rec.autos.simulators

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

Zig

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by Zig » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Why NASCAR2 needs alot of work...

1>  Unless you have a "Rendition"  video card you can't play in hi res
mode which leaves you with 2D graphics.  Tech support, as rude as they
were, confirmed this.   I've got a Stealth 3D 2000XL w/ 4MB EDO ram
and I get pretty much the same graphics as a 1MB trident.

2>  The sound quality just plain sucks.  I've got a pentium pro 166,
32MB ram,  a sounblaster awe32-pnp, and TWO sets of Altec Lansing
ACS500 speaker systems - when I play the original NASCAR the room
literally shakes.  When I play NASCAR2 with the proper and same sound
setup all I get is FM quality sound (rather than the engines rumbling
they buzz)  Tech support says it's not coming out with anything to
correct this and its just the difference between the two games.  Even
if I had a rendition card to get the full 3D graphics the sound
quality is so poor I just can't justify the $50!

Basically they rushed to get this game out before Christmas and
neglecting many refinements and failing miserably!!!

Greg Cis

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by Greg Cis » Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:00:00


> Why NASCAR2 needs alot of work...

> 1>  Unless you have a "Rendition"  video card you can't play in hi res
> mode which leaves you with 2D graphics.  Tech support, as rude as they
> were, confirmed this.   I've got a Stealth 3D 2000XL w/ 4MB EDO ram
> and I get pretty much the same graphics as a 1MB trident.

This is how the 3D card phenom works. Just because you purchase a 3D card
does not mean that you can run *any* 3D game. The game must be basicly
re-compiled to support your 3D cards chipset. In some cases if you make
a poor choice in your 3D card selection, you may be stuck with just
the bundled software; i.e. no support.I would have thought that everyone
would realize that 3D cards work this way. This is why I haven't bought
a 3D card yet. I just read *ALOT* about them. IMHO the 3D card scene has
not settled. Unless you just want to run NASCAR/ICR. (Oh a game that really
needs 3D? GP2... Has anyone heard if that was getting 3D support.) Anyway just
think of support for 3D cards in the same light as support for sound-
cards and you will get the main idea.

I didn't know they made PPro 166's. Huh...

Has the sound changed from the demo? I bought the game (xmas gift) based
on the demo looks & sound. The demo ran sounded & looked great. I do not
expect that the game is worse than the demo.

Huh. I guess I will be dissapointed when I open & run the game on Xmas...

John J Par

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by John J Par » Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:00:00



Sounds like you have some tweaking to do on your system. I have a p133
w/24mg edo and can run hi-res with only grass, asphault and horizon turned
off and 14 cars drawn ahead. I don't know what the frame rates are (Is there
something out there that can tell me this since the counter was left out of
the program but not the manual?) but they are at least twice as good as
nascar1. I know the frame rates are above 20, I set the grandstands on auto
and the min frame rate to 20 and the grandstands have never turned off.

Sounds like you setup the sound card in N2 incorrectly. I had the same
problem with my Yamaha sound card. I went back into setup and set the sound
card manually and now it rocks. especially went I hit something (I didn't
mean to :) ) This doesn't seem to be a problem with N2 on my end though,
I've had this happen with several programs of late.

In my opinion N2 is definatly worth it. Although just shop around a little
and you'll find it for under $50. I paid 29.99 at best buy on sale. Compusa
has it on their shelf at 39.99 and that's not on sale.

Now, if someone will just start up a league using N2......

John

Tom Hanse

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by Tom Hanse » Sat, 14 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I was a little disappointed running N2 on my P120 - but with a new found
P200 the sim runs well.  It is definitely a generation one product - I
suspect that it is largely a rewrite, not just an update of N1.  It needs
some fixes and features.  However, the sound is not FM.  The verdict is
still out whether or not I like the drop in engine volume when I let off
the gas - but this is the only real noticeable difference in the sound.  I
suspect you have a sound card problem.  The graphics is quite good in 2D.
Better than N1.  I still don't quite like the roofs of the new cars - they
seem too thin or something.  The driving model is very different and I will
admit that I am struggling with it.  I had gotten very good at running high
and low at most of the tracks - but now I am off the pace in any groove.
This - I think - is caused by a tighter handling race car.  I hope I can
get back on track with setup changes.

I think some of your frustration is due to hardware configuration problems
and the change from N1.  Also, some missing and unpolished items probably
also give an initial reaction of disappointment.  I have tried to reserve
judgement until I race for a while.  The faster CPU has made the experience
a lot better.  The biggest hurdle for me is the missing save race weekend
option.  I think that N2 is a good rev 1 product.  With a few fixes and
additions I hope it will be a great product.  Fix your configuration
problems and give it another try.  If you are still disappointed - make an
itemized list of missing features, bugs, etc.

/THansen

Joel Putt

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by Joel Putt » Sun, 15 Dec 1996 04:00:00



> > Why NASCAR2 needs alot of work...

> > 1>  Unless you have a "Rendition"  video card you can't play in hi res
> > mode which leaves you with 2D graphics.  Tech support, as rude as they
> > were, confirmed this.   I've got a Stealth 3D 2000XL w/ 4MB EDO ram
> > and I get pretty much the same graphics as a 1MB trident.

