rec.autos.simulators

SCGT Feedback

Jan Koh

SCGT Feedback

by Jan Koh » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Folks,

We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at Image
Space.
You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now as
well).

Cheers!


??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
Computer Systems Programmer
USAF Air-Ground Operations School
Hurlburt Field, FL

Castle Graphics - http://www.racesimcentral.net/
The Pits - http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Kevin Anderso

SCGT Feedback

by Kevin Anderso » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Your review sounds like it was written by Image Space. I know the game is
not that bad But it is far from the awesome game of the year you describe. I
wonder how much of your reviews are genuine or just advertising. I see the
Pits website in a whole new light now. Corporate advertising has corrupted
another.

--
Kevin Anderson


ICQ # 6769389


>Folks,

>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at Image
>Space.
>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now as
>well).

>Cheers!


>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
>Computer Systems Programmer
>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
>Hurlburt Field, FL

>Castle Graphics - http://www.castlegraphics.com/
>The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/

Dino

SCGT Feedback

by Dino » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Hmmmm! I thought Image Space had already sent the Gold version to EA, with
the proposed release date of early April I would think that to be true.
Sounds like any fixes will be via post release patch. Given that why was the
demo not released months ago to provide ISI time to implement feedback
changes in the final version?

Dino


>Folks,

>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at Image
>Space.
>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now as
>well).

>Cheers!


>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
>Computer Systems Programmer
>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
>Hurlburt Field, FL

>Castle Graphics - http://www.castlegraphics.com/
>The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/

Chris Schlette

SCGT Feedback

by Chris Schlette » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Just have them read the newsgroup (they don't have to respond) and I'm sure
they'd get plenty of feedback from everything thats been said so far on it.
Kevin Anderso

SCGT Feedback

by Kevin Anderso » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

I just read that review again, I still can't believe he is talking about the
same demo. I feel insulted I thought we could only expect the BS hype from
the game companies, now some reviewers are trying to waste my money. I will
never go back to that website again,

--
Kevin Anderson


ICQ # 6769389

>>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
>>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
>>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
>>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at
Image
>>Space.
>>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now
as
>>well).

>>Cheers!


>>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
>>Computer Systems Programmer
>>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
>>Hurlburt Field, FL

>>Castle Graphics - http://www.castlegraphics.com/
>>The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/

Wosc

SCGT Feedback

by Wosc » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Wow its funny when someone posts their opinion about a game that they are
told that "Corporate advertising has corrupted another."  Some people like
this game and all you say is that there must be something wrong with THEM.

Jesse

|Your review sounds like it was written by Image Space. I know the game is
|not that bad But it is far from the awesome game of the year you describe.
I
|wonder how much of your reviews are genuine or just advertising. I see the
|Pits website in a whole new light now. Corporate advertising has corrupted
|another.
|
|--
|Kevin Anderson


|ICQ # 6769389
|
|

|>Folks,
|>
|>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
|>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
|>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
|>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at
Image
|>Space.
|>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now
as
|>well).
|>
|>Cheers!
|>

|>
|>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
|>Computer Systems Programmer
|>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
|>Hurlburt Field, FL
|>
|>Castle Graphics - http://www.castlegraphics.com/
|>The Pits - http://www.theuspits.com/
|>
|>
|
|

Jo

SCGT Feedback

by Jo » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00


>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at Image
>Space.

Surely the SCGT folks read this NG? Plenty of feedback here. It would
be utterly foolish to miss half of it by expecting people who've
already posted to re-email it. Besides, lots of the feedbakc is in
coversational back-and-forth, can't really be emailed.

Joe

Pat Dotso

SCGT Feedback

by Pat Dotso » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00


> Folks,

> We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
> requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
> version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
> will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at Image
> Space.
> You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now as
> well).

Aren't they checking this newsgroup Jan?  Not that there
shouldn't be a direct link from your site, but if they
want feedback, there is plenty right here.

--
Pat Dotson
IMPACT Motorsports
http://www.impactmotorsports.com/pd.html

Mann

SCGT Feedback

by Mann » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Dino, you are absolutely correct.  

Kevin Anderso

SCGT Feedback

by Kevin Anderso » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Thats not a post, thats *** website writing a review. thats sounds like
pure BS written by the game company.

--
Kevin Anderson


ICQ # 6769389


>Wow its funny when someone posts their opinion about a game that they are
>told that "Corporate advertising has corrupted another."  Some people like
>this game and all you say is that there must be something wrong with THEM.

>Jesse


>|Your review sounds like it was written by Image Space. I know the game is
>|not that bad But it is far from the awesome game of the year you describe.
>I
>|wonder how much of your reviews are genuine or just advertising. I see the
>|Pits website in a whole new light now. Corporate advertising has corrupted
>|another.
>|
>|--
>|Kevin Anderson


>|ICQ # 6769389
>|
>|


>|>Folks,
>|>
>|>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and
they've
>|>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the
final
>|>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
>|>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at
>Image
>|>Space.
>|>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now
>as
>|>well).
>|>
>|>Cheers!
>|>

>|>
>|>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
>|>Computer Systems Programmer
>|>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
>|>Hurlburt Field, FL
>|>
>|>Castle Graphics - http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>|>The Pits - http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>|>
>|>
>|
>|

Tom Peterse

SCGT Feedback

by Tom Peterse » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Jan- Manny and others have a point.  ISI's own site shows SCGT going (gone)
gold.

