rec.autos.simulators

RASCAR race schedule

John Simmon

RASCAR race schedule

by John Simmon » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 07:31:47




> >> Nobody wants to be the cop, 'cept maybe JS, & I wouldn't want to give him the
> >> satisfaction, even tho he is probably the best candidate for the job...  j/k
> >> John    ;o)

> >I don't WANT to do it, but since I've had experience doing it in three
> >other leagues, and since nobody else wanted to step up (I figure waiting
> >four months is more than long enough), I took on the job.

> Actually, I was kinda hoping you were going to do a review for Coke
> like you did a few weeks ago, I was kinda interested to hear what your
> take would be on my two incidents.

If I do your's, I'll do everybody else's. You know how *that* would pan
out.

That's what I thought too, but nobody else seems to agree with me
(except you).

I've begun to think that maybe I'm just expecting too much.

--
=========================================================
Redneck Techno-Biker & "programming deity"
  http://www.racesimcentral.net/
DeMONS/1 for Nascar Racing 3 & Nascar Legends
  http://www.racesimcentral.net/
DeMONS/2 for Nascar Racing 4 and 2002 Season (in development)
  http://www.racesimcentral.net/
RASCAR Roster
  http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Barbarian Diecast Collector (490+ cars and counting)
  http://www.racesimcentral.net/

If you want to send me email, go to the first URL shown
above & click "Send Me Mail" in the contents frame.
=========================================================

grubba

RASCAR race schedule

by grubba » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:43:11

Your wish has come true. I finally got this ISDN beast up and running.
Instead of getting pings in the 500-850 range, I've been getting around 110
on average tonight with a standard deviation of about 30. If it keeps
working half this good, I will be on cloud nine. The only problem is that I
can't blame my mistakes on my connection anymore....:(
B.Farme

RASCAR race schedule

by B.Farme » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:13:23


Cool, glad to hear you got a better conn...   Only problem is that now *I* will
have one of the higher lat #s, tho my Quality has always been 99-100.  Since
moving about 2 mos ago I haven't been able to get *any* kind of broadband, tho
I'm told it'll be "real soon, now" ... yeah right.  :o/

Brian

B.Farme

RASCAR race schedule

by B.Farme » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:05:21


<snip>

want to give him the

John, in re-reading what I posted, I realized that I didn't make
myself very clear.  The j/k & grin were meant to apply to the
"not give him the satisfaction" part.  I *meant* the part about
"best candidate for the job", & indeed support that idea (if you
really want to open that potential can o' worms).

Haven't given it a lot of thought, but it strikes me (going by
the last time you tried to critique the race) that you may
consider *not* critiquing yourself ('cept maybe an "I screwed up
on lap xx, waddaya think?" kinda thing), otherwise you leave
yourself open to criticisms (valid or not) that you are easier
on yourself than on others.  Just the possibility of a "conflict
of interest" is enough for some to assume that there is one (ask
some folks on Wall Street).  Setting it up so that it is
*understood* that you will avoid any criticisms of your own
driving, & leaving that up to others *may* be workable.  Anybody
else have input?

backgrounds, etc (which
differing reactions &

Gotta disagree w/ you on this one.  International differences
are an issue, 'cause some of our friends across the pond(s) are
relatively unaccustomed to Nascar's idiosyncricies(sp?), or
racing side by side for laps on end on a "boring" oval track, or
accepted pace etiquette, etc.  This *is* a learning experience
for some, & has improved a great deal over the course of a few
months.

somewhere in between.
wonders, as has been
rules.

I'm inclined to agree with the rest of your post.  Ya got my
vote.    ;o)

Brian

Eldre

RASCAR race schedule

by Eldre » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:49:29



>> I think that pointing out peoples mistakes here probably would be the
>> best deterrent to bone-headed driving.

>That's what I thought too, but nobody else seems to agree with me
>(except you).

I agree on that point, but I also know that there will be those who won't.  I'd
be curious about your take on *my* incident, though...<g>

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
My .sig file is in the shop for repairs...

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Larr

RASCAR race schedule

by Larr » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:09:13

ISDN is GREAT for online racing (at least as a client - you won't be hosting
much).

It's plenty fast at 128kb/sec, and more importantly, ISDN is extremely
stable and low-latency.

Of course, that assumes that your ISP is worth a damn.

-Larry


> Got me right between the eyes B.farmer!!!!! Your right. What am I doing
> about it? Well, ISDN has been on order since July 8th. They (the phone co)
> installed a midspan repeater? and it is still not right. But, they have
> there best guys on it!!! I hope to have ISDN by the next race.
> grub





> > > Thanks for the races on saturday Eldred. I appreciate you dedicating
> your
> > > time and equipment for this.

