rec.autos.simulators

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

Eleutherios Athanassio

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Eleutherios Athanassio » Wed, 27 Mar 1996 04:00:00

Good news for all  >P120 owners:

The german magazin PC Player gives in its latest issue (4.96) the
following table on HW requirements for F1GP2 :

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        VGA           SVGA               VGA             SVGA
                                         (full detail)                  (full detail)    (most det. off) (most det. off)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
486    unplayable     unplayable        just playable   unplayable

P90    just playable     unplayable      playable       just playable

P120     playable      unplayable       well playable    well playable

P166   well playable   just playable   well playable   well playable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

where just playable means "not much fun at all..."

-- akis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Markus Schneide

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Markus Schneide » Wed, 27 Mar 1996 04:00:00


>Good news for all  >P120 owners:

>The german magazin PC Player gives in its latest issue (4.96) the
>following table on HW requirements for F1GP2 :

>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                                    VGA           SVGA               VGA             SVGA
>                                     (full detail)                  (full detail)    (most det. off) (most det. off)
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>486    unplayable     unplayable        just playable   unplayable

>P90    just playable     unplayable      playable       just playable

>P120     playable      unplayable       well playable    well playable

>P166   well playable   just playable   well playable   well playable

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

>where just playable means "not much fun at all..."

>-- akis
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

What graphic cards did they use ?

      Markus Morphine

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://rphc1.physik.uni-regensburg.de:80/~scm04312/F1.html
http://rphc1.physik.uni-regensburg.de:80/~ait08097/F1GP.html
http://rphc1.physik.uni-regensburg.de:80/~scm04312/Frentzen.html

WODA

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by WODA » Wed, 27 Mar 1996 04:00:00

Hey Eleutherios Athanassiou !
You burnt somethin' into my screen !

Hey , I read it too and I think that no Pentium 166 could handle the
SVGA graphics . Many other mags like PC Games have the same opinion !
-------------
Und das h?tte so ein sch?nes Spiel werden k?nnen !(oh , sorry)
And that would have been such a nice game !

Ach ja... have you seen a playable demo anywhere ?

          * * * * * *  BYE and always a good connection ! * * * * * *
                * * * * * *         wishes          * * * * * *
                            ***  W  O  D  A  N  ***

Eleutherios Athanassio

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Eleutherios Athanassio » Thu, 28 Mar 1996 04:00:00




>>Good news for all  >P120 owners:

>>The german magazin PC Player gives in its latest issue (4.96) the
>>following table on HW requirements for F1GP2 :

>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>           VGA           SVGA               VGA             SVGA
>>                                         (full detail)                  (full detail)    (most det. off) (most det. off)
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>486    unplayable     unplayable        just playable   unplayable
>>P90    just playable     unplayable      playable       just playable
>>P120     playable      unplayable       well playable    well playable
>>P166   well playable   just playable   well playable   well playable

>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>where just playable means "not much fun at all..."

>What graphic cards did they use ?

>      Markus Morphine

No specs were given on the graphics card, RAM  or whatso ever. They
wrote that there are quite a lot of possible steps between full detail
and no details, but the general conclusion was go and get a P120.

BTW: I liked your F1 pages !

regards
--akis
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Eleutherios Athanassio

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Eleutherios Athanassio » Thu, 28 Mar 1996 04:00:00

Hello Wodan,

Yap.  I guess the HW requirements are the main reason for the delay.
Theyjust had to wait until the P120 came into the low end /private
customer area.

No, only the quicktime movie.

bis die Tage ....

--- akis

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finn

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Finn » Thu, 28 Mar 1996 04:00:00

Found this in a Games-Area :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi All,

Recently, there have been some questions (and rumors) regarding what type
and speed computer will be required to run Grand Prix II.

After discussing this issue with the test team in the UK, here are the
facts...

The VGA version should run reasonably well on a 486DX4/100. If you've got
a 120 pentium, you'll be able to get a good frame rate in SVGA, with full

textures and full mirror detail.
Also the game is fully customizable, so if there is a performance hit you
can turn off the textures on, say, verges, the sky, curbs or whatever. You

can also play the game at three detail levels.

