
how it works on your wheel.

Slot




> > What settings are you using now and what did you use before?

> I'm using a latency of 0.010, and a damping force of 35.0. Max torque is
> commented out. I'm looking for best feel for road conditions, without
> inviting repetitive stress injury.

> Before, the forces were high enough that my hands and wrist were still
sore
> the next morning. Two weekends ago, I ran a full GP at Spa plus the second
2
> hr practice before that, about 3 hours of actual track time in one
sitting.
> (I finished 5th, and was pleasantly pleased, if tired and drained. I had
> only recently made some strong breakthroughs in lap times.) I think
damping
> force was 85, and possibly the initial default 0.035 latency; max torque
was
> still commented out at the time, I believe. Part of the problem is I
didn't
> make note of how it was set before I started making changes (who would
think
> you would so easily forget 3 little numbers?). The wheel was heavy, and
> kicked strongly from time to time; road feel was very good, and the shaker
> let me know when I was running right out to the pavement edge.

> Anyway, I've since tried changing the FF numbers to see if I could get a
> lighter feel without losing too much feedback. I never did find a good
value
> to use for max torque. It would either shimmy strongly, or was too light
to
> be of much use. By shimmy, I mean the wheel would slap back and forth if I
> let go, even at slow speed. At one point, I could distinctly smell the
ozone
> of an overstressed electric motor. I realize that the shimmy is an
artifact;
> not finding resistance, the aligning forces would quickly turn the wheel
> until it reversed, and then it would feedback the other way. However, I
> never did find a balance that I liked.

> So, that's why I'm asking. Last weekend, I thought I would amuse myself by
> taking a break from struggling around Rouen, and take a few turns around
Spa
> while loaded up on a half bottle of Merlot (Lynfred Winery 1999 Private
> Reserve; absolute nectar if you like this kind of thing!). My second lap
> out, I turned a PB of 3:21, 0.8 seconds faster than ever before. It was at
> this point that I started to monkey with the FF numbers, and things
haven't
> been right since. Even if I can't improve on it, I'd like to at least get
> things back to where they were. Hence my appeal for your help. My lap
times,
> at both Rouen and Spa, are now almost 2 full seconds slower than at that
> peak of ***ic bliss. The only changes were to the FF settings.

> Michael.

Michael Youn

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Michael Youn » Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:00:00

By golly and gosh! these seem to have done it. Thanks for your help. It's
very light, but tremendously driveable. Great feedback without undue strain,
and it just takes two fingers to guide it down the long straights. Oh, and
the sharp difference between entrance at Masta and mid-point is frightening!
I don't know how I managed at all before this.

Michael.


Michael Youn

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Michael Youn » Wed, 01 Mar 2000 04:00:00



I'm not sure that I agree. While I still don't understand how the numbers
change what, setting a much higher damping value cured this. Looking at the
effect, I would guess that this value is properly named: under-damped
systems oscillate; higher damping fixed the problem. I agree with you about
latency, though, since my reaction to any delay is probably typical of
everyone else. :-) It seems just as driveable at 0.01 as 0.05. I haven't
tried values outside that range.

Michael.

Bart Westr

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Bart Westr » Thu, 02 Mar 2000 04:00:00


What settings for MSFF do you use in control panel?

Ruud van Ga

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by Ruud van Ga » Thu, 02 Mar 2000 04:00:00





>> What settings are you using now and what did you use before?

>I'm using a latency of 0.010, and a damping force of 35.0. Max torque is
>commented out. I'm looking for best feel for road conditions, without
>inviting repetitive stress injury.

My original Papyrus settings were:

[ Joy ]
allow_force_feedback = 1                        ; Use FF if device has
it
force_feedback_damping = 25.000000              ; force feedback
damping coefficient (org)
force_feedback_latency = 0.085000               ; force feedback
latency (secs) org Sierra
max_steering_torque = 225.000000                ; steering torque in
N*in giving max device force

Never played around much with them though. A bit more damping, a bit
more torque, but didn't really test much.

Ruud van Gaal
MarketGraph / MachTech: http://www.marketgraph.nl
Art: http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery

GTX_SlotCa

GPL FF settings for MSFF?

by GTX_SlotCa » Thu, 02 Mar 2000 04:00:00

I  would set the overall device gain to max, and all others to 0.

Slot



rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.