rec.autos.simulators

> > What happened to the hardware reviews? I've always thought that  Loyd
> > Case does a really good job.

>   I got ALOT of problems with the new design.

>   Did any of their people actually bother to LOOK at the
> thing?  Did they try to read the tiny white on black type?
> From further then 3 inches away?  On a 1024 x 768 setting?

>   Why is there no easy way to get to a games general info
> page with the rating, publisher info, links to both user and
> site reviews, etc?  For archived titles, the only way seems to
> be to go directly to the review and then jump to the info
> page.  Foolish.

>   Could they take up even more room with their logo bar
> and ad banner?

>   I could list more, but  looking at the site for reference is
> giving me a headache.

>   Too bad.  I was always pleased with their coverage, reviews,
> etc.  I'm gonna hafta find another site to get that stuff from now.

>   Dobe

> > >   Did any of their people actually bother to LOOK at the
> > thing?  Did they try to read the tiny white on black type?
> > From further then 3 inches away?  On a 1024 x 768 setting?

> > Did you ever try INCREASING the TEXT SIZE in your browser?
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Kennewell,
> > Canberra, Australia.
> > ---------------------------

> > > >   Did any of their people actually bother to LOOK at the
> > > thing?  Did they try to read the tiny white on black type?
> > > From further then 3 inches away?  On a 1024 x 768 setting?

>> Huh?
>> Has modern living reduced your physical ability to move and click your
>mouse
>> more than once?!

>  Why should I (or anyone else) be required to compensate
>for someone else's bad design practices?