So what does this mean? To get the very best out of the game, yes, you
will
need a powerful machine (which "future-proofs" the product, bearing in  
mind that we would like to add to, not change or upgrade, this game engine

for the next 2-3 years). However, anyone with a DX4 upwards will have a  
good game and get the full benefit of the graphics engine. We currently do

not regard this as an issue.

Regards,
Brian/Spectrum Holobyte-MicroProse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

  CU
  Finn

..    
  .   .        __
  .  . .   .   --==-_()____
    ..   .   . ( o )______(o)__   .-= The race is on ... =-.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
  \ \     Finn Klug                       E-Mail to                     \


  / /   Phone: +49-4103-87494                                      /
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
       ## ... the early bird chatches the worm .... ##

Eldred Picke

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Eldred Picke » Fri, 29 Mar 1996 04:00:00



>Subject: F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements
>Date: 26 Mar 1996 10:17:19 GMT
>Good news for all  >P120 owners:
>The german magazin PC Player gives in its latest issue (4.96) the
>following table on HW requirements for F1GP2 :
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                                        VGA           SVGA               VGA             SVGA
>                                         (full detail)                  (full detail)    (most det. off) (most det. off)
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>486    unplayable     unplayable        just playable   unplayable
>P90    just playable     unplayable      playable       just playable
>P120     playable      unplayable       well playable    well playable
>P166   well playable   just playable   well playable   well playable
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>where just playable means "not much fun at all..."
>-- akis
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

So I guess everyne else is just SOL... :(

I am NOT paranoid.  And why are you always watching me?!?
Eldred Pickett


C Sh

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by C Sh » Sat, 30 Mar 1996 04:00:00

:-) Found this in a Games-Area :
:-)
:-) --------------------------------------------------------------------------
:-) Hi All,
:-)
:-) Recently, there have been some questions (and rumors) regarding what type
:-) and speed computer will be required to run Grand Prix II.
:-)
:-) After discussing this issue with the test team in the UK, here are the
:-) facts...
:-)
:-) The VGA version should run reasonably well on a 486DX4/100. If you've got
:-) a 120 pentium, you'll be able to get a good frame rate in SVGA, with full
:-)
:-) textures and full mirror detail.
:-) Also the game is fully customizable, so if there is a performance hit you
:-) can turn off the textures on, say, verges, the sky, curbs or whatever. You
:-)  
:-) can also play the game at three detail levels.
:-)
:-) So what does this mean? To get the very best out of the game, yes, you
:-) will
:-) need a powerful machine (which "future-proofs" the product, bearing in  
:-) mind that we would like to add to, not change or upgrade, this game engine
:-)  
:-) for the next 2-3 years). However, anyone with a DX4 upwards will have a  
:-) good game and get the full benefit of the graphics engine. We currently do
:-)  
:-) not regard this as an issue.
:-)
:-) Regards,
:-) Brian/Spectrum Holobyte-MicroProse

Hi Brian

I am about to replace my P60 with P166. Would you suggest me to wait a bit for
a even higher performance CPU in order to deliver the best possible result in
the GP2, or would you suggest me that P166 is good enough for GP2? I am
talking about FULL details and with the ADD-ONs that you mentioned above.

Regards

Chris

Looking forward to the GP2

Mark Newma

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Mark Newma » Sun, 31 Mar 1996 04:00:00

As much as I want to believe this, excuse me. Take the 4/100 for VGA at
320x200.

A SVA game at 640x480 is nearly 5 times as demanding graphically
*alone*, and I can't believe a P120 is that much faster than a 4/100.

Anyone?

--
MarkN

Micheal Torph

F1GP2:PC Player on HW Requirements

by Micheal Torph » Sun, 31 Mar 1996 04:00:00


> A SVA game at 640x480 is nearly 5 times as demanding graphically
> *alone*, and I can't believe a P120 is that much faster than a 4/100.

Well, actually, due to a number of features that the pentium posesses, a
pentium120 IS actually _much_ faster than a 486/100.  In fact, a
pentium75 is faster than a 486/120 in many applications and games where
code is optimized for pentiums (an increasing number nowadays).  And this
is on an equal test (16mb ram/diamond stealth 64 w/ 2mb vram).  


  "people who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those doing it."


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.