rec.autos.simulators

*Real* GPL at Coys

Richard G Cleg

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Richard G Cleg » Tue, 03 Aug 1999 04:00:00

  [Many apologies if there are any inaccuracies in the following - I'm
working entirely from memory here].

  Not _quite_ on topic but any GPL fans who were not at Coy Historic
festival, Silverstone this weekend missed a real treat.  Some
magnificent racing and some authentic cars from the era.  I've probably
forgotten half of the GPL relevant stuff but, to a GPL fanatics the
highlights would perhaps be:

  1) Seeing (and hearing) a '67 BRM in full flight with the engine
roaring.  (Alas it wasn't the beloved H16 - there was a 67 H16 on
display).  Incidentally - I noticed that the V16 BRM has a slightly
offset steering wheel - which the H16 in GPL doesn't.

  2) Seeing an ex-Jim Clark Lotus 48 F2 fighting with the big boys in
the Pre 72 GP and Tasman race.  It came in an extremely creditable
fourth running against guys with wings, slicks and twice the engine
size.  Beautiful car and brilliant drive.  I got a good view of it in
the garage before the race and it really was a thing of beauty.  It was
unbelievably nimble round the corners of the complex.  (Now there's a
section that would make '67 silverstone incredibly difficult).

  3) GPL being played on a widescreen TV in one of the pit garages with
the driver sat in an actual Lotus***pit - not sure what lotus it was
but it looked pretty much like "the real thing" (Lotus 49) to me.  I
didn't get a chance to show off my "skills" - don't think I'd have
fitted into the***pit easily anyway - being quite tall and broad - but
it was great to see.  [I couldn't help wincing watching someone drive
Monza - you KNOW when someone is a good couple of seconds past their
braking point].

  4) Jacky Ickx (did I spell that right) driving round on one of the
demo laps - alas he didn't race.

  5) Bright orange ex-Dan Gurney Mclaren was raced.  (and it was a
really weird looking beast big wings slick tyres).

  6) Also a lovely ex JYS BRM H16 was on display.  I think it was the
'67 model but I'm not sure.

  I presume there were some other people on this group about for that
weekend so they can catch me on anything I've missed or got wrong.  It
was a great great weekend.

  There was also a huge presence from the upcoming Microsoft game
"Spirit of Speed" which looks like it might be a real winner.  It was,
of course, hard to judge how "sim" it was...  but a few things that
could be told:

  They're pretty damn serious about marketting it - they'd sponsored the
pre-war sports car race and all the cars were carrying "spirit of speed"
stickers.  The screen shots which were played on the big diamond screens
all weekend looked pretty beautiful - to me it looks like it'll be a
better looking game than GPL is.  Obviously, hard to judge the physics
of the thing but it's a good sign that in a short interview on
Silverstone TV the guy did mention that the physics had to be extremely
detailed "to deal with the banking at brooklands for example".  Tracks
mentionned included Brooklands and Avis and one other I didn't quite
catch - sounded like montreux (but I'm not familiar with the 30s tracks
so I don't know).  They also said that if it was successful then it
would be a series with 50s cars a probable next release - release date
October.  I'm looking forward to it.

--
Richard G. Clegg     Only the mind is waving
Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.

www: http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Ed Ba

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Ed Ba » Tue, 03 Aug 1999 04:00:00

On 2 Aug 1999 11:42:29 GMT,


Monthlery (spelling?)

--
* rrevved at mindspring dot com  

Lotus 4

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Lotus 4 » Tue, 03 Aug 1999 04:00:00

Hi Richard
Yes I was there too. Brilliant. I wonder if it was me you were watching
driving a bit of GPL. I asked the guy to change from Silverstone to Monza
and did a few laps. Unfortunately he left the autoshift on which made for
very slow laps (1m40 or so). I too will be interested to try the new
Microprose games, but they'll have to be amazing to beat GPL. I'd like to
try Brooklands though.
Tim Leighton



Richard G Cleg

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Richard G Cleg » Tue, 03 Aug 1999 04:00:00

: Hi Richard
: Yes I was there too. Brilliant. I wonder if it was me you were watching
: driving a bit of GPL. I asked the guy to change from Silverstone to Monza
: and did a few laps. Unfortunately he left the autoshift on which made for
: very slow laps (1m40 or so). I too will be interested to try the new
: Microprose games, but they'll have to be amazing to beat GPL. I'd like to
: try Brooklands though.
: Tim Leighton

  Guy I saw driving was going round Monza - wore a floppy brown felt
hat. But they seemed to leave it on Monza for a while - I guess because it's
much easier so I saw a few people drive that course.  Looked fun - did
you find what the chassis they were using was?