> > > As for the rest of you, here is what I think.

> > > Rules require enforcement.
> > > Enforcement requres time, money, and effort.
> > > No enforcement, rules are useless.
> > > Eldred is volunteer. Eldred has job too.
> > > Me not want Eldred to volunteer any more of his resources for this.
> > > Volunteering should be fun. Enforcement not fun. Enforcement sucks.
> > > Eldred not happy. If Edlred not happy, then me not happy.
> > > Therefore,***on additional rules. (except for maybe one.)

> > > How have the offenders been handled in the past? Flames?
> > > Lets be gentlemen. Haze the offenders. Flame the mess out of them.
> > > Lets continue this silly season with the KISS principle.
> > > KISS
> > > Keep It Simple Simracer (or Stupid)

> > > Once again, Eldred thank you for your time. If you do decide to bow
out,
> > > lets all start door knocking for someone with a T1 or DSL line that
> would be
> > > willing to host a  SIMPLE FREEKING FIXED SETUP RACE ON SATURDAY AT 4PM
> EST.
> > > POCONO WOULD BE NICE THIS SATURDAY.

> > > where is that nerve medicine......
> > > grub

> > Been reading the related posts here lately, & been wondering if I should
> commit
> > my 2 cents worth, when grub comes along & does it for me.

> > Nobody wants to be the cop, 'cept maybe JS, & I wouldn't want to give
him
> the
> > satisfaction, even tho he is probably the best candidate for the job...
> j/k
> > John    ;o)

> > In a group representing different countries, cultures, backgrounds, etc
> (which
> > is the *main* reason I like  RASCAR), you will always get differing
> reactions &
> > solutions to problems, even as to whether a problem really exists.

> > Some want a more controlled, more disciplined environment; others want a
> free
> > for all, "run what ya brung" experience.   Me?  I'm somewhere in
between.

> > Respect for each other, & a little give & take will do wonders, as has
> been
> > apparent over the last few races.  The Golden Rule seems to apply here
> rather
> > well.

> > Grub, your idea of "flaming the offenders" has merit, tho a few attempts
> have
> > created some bad feelings here b4.  Even with this warning, allow me to
be
> the
> > first to embrace this method:

> > GRUB, GET A NEW MODEM!!!!!!!!!!!

> > ;o)

> > Brian

Larr

RASCAR race schedule

by Larr » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:13:31

I've never disagreed with pointing out others mistakes, as long as it
doesn't turn into a 3-day flame-fest.  I get tired of reading that shit.

And I believe it requires a certain tactfullness.  Keeping it interesting
and I dare say fun will cut down on some of the problems we've seen in the
past.

-Larry





> > >> Nobody wants to be the cop, 'cept maybe JS, & I wouldn't want to give
him the
> > >> satisfaction, even tho he is probably the best candidate for the
job...  j/k
> > >> John    ;o)

> > >I don't WANT to do it, but since I've had experience doing it in three
> > >other leagues, and since nobody else wanted to step up (I figure
waiting
> > >four months is more than long enough), I took on the job.

> > Actually, I was kinda hoping you were going to do a review for Coke
> > like you did a few weeks ago, I was kinda interested to hear what your
> > take would be on my two incidents.

> If I do your's, I'll do everybody else's. You know how *that* would pan
> out.

> > I think that pointing out peoples mistakes here probably would be the
> > best deterrent to bone-headed driving.

> That's what I thought too, but nobody else seems to agree with me
> (except you).

> > If you do it, you are just gonna have to realize that, when called
> > out, people are gonna argue their case and you will probably get
> > flamed.  By next week though all *should* be forgotten.

> I've begun to think that maybe I'm just expecting too much.

> --
> =========================================================
> Redneck Techno-Biker & "programming deity"
>   http://www.paddedwall.org/john
> DeMONS/1 for Nascar Racing 3 & Nascar Legends
>   http://www.paddedwall.org/demons
> DeMONS/2 for Nascar Racing 4 and 2002 Season (in development)
>   http://www.paddedwall.org/demons2
> RASCAR Roster
>   http://www.paddedwall.org/rascar
> Barbarian Diecast Collector (490+ cars and counting)
>   http://www.paddedwall.org/diecast

> If you want to send me email, go to the first URL shown
> above & click "Send Me Mail" in the contents frame.
> =========================================================

Larr

RASCAR race schedule

by Larr » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:13:59

Other than the bill, you're going to love ISDN for online *** :)

-Larry


Larr

RASCAR race schedule

by Larr » Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:18:23

You know, there really are only two rules that are needed:

1.  The Rules as applied by the SIM.
2.  Respect for your fellow drivers.

The rest doesn't matter, because the above two, if followed, take care of
everything else except the true mistakes, which happen to EVERYONE.

