rec.autos.simulators

by **Steve Garrot** » Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:00:00

Must be using the OpenGL Patch for GPL, known to cause mirror errors!
I have yet to find children wandering around in GPL though . . .

SLG
(BTW: The would be a sarcastic post!)
(The real solution is to remove reverse from all vehicles!)

>Wassamatta, no mirrors?
>Sounds great but Plymouth/Dodge is offering a system like that on the 2000
>yr minivans.
>I wish you the best however.
>JM

>> I have the greatest choice of car reverse sensors which help driver
>> during reversing of the car .

>> The simplest of such devices warn the driver by means of pulsing sound
>> alarm about any obstacle . More comfortable have besides sound warning
>> a distance measure and even inform which part of the car (left or
>> right ) can strike against the post of the traffic signs or rubbish
>> container.

>> The devices are switched on automatically after putting the car in
>> reverse mode.

>> Besides I deal with trading in cheap and reliable Eurosec auto
>> alarms.

>> I am interested in contacts with companies trading in car accessories
>> and dealing with installations of electronic equipment.

>> The above mentioned equipment you will find in Internet :
>> www.eurosec.com.pl

(All spelling errors are intentional and are there to show new
and improved ways of spelling old words. Grammatical errors are
due to too many English classes/teachers)

by **Daxe Rexfor** » Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:00:00

>Must be using the OpenGL Patch for GPL, known to cause mirror errors!
>I have yet to find children wandering around in GPL though . . .

>SLG
>(BTW: The would be a sarcastic post!)
>(The real solution is to remove reverse from all vehicles!)

I advocate having a spotter positioned on the roof of the vehicle,
communicating with the driver through a radio headset.

~daxe

-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including Dedicated Binaries Servers ==-----

by **Bryan Wagone** » Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:00:00

You aren't using the same email address as the original spammer, but you sure are strongly in his
corner. I have two email addresses. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Bryan

> Hey, ***er. Check the thread! It wasn't _me_ who posted the original announcement!

> > Apparently I did not "just_have_to own" one since I passed on it (as I said in my post). But,
> > even if I had bought it, I'd hardly call a 2 door S-10 Blazer an urban assualt vehicle since it
> > only weighs in at around 3500 lbs. For a person that knows so little about American cars, I'm
> > wondering why you chose automotive add-on junk as your product to spam the world with? Shouldn't
> > you be selling the "100 year Stay-Sharp Kitchen Knife" or some other very useful item?

> > Bryan

> > > An "SUV"? That yet another acronym for one of those urban *** vehicles that you folk who
> > > had deprived childhoods just _have_ to own?

> > > > No, my vehicles come with satisfactory mirrors. There is no need to take apart the
> > > > bathroom. You want to hear a funny story? Last year, I was considering buying an SUV.

> > > -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
> > > http://www.racesimcentral.net/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
> > > ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including Dedicated Binaries Servers ==-----

> -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
> ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including Dedicated Binaries Servers ==-----

by **Michael Barlo** » Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:00:00

> The recent post titled "GPL fans read this" went over 200 replies, I
> stopped counting.
> Yes it was me who started it. Funny thing is there were no negative
> posts in response.
> JM

> > This has to be the longest damn thread ever!!!

What was that thread about? I saw the subject line and just figured it
came from someone who had to vent. Then all the replies were from other
venting back at the original post. so I never read any of them. So,
What was that thread about?

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
http://members.xoom.com/BarlowRacing/

Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
Holodyne Engineering
Mystic Music
(have Your !!Name/Address!! placed here)

by **john moor** » Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:00:00

The recent post titled "GPL fans read this" went over 200 replies, I
stopped counting.
Yes it was me who started it. Funny thing is there were no negative
posts in response.
JM

by **Andre Warrin** » Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:00:00

The 'READ THIS!' thread was a stupid adverti***t, but the 'GPL fans
read this!' thread was a thank you thread to all the people that have
worked and still work on GPL.

Andre

On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 23:38:46 -0500, Michael Barlow

>> The recent post titled "GPL fans read this" went over 200 replies, I
>> stopped counting.
>> Yes it was me who started it. Funny thing is there were no negative
>> posts in response.
>> JM

>> > This has to be the longest damn thread ever!!!

> What was that thread about? I saw the subject line and just figured it
>came from someone who had to vent. Then all the replies were from other
>venting back at the original post. so I never read any of them. So,
>What was that thread about?

>--
>=========================================
>Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
>=========================================
>http://www.racesimcentral.net/

>Racing online with the help of......

>Race Communications Association
>Holodyne Engineering
>Mystic Music
>(have Your !!Name/Address!! placed here)

by **Tim Vanhe** » Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:00:00

No bad idea, and give every car a +400bhp engine and rear wheel drive so we
don't need a reverse to turn our car in narrow places...
Now that will improve safety.

by **Tim Vanhe** » Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:00:00

This must be the longest thread about a spam ever.

by **Peter Ive** » Fri, 31 Dec 1999 04:00:00

Au contraire, I remember a thread to do with the Ferrari bargeboards
legality that went on for at least 200 articles and may have been much
more. :-)
--
Peter Ives - (AKA Ivington)

No person's opinions can be said to be
more correct than another's, because each is
the sole judge of his or her own experience.