--
Richard G. Clegg     Only the mind is waving
Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.

www: http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html

Bruce Kennewel

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
attended Coys.
He said that the "Spirit of Speed" display also impressed him no end.
Apparently the physics in the finished game will (quote) "make for a far
easier driving experience than GPL" (unquote).
(I don't know how much truth there is in this statement, which is purported
to come from a Hasbro rep at Coys.)



>   [Many apologies if there are any inaccuracies in the following - I'm
> working entirely from memory here].

>   Not _quite_ on topic but any GPL fans who were not at Coy Historic
> festival, Silverstone this weekend missed a real treat.  Some
> magnificent racing and some authentic cars from the era.  I've probably
> forgotten half of the GPL relevant stuff but, to a GPL fanatics the
> highlights would perhaps be:

>   1) Seeing (and hearing) a '67 BRM in full flight with the engine
> roaring.  (Alas it wasn't the beloved H16 - there was a 67 H16 on
> display).  Incidentally - I noticed that the V16 BRM has a slightly
> offset steering wheel - which the H16 in GPL doesn't.

>   2) Seeing an ex-Jim Clark Lotus 48 F2 fighting with the big boys in
> the Pre 72 GP and Tasman race.  It came in an extremely creditable
> fourth running against guys with wings, slicks and twice the engine
> size.  Beautiful car and brilliant drive.  I got a good view of it in
> the garage before the race and it really was a thing of beauty.  It was
> unbelievably nimble round the corners of the complex.  (Now there's a
> section that would make '67 silverstone incredibly difficult).

>   3) GPL being played on a widescreen TV in one of the pit garages with
> the driver sat in an actual Lotus***pit - not sure what lotus it was
> but it looked pretty much like "the real thing" (Lotus 49) to me.  I
> didn't get a chance to show off my "skills" - don't think I'd have
> fitted into the***pit easily anyway - being quite tall and broad - but
> it was great to see.  [I couldn't help wincing watching someone drive
> Monza - you KNOW when someone is a good couple of seconds past their
> braking point].

>   4) Jacky Ickx (did I spell that right) driving round on one of the
> demo laps - alas he didn't race.

>   5) Bright orange ex-Dan Gurney Mclaren was raced.  (and it was a
> really weird looking beast big wings slick tyres).

>   6) Also a lovely ex JYS BRM H16 was on display.  I think it was the
> '67 model but I'm not sure.

>   I presume there were some other people on this group about for that
> weekend so they can catch me on anything I've missed or got wrong.  It
> was a great great weekend.

>   There was also a huge presence from the upcoming Microsoft game
> "Spirit of Speed" which looks like it might be a real winner.  It was,
> of course, hard to judge how "sim" it was...  but a few things that
> could be told:

>   They're pretty damn serious about marketting it - they'd sponsored the
> pre-war sports car race and all the cars were carrying "spirit of speed"
> stickers.  The screen shots which were played on the big diamond screens
> all weekend looked pretty beautiful - to me it looks like it'll be a
> better looking game than GPL is.  Obviously, hard to judge the physics
> of the thing but it's a good sign that in a short interview on
> Silverstone TV the guy did mention that the physics had to be extremely
> detailed "to deal with the banking at brooklands for example".  Tracks
> mentionned included Brooklands and Avis and one other I didn't quite
> catch - sounded like montreux (but I'm not familiar with the 30s tracks
> so I don't know).  They also said that if it was successful then it
> would be a series with 50s cars a probable next release - release date
> October.  I'm looking forward to it.

> --
> Richard G. Clegg     Only the mind is waving
> Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.

> www: http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Jan Verschuere

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and absolute
*** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend of
mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll ask)
for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much involved
in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was going..."

