rec.autos.simulators

by **Eldre** » Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:53:19

>Starship Troopers...

>-Larry

>> >After using this quote I had to put that DVD on my
>> >"movies-to-watch-again-stack" ;)

>> Robocop?

Damn - wrong futuristic movie... :-) I actually *liked* ST, too.

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **Larr** » Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:12:50

Wow, now that I look at it, I sure did butcher it didn't I LOL

-Larry

> LOL

> --
> Tim White

> > Indubidubly.

by **Larr** » Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:13:34

I do belive you are correct! Give that man a Doggy Biscuit :)

-Larry

> I think it was called the "Zombie" racing server.
> I ran it a few times.
> They had special arcade setups available for download.

> > It's definitely there, Eldred. There was a Dega server at one time on
> > Sierra (may still be there) where this was not only condoned, but was
> > required, to race there.

> > -Larry

> > > writes:

> > > >Hmm, that got me thinking.......(smell the smoke)

> > > >yup, it still works in n2003. ooppss.. did I let the cat out of the
bag
> > > >with that? I though everyone knew about that. Hell, thats the only
cheat
> > I
> > > >know for this damn game.

> > > Well, I'd never even *heard* of it before. But since I don't race
arcade
> > mode,
> > > I guess I don't have to worry about it...

> > > Eldred
> > > --
> > > Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> > > Member
> > > Screamers Racing League
> > > IICC League
> > > GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
> > > ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
> > > Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
> > > N2k3 rank:in progress

> > > Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **Larr** » Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:15:15

Yes, it certainly was different :) It was a fun change too. 240mph packs
:)

I quit running it because it turned into a bunch of 'good old boys' running
the low line for 50 laps.

-Larry

by **Larr** » Sun, 30 Nov 2003 13:20:20

I was hoping for a Sequel :)

-Larry

writes:

> >Starship Troopers...

> >-Larry

> >> >After using this quote I had to put that DVD on my
> >> >"movies-to-watch-again-stack" ;)

> >> Robocop?

> Damn - wrong futuristic movie... :-) I actually *liked* ST, too.

> Eldred
> --
> Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> Member
> Screamers Racing League
> IICC League
> GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
> ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
> Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
> N2k3 rank:in progress

> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **Neil Charlto** » Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:52:10

Funny thing is, so do I ;)

> > hehe

> > indubitably

> > ADVERB: It is so; as you say or ask: absolutely, agreed, all
right,
> > assuredly, aye, gladly, roger, undoubtedly, unquestionably, willingly,
> yea,
> > yes. Informal : OK, uh-huh, yeah, yep. Slang : right on. See AFFIRM.

> I like it better the way Larry spelled it.

by **Tim** » Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:11:56

Who cares, I just thought it was great seeing someone use that word.
:)

--
Tim White

> Wow, now that I look at it, I sure did butcher it didn't I LOL

> -Larry

> > LOL

> > --
> > Tim White

> > > Indubidubly.

by **Larr** » Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:39:55

:)

-Larry

> Who cares, I just thought it was great seeing someone use that word.
> :)

> --
> Tim White

> > Wow, now that I look at it, I sure did butcher it didn't I LOL

> > -Larry

> > > LOL

> > > --
> > > Tim White

> > > > Indubidubly.

by **Gerald Moo** » Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:50:06

> IIRC, The Racesevers people were looking at a client-side app that would
> check out all the client's running progs at the time of an event to assure
> no one was running any TSRs that could hack memory addresses and or change
> values once the sim was running and connected to one of their rated servers.
> At the end of a race, the app produced a report that is sent to RS and
> checked for *illegal* activities before the scoring was made official.

The problem with *anything* running on the client (aside from
spyware/malware concerns) is that it could probably be hacked just as
readily as the game itself.

Maybe when Windows Longhorn comes along, things will get better, at
least in this regard. If anyone is still making racing sims, that is.

Gerald

by **Eldre** » Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:02:03

I'm not familiar with Leghorn(other than Foghorn), but wouldn't *everyone* need
to be running said OS?

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Member
Screamers Racing League
IICC League
GPLRank -2.4 MoGPL rank +302.38
ChallengeRank +54.48 MoC +743.77
Hist. +82.82 MoH in progress
N2k3 rank:in progress

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **Larr** » Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:14:41

I just hope NR2003 RUNS when Longhorn comes out.

It's not like we'll see a patch to fix it.

-Larry

by **Gerald Moo** » Fri, 05 Dec 2003 07:30:20

> (Gerald Moore) writes:

> >Maybe when Windows Longhorn comes along, things will get better, at
> >least in this regard. If anyone is still making racing sims, that is.

> I'm not familiar with Leghorn(other than Foghorn), but wouldn't *everyone* need to be running said OS?

Presumeably, yes. And of course, the software would have to be
written to take advantage of its security features. Whether or not
any of its features will be of any benefit in preventing cheating, I
have no information.

rec.autos.simulators

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.

NR2003 cheating.