Tom Petersen

Kevin Anderso

SCGT Feedback

by Kevin Anderso » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

before I catch another flame. When I read a review I expect an honest
opinion about the game stating its good points and pointing out its bad.So I
can make a decision before buying it. Luckily I tried the demo myself in
this case, but I feel sorry for those that read the review and then go out
and buy the game. I don't think that demo was bad , but it clearly could
never live up to the praise Jan gave it at the pits website. Makes me mad
cause I think of all the BS E.A. advertised. I want to trust the reviews so
I don't waste money Like I did on Nascar Revolution.

--
Kevin Anderson


ICQ # 6769389


>Thats not a post, thats *** website writing a review. thats sounds like
>pure BS written by the game company.

>--
>Kevin Anderson


>ICQ # 6769389



>>Wow its funny when someone posts their opinion about a game that they are
>>told that "Corporate advertising has corrupted another."  Some people like
>>this game and all you say is that there must be something wrong with THEM.

>>Jesse


>>|Your review sounds like it was written by Image Space. I know the game is
>>|not that bad But it is far from the awesome game of the year you
describe.
>>I
>>|wonder how much of your reviews are genuine or just advertising. I see
the
>>|Pits website in a whole new light now. Corporate advertising has
corrupted
>>|another.
>>|
>>|--
>>|Kevin Anderson


>>|ICQ # 6769389
>>|
>>|


>>|>Folks,
>>|>
>>|>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and
>they've
>>|>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the
>final
>>|>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback,
we
>>|>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at
>>Image
>>|>Space.
>>|>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now
>>as
>>|>well).
>>|>
>>|>Cheers!
>>|>

>>|>
>>|>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
>>|>Computer Systems Programmer
>>|>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
>>|>Hurlburt Field, FL
>>|>
>>|>Castle Graphics - http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>>|>The Pits - http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>>|>
>>|>
>>|
>>|

Mik

SCGT Feedback

by Mik » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

On Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:13:18 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"


>Your review sounds like it was written by Image Space. I know the game is
>not that bad But it is far from the awesome game of the year you describe. I
>wonder how much of your reviews are genuine or just advertising. I see the
>Pits website in a whole new light now. Corporate advertising has corrupted
>another.

What a load of crap! What do you base this speculation on? While I
feel his review was a bit too positive... Nothing leads me to believe
his opinion was bought by a mean old *** money making corporation.

Did someone from a competing company pay you to say this? Do you see
the absurdity?

Mike

Chris Schlette

SCGT Feedback

by Chris Schlette » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Kevin,

Try www.simracingnews.com. :)

We are up to date as possible on ALL forms of racing or at least attempt to
be.  Not to mention, generally the reviews point out both the positives and
negatives of a game.  Of course reviews are always subject to the opinions
of the reviewer and his preference for the game.

Arthur Axelra

SCGT Feedback

by Arthur Axelra » Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Scream at EA not ISI, thats what ISI wanted bad!!!!

Art
Stealth Racing
http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html


>Hmmmm! I thought Image Space had already sent the Gold version to EA, with
>the proposed release date of early April I would think that to be true.
>Sounds like any fixes will be via post release patch. Given that why was
the
>demo not released months ago to provide ISI time to implement feedback
>changes in the final version?

>Dino



>>Folks,

>>We've been in contact with Image Space for several months now, and they've
>>requested for feedback on the demo...so get your comments in for the final
>>version!  You can find a link on our review to email us your feedback, we
>>will make sure that the unedited version gets straight to the guys at
Image
>>Space.
>>You can find our link to the review on our news page...(and the demo now
as
>>well).

>>Cheers!


>>??Jan Kohl??        **The Pits Performance Team**
>>Computer Systems Programmer
>>USAF Air-Ground Operations School
>>Hurlburt Field, FL

>>Castle Graphics - http://www.racesimcentral.net/
>>The Pits - http://www.racesimcentral.net/


1. SCGT Feedback...

2. SCGT Dashes/are scgt.sports-gaming.com's links always bad?

3. SCGT: Techware & The Sim Project Presents: First Ever Prototype for SCGT

4. scgt-help please-dave henrie-scgt

5. SCGT question, What is the largest assortment of SCGT cars on any site?

6. Which non-feedback or feedback 2bbl carb for 1987 caravans?

7. Does a Force Feedback Stick compare with a Force Feedback Wheel?

8. Need feedback on Guillemont's Race Leader Force Feedback Steering Wheel

9. Survey on Force Feedback technology for the PC, pls fill out and email to ---> ryodude@hotmail.com Thanx. - force feedback questionnaire.wpd

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.