So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

Jan.
------


>Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
><snip>

Jan Verschuere

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and absolute
*** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend of
mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll ask)
for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much involved
in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was going..."

So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

Jan.
------


>Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
><snip>

Jan Verschuere

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and absolute
*** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend of
mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll ask)
for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much involved
in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was going..."

So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

Jan.
------


>Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
><snip>

Jan Verschuere

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and absolute
*** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend of
mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll ask)
for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much involved
in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was going..."

So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

Jan.
------


>Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
><snip>

Jan Verschuere

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and absolute
*** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend of
mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll ask)
for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much involved
in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was going..."

So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

Jan.
------


>Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
><snip>

Jan Verschuere

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and absolute
*** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend of
mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll ask)
for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much involved
in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was going..."

So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

Jan.
------


>Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
><snip>

Michae

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Michae » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00


Yes, SOS looked good when I saw it at E3, but I do think they're aiming
it at a bit broader market than GPL. I found the car, an Auto-Union, much
easier to drive than a GPL car.

I will buy it though, and I hope someone converts GPL's Nurburgring so we
can re-create*** Seaman's famous victory just before the war:-)

- Michael

Richard G Cleg

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Richard G Cleg » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

: Yes, SOS looked good when I saw it at E3, but I do think they're aiming
: it at a bit broader market than GPL. I found the car, an Auto-Union, much
: easier to drive than a GPL car.

  Well, perhaps I'm a bit unique but I do believe that it's problems
with GPL's physics model which make it so difficult to drive -
specifically I think there's something peculiar about the way they have
calculated tyre grip when the tyres are at an angle and also the
assumption about a totally rigid chassis.  My feeling was pretty
much confirmed (to my mind) by what I saw at Coys.  In the hands of
drivers who I'm sure are extremely competent but are nonetheless mainly
gentleman amateurs with extremely limited test time * the cars looked
much more controllable than GPL cars.  Can you imagine in a GPL style
car being able to overtake round the outside of Luffield even at
"taking it easy" pace - and these guys weren't taking it _that_ easy.

  In short, I don't believe it's a bad thing that "Spirit of Speed" will
be easier than GPL - it may still be more "realistic" and it may not.
Let's wait and see.

  Oh, if anyone's interested, I timed the Ex Jim Clark F2 Lotus 48
(this has the 1.5L engine) at 1.53 round modern silverstone (which must
surely be much tougher and slower in those cars than the 67 Silverstone).

  * This is not meant to sound disrespectful - the racers were extremely
good - but many of them were on that track for the first time in cars
they don't race often.

--
Richard G. Clegg     Only the mind is waving
Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.

www: http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html

Bruce Kennewel

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Bruce Kennewel » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

I'm just hoping that there is a goodly degree of the same types of physics
as we experience in GPL, Jan, and that the whole kit-kaboodle isn't toned
down to the level of an "arcade".

If the era to be depicted is the mid-to-late 1930s then advance/retard,
pumping of lubricant and pressurizing of fuel tank, outside mecahnical brake
on rear wheels etc. should not be part of the sim.
What you are thinking of sounds more like the mid-to-late 1920s.......when
the Bugattis were at their peak.  Is this the period that they are
representing, or is it the 1930s?


> uh-oh..... you no doubt know that, in reality,  these cars were and
absolute
> *** to drive (adjusting ignition timing on the fly and stuff). A friend
of
> mine (national FF-2000 driver) drove one  (1934 Bugatti I think.. I'll
ask)
> for a commercial and they had to use video postprocessing to make it look
> like he was moving at racing speed. His comment "there was so much
involved
> in just driving the thing I hardly got a chance to see where I was
going..."

> So we're talking a sim content like TOCA2 at best?? -Where is simracing
> going if even Papy can't seem to better themselves (re: Nascar 3)?? Are we
> reduced to hoping Geoff can bring home the goods (fat chance IMO)??

