is the best, the real point of this discussion was about TV ratings.
If you watch CART you'll see that the cars are also just as evenly
matched, and I think during the last broadcast they mentioned that
there had been 9 different winners in the last 11 races, paraty in
the teams is not what makes NASCAR so popular, like somebody already
mentioned I think NASCAR just does an awesome job marketing its
series, and from what I hear the NASCAR fans are also very brand
loyal, actually buying the products of who sponsors of their favorite
team, this loyalty also attracts lots more sponsorship and allowing more
money to keep the teams and marketing going and so on.
Many of us follow all the racing series, while I don't watch as much
NASCAR as I do CART and F1, I still recognize what NASCAR does right,
you don't have to hate all the other series to be a fan of one of them
(with the exception of the IRL which I hate because they ruined the
Indy500 :-)
Lets not turn r.a.s. into r.a.s.yourfavoriteseries.advocacy
Seeyas on the track.
--John (Joao) Silva
> Driver recognition and advertising are results, not causes.
>NASCAR is more popular than open wheel because the racing is better.
>The cars are more equal and the format leads to a lot of close racing.
>More drivers are known because more drivers have a chance of winning.
>More advertising is done because more people like NASCAR.
> Somebody posted about how much faster the CART cars are. F1
>shows how this could actually hurt, by making car technology ***
>and making passing hard. I happened to watch the F1 German GP.
>Ridiculous. Could anyone imagine saying to Jeremy Mayfield "Jeremy,
>please pull over and let Rusty win the race because he has a shot at
>the Championship". Jeremy would think he'd been put on another
>planet. And Frentzen, 3rd in the championship, saying he had no
>chance of winning it in the press conference. Why? Because he
>doesn't have a Ferrari or a McLaren? If a NASCAR driver said such an
>uncompetitive thing, he'd be fired immediately.
> bob