rec.autos.simulators

Video card question for GP2

Mike

Video card question for GP2

by Mike » Mon, 10 Mar 1997 04:00:00

I heard that GP2 doesn't support 3D card. Over here (in NZ), all I can
read in the newspaper adverti***ts is 3D card. What I would like to
know is if I get a 2Mb 3D card, and GP2 doesn't support that card, would
it still be alright to run GP2 (it is like running GP2 without video
card). Does this mean that how well GP2 run depends solely on my CPU
power? Isn't there any card (not too expensive!) that can support both 2D
and 3D ? Some of the retailers don't even know what GP2 is!

Does anyone has any sensible idea?

Prowl

Video card question for GP2

by Prowl » Tue, 11 Mar 1997 04:00:00


>I heard that GP2 doesn't support 3D card. Over here (in NZ), all I can
>read in the newspaper adverti***ts is 3D card. What I would like to
>know is if I get a 2Mb 3D card, and GP2 doesn't support that card, would
>it still be alright to run GP2 (it is like running GP2 without video
>card). Does this mean that how well GP2 run depends solely on my CPU
>power? Isn't there any card (not too expensive!) that can support both 2D
>and 3D ? Some of the retailers don't even know what GP2 is!

To run your computer you need a card that suports normal SVGA (what
you call 2D).  There are a FEW cards on the market that are 3D
ONLY....but these are add in cards that plug into your current 2D
card.  GP2 Runs very well in SVGA on a good generic (as in $75) 1-2
meg video card, provided that the card runs well in DOS (GP2 is not
optimised for Win95).

I can run it on my slower machine (P133mgz, 1meg generic video card,
16meg normal 60ns ram) and in SVGA with all details except clouds on,
it runs at a good framerate (16+ FPS) on all but the MONACO track
(Monaco has TONS of buildings and tunnels ect that create TEXTURE
horror for a 1meg card).  Overall, a very WELL OPTIMISED game!!!


 DO NOT SEND JUNK E-MAIL:
"By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets
the definition of a telephone fax machine.  By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is
unlawful to send any unsolicited adverti***t to such equipment.  By
Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is
punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever
is greater, for each violation."


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.