> Jan.
> ------

> >Richard, I just received an e-mail from a good friend (in Wales) who also
> ><snip>

Lotus 4

*Real* GPL at Coys

by Lotus 4 » Wed, 04 Aug 1999 04:00:00

This is an interesting topic. I must say I have examined a lot of footage of
'66/'67 F1 cars and they seem to behave pretty much more like they do in GPL
than at Coy's. An accessible example is the overhead footage of '66 GP races
in the film 'Grand Prix'. You can clearly see cars are sliding and spinning
in an out of control manner as a result of too much or too little power
application. Also similar events are apparent in the Watkins Glen and
Nurburgring sequences in 'Nine Days in Summer'.
So what accounts for the tractability of the cars at Coy's and the obvious
difficulties in driving GPL? It may indeed be that the physics model is
imperfect but I think there are simpler explanations, particularly bearing
in mind that once mastered (and not driven by the sim-meisters like Woeger
who clearly have special skills), GPL produces VERY similar lap times to
those turned in the actual '67 season.This implies to me an uncannily
accurate model.
The tyres at Coy's all felt very sticky to me, at least as sticky as the
slicks on the 71 Brabham. I wonder who makes these tyres today and what
compound they are using.
A 1500cc F2 is fast but lacks the brute unsuitability of 400bhp in a
half-ton package. Most of the F1 cars at Coy's had wings (there were no 3
litre mid 60s F1 cars racing ) and the more powerful cars were driven by
people like Duncan Dayton or Martin Stretton who are effectively
professional racing drivers. Also they weren't going flat out and who can
blame them (two thirds of the drivers who started the '67 F1 season died at
the wheel of a car). The current  Lap Record for F3000 at Silverstone is
1m41.xx and the F3 LR is 1m43.xx (Grand Prix circuit) whereas Duncan
Dayton's average racing lap in the BT33 was about 1m50, and Simon Hadfield
in the Lotus 48 was 1m56 or so, on the slightly easier and faster Historic
circuit (no Abbey chicane). I bet Jim Clark would have driven race laps
around 1m35 in a '67 Lotus 49.
I think the real reason why GPL is so hard to drive has more to do with the
deficiencies of PC controllers and their difference from real cars. The real
masters of sim racing do not spin and come off all the time, and if you
watch, say, Rick Prydden racing it is a truly awesome sight the speed he
carries round corners and the car control he has. Moreover he not only turns
world class hotlaps but can race hard off the racing line. So talent and
practice can compensate for the lack of realistic physical feedback. I
predict that the less talented of us will find GPL easier to drive with
Force Feedback (despite its shortcomings) whereas the real experts will be
quicker without.
Anyway I have had more fun with the 'difficult' GPL than with any other sim,
so I hope that other similarly challenging sims emerge in the future. I
imagine that a GPL style 50s sim would be even more difficult because of the
skinny tyres. I would also have to get a huge wood rimmed steering wheel to
make it feel halfway authentic.
I would be interested to hear others' opinions on these matters.
Tim Leighton




> : Yes, SOS looked good when I saw it at E3, but I do think they're aiming
> : it at a bit broader market than GPL. I found the car, an Auto-Union,
much
> : easier to drive than a GPL car.

>   Well, perhaps I'm a bit unique but I do believe that it's problems
> with GPL's physics model which make it so difficult to drive -
> specifically I think there's something peculiar about the way they have
> calculated tyre grip when the tyres are at an angle and also the
> assumption about a totally rigid chassis.  My feeling was pretty
> much confirmed (to my mind) by what I saw at Coys.  In the hands of
> drivers who I'm sure are extremely competent but are nonetheless mainly
> gentleman amateurs with extremely limited test time * the cars looked
> much more controllable than GPL cars.  Can you imagine in a GPL style
> car being able to overtake round the outside of Luffield even at
> "taking it easy" pace - and these guys weren't taking it _that_ easy.

>   In short, I don't believe it's a bad thing that "Spirit of Speed" will
> be easier than GPL - it may still be more "realistic" and it may not.
> Let's wait and see.

>   Oh, if anyone's interested, I timed the Ex Jim Clark F2 Lotus 48
> (this has the 1.5L engine) at 1.53 round modern silverstone (which must
> surely be much tougher and slower in those cars than the 67 Silverstone).

>   * This is not meant to sound disrespectful - the racers were extremely
> good - but many of them were on that track for the first time in cars
> they don't race often.

> --
> Richard G. Clegg     Only the mind is waving
> Dept. of Mathematics (Network Control group) Uni. of York.

> www: http://manor.york.ac.uk/top.html


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.