no.
> >A _games magazine_ is "truely (sic) reliable" ?!!!!!
j
(In the comment I referred to the word "truely". Its correct spelling
is "truly".)
I don't hate you and you're not stupid in asking.
The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked.
> What does "(sic)" mean? I've seen it before.
> Don't hate me because I'm stupid.
> >A _games magazine_ is "truely (sic) reliable" ?!!!!!
> >Surely you jest!
> >>> The only _truely_ reliable info that we have is Geoff Crammond
> confirming GP3 in
> >> an interview with the English magazine PC FORMAT. No dates, no details.
> >--
> >Regards,
> >Bruce.
> >----------
> >The GP Legends Historic Motor Racing Club is located at:-
> >http://www.netspeed.com.au/brucek/legends/
When I read, and when I post... smiley's are included in all messages. I guess I take it for granted that everyone else sees them too.
:-)
--
mark
"You don't actually see the side of the road, you just *know* were it is... and you calmly slide both your outside wheels right to it. Like the bad mamba jamba that you are."
F1RS - http://www.nmia.com/~chaser/car/results.htm
Remove us here and there to mail me.
>You've never seen a Cray, have you, Francois? My Cray runs 67,492 instances of GP2 with >all graphics on at Monaco, at less than 34% PO each.
>F1RS is somewhere near infinity.
As I said before, is it a true rumor that on your Cray supercomputer when
you race at Gp2 you need to take off the sky at Monaco to get a <100%
Occupancy ?
;-)
Aw...
C'mon Mark... didn't you see that smiley under it !!!
To which I say:-
......AND helps to provide the complete TAC air defence data for the
North American continent at the same time!
--
Regards,
Bruce.
----------
The GP Legends Historic Motor Racing Club is located at:-
http://www.netspeed.com.au/brucek/legends/
As long as the circuits simulated the shape/elevation of the real
circuits then they could be called 'A' through 'Z' for all I care. Same
goes for the teams and the drivers names.
--
Regards,
Bruce.
----------
The GP Legends Historic Motor Racing Club is located at:-
http://www.netspeed.com.au/brucek/legends/
> I think that if I were Crammond I would try to publish the game
> myself. No time restraints, no marketing gimmicks, and no compromise.
> I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he has as bad a taste in his
> mouth about how GP2 followed up it's premature release as we do. More
> so I would suspect. By looking at the product, I believe he is a man
> who rates himself by his successes in life. Part of that success might
> be to make sure the next sim does not have the same problems as the
> last. I would take great pride in GP2. It really is a masterpiece.
> Regardless...
> I don't know why an FIA license is important. I don't care about
> drivers names or liveries. Would the tracks be authentic without one?
> The cars? Would everyone here care if there wasn't an FIA license?
l8er
ronny
--
Toys'R'Us '99: "So, would you like a hand gun with that action figure,
kiddo?"
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!
>------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BDB43C.AFDEE5E0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>I think that if I were Crammond I would try to publish the game myself. =
Are you smoking crack?
>Not in the slightest.
>After all, that is what imagination is all about, isn't it folks?! Or
>have you youngsters lost the use of your imagination because your
>entertainment is spoon-fed to you?
>As long as the circuits simulated the shape/elevation of the real
>circuits then they could be called 'A' through 'Z' for all I care. Same
>goes for the teams and the drivers names.
Without an FIA License or at very least an endor***t it will be a very tough
sell to get into retail units when you have FIA License games competing for
the same space.
Z.
> That maybe Bruce, but i think you would have a very hard time convincing any
> Publisher to go with a game referred to as "Geoff Crammond's GP3".
> Without an FIA License or at very least an endor***t it will be a very tough
> sell to get into retail units when you have FIA License games competing for
> the same space.
> Z.
Andy
>Surely you jest!
>>> The only _truely_ reliable info that we have is Geoff Crammond confirming GP3 in
>> an interview with the English magazine PC FORMAT. No dates, no details.
JoH
Please remove *anti-spam* from the email when replying.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
When everything else failed, we can still become im-
mortal by making an enormous blunder....
John Kenneth Galbraith
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
8-)
*Peter* 8-)
(NB: remove asterix to e-mail)
--
mark
"You don't actually see the side of the road, you just *know* were it is...
and you calmly slide both your outside wheels right to it. Like the bad
mamba jamba that you are."
F1RS - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~chaser/car/results.htm
Remove us here and there to mail me.
> That maybe Bruce, but i think you would have a very hard time convincing any
> Publisher to go with a game referred to as "Geoff Crammond's GP3".
> Without an FIA License or at very least an endor***t it will be a very tough
> sell to get into retail units when you have FIA License games competing for
> the same space.
> Z.