The only flaw is the 100 page document needed to define the word "Respect"
:)

-Larry




> <snip>

> > > Nobody wants to be the cop, 'cept maybe JS, & I wouldn't
> want to give him the
> > > satisfaction, even tho he is probably the best candidate for
> the job...  j/k
> > > John    ;o)

> > I don't WANT to do it, but since I've had experience doing it
> in three
> > other leagues, and since nobody else wanted to step up (I
> figure waiting
> > four months is more than long enough), I took on the job.

> John, in re-reading what I posted, I realized that I didn't make
> myself very clear.  The j/k & grin were meant to apply to the
> "not give him the satisfaction" part.  I *meant* the part about
> "best candidate for the job", & indeed support that idea (if you
> really want to open that potential can o' worms).

> Haven't given it a lot of thought, but it strikes me (going by
> the last time you tried to critique the race) that you may
> consider *not* critiquing yourself ('cept maybe an "I screwed up
> on lap xx, waddaya think?" kinda thing), otherwise you leave
> yourself open to criticisms (valid or not) that you are easier
> on yourself than on others.  Just the possibility of a "conflict
> of interest" is enough for some to assume that there is one (ask
> some folks on Wall Street).  Setting it up so that it is
> *understood* that you will avoid any criticisms of your own
> driving, & leaving that up to others *may* be workable.  Anybody
> else have input?

> > > In a group representing different countries, cultures,
> backgrounds, etc (which
> > > is the *main* reason I like  RASCAR), you will always get
> differing reactions &
> > > solutions to problems, even as to whether a problem really
> exists.

> > This is a crock - international differences and varying
> cultures should
> > be left in the garage area (or paddock for you euro guys).  In
> IGPS, we
> > had guys from half a dozen countries, and the only real
> problem we had
> > was with an Italian guy who thought the rules applied to
> everyone but
> > him.  He was eventually ejected from the league.

> Gotta disagree w/ you on this one.  International differences
> are an issue, 'cause some of our friends across the pond(s) are
> relatively unaccustomed to Nascar's idiosyncricies(sp?), or
> racing side by side for laps on end on a "boring" oval track, or
> accepted pace etiquette, etc.  This *is* a learning experience
> for some, & has improved a great deal over the course of a few
> months.

> >The real problem is that anyone can join our races, and not
> everybody
> > has evidently read the current guidelines.

> > > Some want a more controlled, more disciplined environment;
> others want a free
> > > for all, "run what ya brung" experience.   Me?  I'm
> somewhere in between.

> > I would be happy if we didn't need additional "rules", but
> people seem
> > to forget the fact that they're racing online on a network
> that is
> > highly unreliable and varies in quality from one minute to the
> next, and
> > and they do really stupid shit on a seemingly never-ending
> basis.

> > > Respect for each other, & a little give & take will do
> wonders, as has been
> > > apparent over the last few races.  The Golden Rule seems to
> apply here rather
> > > well.

> > Respect for the racing environment is more important.  If we
> can't
> > create value in our races by having clean races, we can't
> convince
> > people to drive with their heads place somewhere other than
> their asses
> > in order to retain their priviledge of racing with us.

> > PRACTICE:
> > Since we're running with fixed setups, it shouldn't be tough
> at all to
> > show up with a fairly intimate knowledge of how the car works
> under
> > various conditions.  I race several races offline against the
> AI so that
> > I can see what I have to do to pass on the inside, pass on the
> outside,
> > as well as be passed on the inside or outside.  I know how the
> car acts
> > on new tires, and I know how the car acts on old tires.

> > It's not that freakin hard to spend time to learn the setup
> and find out
> > how to drive at a particular track, but I think that's one of
> our
> > biggest problems.

> > RESTARTS:
> >*** back, jump starting, chatting, picking your nose - it
> all
> > contributes to a BAD restart.  It seems there's a certain
> number of
> > people that simply cannot drive at the pace speed for any
> longer than
> > maybe a second.  The further back in the pack you get, the
> worse the yo-
> > yo effect is.  You speed up, and then brake suddenly and slow
> down -
> > because the guy in front of you did.

> > ---------------

> > My whole point is that if we want the clean racing we're all
> after, we
> > need to establish some rules for participation.  We don't need
> to
> > establish new and exciting rules for when it's okay to pass, -
> we need
> > to establish rules that we can cite when we warn a driver that
> further
> > misconduct will result in a temporary suspension (or permanent
> > expulsion) from racing with RASCAR.

> > Rules should establish fair play, not artificial passing
> rules.

> I'm inclined to agree with the rest of your post.  Ya got my
> vote.    ;o)

> Brian

Eldre

RASCAR race schedule

by Eldre » Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:16:57



>The only flaw is the 100 page document needed to define the word "Respect"
>:)

That definition depends on if you're the President or not...<g>

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
My .sig file is in the shop for repairs...