> This is how the 3D card phenom works. Just because you purchase a 3D card
> does not mean that you can run *any* 3D game. The game must be basicly
> re-compiled to support your 3D cards chipset. In some cases if you make
> a poor choice in your 3D card selection, you may be stuck with just
> the bundled software; i.e. no support.I would have thought that everyone
> would realize that 3D cards work this way. This is why I haven't bought
> a 3D card yet. I just read *ALOT* about them. IMHO the 3D card scene has
> not settled. Unless you just want to run NASCAR/ICR. (Oh a game that really
> needs 3D? GP2... Has anyone heard if that was getting 3D support.) Anyway just
> think of support for 3D cards in the same light as support for sound-
> cards and you will get the main idea.

> > 2>  The sound quality just plain sucks.  I've got a pentium pro 166,

> I didn't know they made PPro 166's. Huh...

> Has the sound changed from the demo? I bought the game (xmas gift) based
> on the demo looks & sound. The demo ran sounded & looked great. I do not
> expect that the game is worse than the demo.

> > 32MB ram,  a sounblaster awe32-pnp, and TWO sets of Altec Lansing
> > ACS500 speaker systems - when I play the original NASCAR the room
> > literally shakes.  When I play NASCAR2 with the proper and same sound
> > setup all I get is FM quality sound (rather than the engines rumbling
> > they buzz)  Tech support says it's not coming out with anything to
> > correct this and its just the difference between the two games.  Even
> > if I had a rendition card to get the full 3D graphics the sound
> > quality is so poor I just can't justify the $50!

> Huh. I guess I will be dissapointed when I open & run the game on Xmas...

> > Basically they rushed to get this game out before Christmas and
> > neglecting many refinements and failing miserably!!!

il agree on that one the sound is poor and the doors still dont dent
i hope nono i know papy will make a BIG! patch if not papy r  u hearin
me right now cus if u are THE GAME NEEDS BIG TIME WORK!
PLEASE do something about this papy
zig

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by zig » Tue, 17 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>Utter nonsense! Your the first on this group to complain about graphics
>performance with a machine of your caliber. Your system either lacks the
>fastvid utility or some serious tweaking. I have a Pentium Pro 200MHz w/ a
>Matrox Millenium and under no conditions do I get under 24fps. This is with all
>the textures turned on, all 39 cars seen ahead and four heard. After the start,
>it goes to 29-30fps, no matter the track.

I made no mention of the frame rate (where did you get 24fps???), I
have no problem their.  My complaint is that the actual graphics are
not 3 dimensional, their 2 dimensional.  So I have no idea what your
rambling about.  

I realize this and made sure that I was speaking with a supervisor and
made sure I was perfectly clear about the problem.  I also called
again the next day and spoke with another supervisor and got the same
answer.  They acknowledged that without a rendition card you are going
to get 2 dimensional graphics not 3D...FACT

Okay maybe I wasn't completely clear, the sound that NASCAR2 put's out
is more comparable to FM sound rather than digital and I've received
plenty of email agreeing with me on this.  Believe me I've tried every
possible sound configuration including auto detect (which I am setup
on know) all to no avail.  Auto detect picked the same config that it
did in the original version.  I think that you'd have to realize the
sound quality that the Original NASCAR put out.  My full config is
P166 Pro, 32MB, 3g, 8x cd and an $1000 speaker - subwoofer - surround
system.  The original version really does make the house shake, then
when I switch to N2 I get a buzz version of the sound with practically
no bass which gives you the rumble effect of the engine.

Please - I gave sierra the benefit of the doubt time and time again,
I've had the game for a week and didn't post until today.

Luke Phillip

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by Luke Phillip » Wed, 18 Dec 1996 04:00:00

HAHA!! hrm.... P6-166, strange.. i always remembered that the slowst P6
intel brang out is a P6-180, whered you pull the P166 Pro from?

Alex Fernande

NASCAR2...Huge Disappointment!!!(2D NOT 3D & FM sound)

by Alex Fernande » Thu, 19 Dec 1996 04:00:00



> >> 2>  The sound quality just plain sucks.  I've got a pentium pro 166,

> >I didn't know they made PPro 166's. Huh...

> Yes, iNtel made a couple P6 166s. They came with 512k L2 cache!! They
> were faster than the P6 200 with 256 cache!!

Hah!! All the data that I read including from Intel shows that the P6
166MHz
w/ 512kb of cache part was NOT faster than the 200MHz w/ 256kb.
Definitely not
with the programs that are commonly used. As a matter of fact, Even the
newsletter that Intel put out a good while back showed the benchmarks
and
application benchmarks on all their P6 chips showed that the 200MHz part
was
faster than the 166MHz w/ 512kb cache. The 166MHz was faster than the
180MHz
w/256kb cache but only by a slight margin, and only in certain
applications
that relied heavily on caching data. I found that info on their web site
last year. They should still have it there if anybody is interested.

Alex Fernandez
Harris Corp. GASD


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.