If so - this I gotta have....
URL please...
Cheers..
--
ed_
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"Det er nok ingen ovn, men fartsm?leren v?r."
> > So Tom you are saying that the change in drivers doubles the speed of N4
and
> > you are certain the vysnc is turned off? Well it just seems mighty odd
that
> > the new driver frame rate is double the old one. All Iam saying is the
way
> > games work that its quite plain that something is waiting for a vsync in
N4
> > and the old drivers could have been running at just under 60 frames or
so
> > (being forced by the vsync top 30) and with the new drivers running at
60+
> > being forced to 60.
> whaa? your monitor can do 30Hz refresh?
> --
> Gunnar
> #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
> "Det er nok ingen ovn, men fartsm?leren v?r."
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"a language is a dialect with an army and a navy"
> > If the monitor rate is 60hz but the game runs at 59 frames the vsync
lock
> > will make it run at 30Hz, agreed?
> no. you'll probably get 45 on average. that is, 1 frame displayed
> once, and the next displayed twice.
> --
> Gunnar
> #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
> "a language is a dialect with an army and a navy"
> > > If the monitor rate is 60hz but the game runs at 59 frames the vsync
> lock
> > > will make it run at 30Hz, agreed?
> > no. you'll probably get 45 on average. that is, 1 frame displayed
> > once, and the next displayed twice.
> No you wouldnt, it dosnt work that way, the program will wait for the vsync,
> it will lock to 30hz.
besides; if a program can draw an average of 59FPS, that doesn't mean
one frame takes 1/59 seconds to draw.
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
silence is FOO!
> > > > If the monitor rate is 60hz but the game runs at 59 frames the vsync
> > lock
> > > > will make it run at 30Hz, agreed?
> > > no. you'll probably get 45 on average. that is, 1 frame displayed
> > > once, and the next displayed twice.
> > No you wouldnt, it dosnt work that way, the program will wait for the vsync,
> > it will lock to 30hz.
> we're both right, actually. :) it depends on whether you wait for
> vsync to draw, or wait for vsync to swap buffers.
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
silence is FOO!
> > > > If the monitor rate is 60hz but the game runs at 59 frames the vsync
> > lock
> > > > will make it run at 30Hz, agreed?
> > > no. you'll probably get 45 on average. that is, 1 frame displayed
> > > once, and the next displayed twice.
> > No you wouldnt, it dosnt work that way, the program will wait for the
vsync,
> > it will lock to 30hz.
> we're both right, actually. :) it depends on whether you wait for
> vsync to draw, or wait for vsync to swap buffers.
> besides; if a program can draw an average of 59FPS, that doesn't mean
> one frame takes 1/59 seconds to draw.
> --
> Gunnar
> #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
> silence is FOO!
| Agreed :O)
|
| > > >
| > > > > If the monitor rate is 60hz but the game runs at 59 frames the
vsync
| > > lock
| > > > > will make it run at 30Hz, agreed?
| > > >
| > > > no. you'll probably get 45 on average. that is, 1 frame displayed
| > > > once, and the next displayed twice.
| > >
| > > No you wouldnt, it dosnt work that way, the program will wait for the
| vsync,
| > > it will lock to 30hz.
| >
| > we're both right, actually. :) it depends on whether you wait for
| > vsync to draw, or wait for vsync to swap buffers.
| >
| > besides; if a program can draw an average of 59FPS, that doesn't mean
| > one frame takes 1/59 seconds to draw.
| >
| > --
| > Gunnar
| > #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo:
2
| > silence is FOO!
|
|
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.276 / Virus Database: 145 - Release Date: 9/3/2001
<snipped>
| uh, and it depends on whether you have one or two back buffers.
| dammit, this is complicated. :)
|
| --
| Gunnar
| #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
| silence is FOO!
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.276 / Virus Database: 145 - Release Date: 9/3/2001
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"a poster is a human being or the software equivalent"
|
| > ya'all confused the hell out of me!! :(
|
| not to worry. I confuse myself on a regular basis. :)
|
|
|
| --
| Gunnar
| #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
| "a poster is a human being or the software equivalent"
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.276 / Virus Database: 145 - Release Date: 9/3/2001
They doubled the N4 FPS on my system.......if yours is identical to
mine....then they are likely to do the same. If not...who knows? Please
note, they did not double the FPS on System #2.....only System #1 that I
reported here. Although, System #2 did show an increase in both the
3DMark2001 scores and the N4 FPS.....it wasn't as substantial.
Hope that's clear?
Tom
