Let's be careful about whom we call dumb. Actually the "to" for "too" is
more of an error in recognizing different homonyms than it is a spelling
error.
But then your ellipsis was wrong; it's "..." not "..".
But then that's not covered until 102, so you're excused.
Alanb
<shrug> Big deal. Saw the uni-berlin, etc. and took a guess. Not being
a no life loser net nerd like yourself, and all. Don't you have to go wash
your hands after touching a keyboard about now ?
> What's up with this? Downloading now (83MB).
-Will
>What about the original subject, the GPL 2004 thing. That's what the
>discussion was REALLY about.
>(And as to the readme: of COURSE they had seatbelts! Who makes this stuff
>up?)
Masten Gregory comes to mind (it was he who was famous for the mid-air
leaps during particularly *** crashes wasn't it?)
Jason
It does have the XP friendly video updates...but in the end...it still
is GPL...not GPL 2k4, not GPLxx just GPL, now available for the masses.
dh
> >It looks great...but it sounds awful! What have they done to the SOUND!
> >(And as to the readme: of COURSE they had seatbelts! Who makes this
stuff
> >up?)
> Didn't a lot of mid 50's GP drivers not use seatbelts because they
> were afraid of being stuck in the cars during a fire?
> Masten Gregory comes to mind (it was he who was famous for the mid-air
> leaps during particularly *** crashes wasn't it?)
> Jason
> >Ok, enough of this crap.
> >What about the original subject, the GPL 2004 thing. That's what the
> >discussion was REALLY about.
> Have they added tire wear and pit stops, fixed the general shittiness
> of the tire/suspension models, completely redone all of the tracks
> that were really inaccurate in the original release, and added a new
> (and XP friendly) video renderer? Or is it just a bunch of
> superficial patches that don't really affect the game at all?
> >Ok, enough of this crap.
> >What about the original subject, the GPL 2004 thing. That's what the
> >discussion was REALLY about.
> Have they added tire wear and pit stops, fixed the general shittiness
> of the tire/suspension models, completely redone all of the tracks
> that were really inaccurate in the original release, and added a new
> (and XP friendly) video renderer? Or is it just a bunch of
> superficial patches that don't really affect the game at all?
The reason I'd *really* like pitstops in GPL is for the planned 50's
mod, since they often did pit for fuel and tires then. Tire wear
would be nice just because, while they didn't often change tires in
the early mid engined cars, they weren't exactly riding on fresh
*** after 2 hours.
Jason
Andi.
--
Remove only one zero to reply.
> > Hmm, JP's point precisely, I think. 15-0 to him.
> > Andi.
> You see now why top posting doesn't work, lame brain ?
I would suggest that your problem is with improper quoting of previous
text then rather than top-posting itself. From your comments I would
suggest that you are simply too lazy to bother scrolling down, so in
that context "lame-brain" fits quite nicely imo ;-)
It is polite to edit the quote & bottom-post, it's generally regarded as
impolite to top-post, not edit quoted material or pick up on typo's.
While no one can stop you doing whatever you want, don't be surprised if
people get a little antagonistic ;-)
Malc.
Moronic excuse for top posting #1. The problem you are stating is with
poorly formed bottom posted messages.
--
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
Why would it not be nice to change the standard? If we all top posted we
could ignore the stuff we've already read and quickly scan through what
others have posted. That seems a much more efficient way to me.
--
Remove only one zero to reply.
> >Nope, I don't see bottom posts, have to scroll down, so top posts work
for
> >me. If I'm actively involved in a thread I just want to see the next post
I
> >don't want to scroll down all the rubbish that people tend to put out.
> Moronic excuse for top posting #1. The problem you are stating is with
> poorly formed bottom posted messages.
> --
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