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

John Simmon

RASCAR race schedule

by John Simmon » Fri, 26 Jul 2002 06:10:50


says...

Tact?  I ain't no politician, never claimed to be, never tried to be,
and I'm not about to change.  Besides, no amount of tact will work with
a certain portion of the population. I don't won't call people names in
my race recaps, but I won't hesitate to label a "stupid passing move" as
such, consequences be damned.

Now, would you rather see an recap from someone that calls it like he
sees it, or from somone that wouldn't say "shit" even if he had a
mouthful of it? I know which one I'd pick, and he wouldn't be fighting
with his conscience.

--
=========================================================
Redneck Techno-Biker & "programming deity"
  http://www.paddedwall.org/john
DeMONS/1 for Nascar Racing 3 & Nascar Legends
  http://www.paddedwall.org/demons
DeMONS/2 for Nascar Racing 4 and 2002 Season (in development)
  http://www.paddedwall.org/demons2
RASCAR Roster
  http://www.paddedwall.org/rascar
Barbarian Diecast Collector (490+ cars and counting)
  http://www.paddedwall.org/diecast

If you want to send me email, go to the first URL shown
above & click "Send Me Mail" in the contents frame.
=========================================================

grubba

RASCAR race schedule

by grubba » Fri, 26 Jul 2002 07:11:37

Well, heres the deal. I live about 11 miles from the CO. After putting in
the midspan repeater, it working great with great quality and better
latency. My cost is approx 69.00 month for 200hours usage. It includes two
phone lines and has call waiting , forwarding, call id, and all of the other
basic stuff. Our other phone line was 44.00 a month for one phone and all of
the goodies like caller id, forwarding, ect. The extra 25.00 a month is
chicken feed when you look at what i had verses what i got now. If I had
added another phone line, the cost would have been compariable. We do not
use nowhere near 200hours per month so that part fits good. The upfront cost
was 169.00 for the installation (which was a steel considering the time they
put in), and the Zyxel usb Isdn external TA modem. I canceled my regular
phone service and haven't regretted it yet. The modem in pluged into the UPS
and so my service should be up even though we might have power failure.
    In my neck of the woods, the phone company never suggested ISDN as an
option to DSL. It was almost like they had to install it once I requested
it. I thought that I was going to be forever banished to high latency and
bad quality for living in the sticks but have since found out that there is
hope for those who have poor regular phone service and live within 60,000
feet of their CO.
grub

> Other than the bill, you're going to love ISDN for online *** :)

> -Larry



> > Your wish has come true. I finally got this ISDN beast up and running.
> > Instead of getting pings in the 500-850 range, I've been getting around
> 110
> > on average tonight with a standard deviation of about 30. If it keeps
> > working half this good, I will be on cloud nine. The only problem is
that
> I
> > can't blame my mistakes on my connection anymore....:(

grubba

RASCAR race schedule

by grubba » Fri, 26 Jul 2002 07:20:22

Do it John. Its time for your expertise.
This ought to be good. I enjoyed your obervations. Just be gentle on me and
*** everyone else....except Eldred. Be gentle on Eldred. Oh, be gentle
on Ump, he's already been flamed. Oh , and be gentle on...........and on.
grub   :)
Mitch Alatorr

RASCAR race schedule

by Mitch Alatorr » Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:51:49

I guess I'm "certain portion" in this so I'll revisit also..

Had you ever watched the replay in question (that I did send you btw) you
would have seen whom was at fault.  YOUR replay showed different.....  The
end...  I thought we were done with this thread quite some time ago, why
does it keep coming back?

Certain Portion :-)


snipped.  Besides, no amount of tact will work with
====================

Brian Oste

RASCAR race schedule

by Brian Oste » Fri, 26 Jul 2002 09:44:41

On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 04:13:23 GMT, "B.Farmer"




>> Your wish has come true. I finally got this ISDN beast up and running.
>> Instead of getting pings in the 500-850 range, I've been getting around 110
>> on average tonight with a standard deviation of about 30. If it keeps
>> working half this good, I will be on cloud nine. The only problem is that I
>> can't blame my mistakes on my connection anymore....:(

>Cool, glad to hear you got a better conn...   Only problem is that now *I* will
>have one of the higher lat #s, tho my Quality has always been 99-100.  Since
>moving about 2 mos ago I haven't been able to get *any* kind of broadband, tho
>I'm told it'll be "real soon, now" ... yeah right.  :o/

>Brian

Actually, I believe that quality is better than ping times (latency).
If you have poor quality it means that packets are constantly having
to be re-sent.

Brian Oster


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.