Marc
> Fastest was a 37.619 http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> the bottom of the field. I didn't race with them so I don't know how that
> would go, but in practice I certainly wasn't having the same success I had
> at Daytona.
> I think you're right about the 100% setting not being uniform across all
> tracks. I'll try Talladega later tonight.
> David G FIsher
> > Great stuff David. Do you have any replays of info. about your
> experiences
> > at Michigan and California using the default fast set-up? If the AI is
at
> > 100%, where can you place in practise in a full field? Do you find the
AI
> > harder or easier at one or the other of these two tracks? I find the AI
> can
> > be matched or beaten fairly easily at Tally at 100% with the fast
set-up.
> > You obviously find the same. Wondering what your thoughts are (or what
> > replays will show) at Mich. and Calif.
> > Thanks,
> > Marc
> > > > >Ah, that would also explain why the AI's laps at the Glen are 2
> > > > >seconds faster than the current track record. =)
> > > > Played with the AI a bit, seems like 97% keeps the speeds more in
line
> > > > with real life at Daytona and the Glen (may have to bump up their
qual
> > > > ability a bit at the plate tracks but haven't tested enough yet).
The
> > > > AI is still fiendish at 97%, and I'm realizing now that one of the
big
> > > > improvements, at least at Daytona, is that they'll fight and block
to
> > > > keep the low line.
> > > > Jason
> > > I noticed you said in another post that you are finding it hard to
keep
> > the
> > > low line at
> > > Daytona due to the high corner speeds. I said in another thread that
if
> > > people are finding this a problem it must be controller related. I
> posted
> > a
> > > replay here http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > against
> > > the AI at 101% at 70 degrees where I drove the low, high, and middle
> line
> > a
> > > bit after moving up to first with the fast setup with no problem.
That's
> > why
> > > I thought it had to be
> > > controller related if drivers I knew were excellent were finding the
> fast
> > > setup to push so bad. Pete S. from here at ras couldn't duplicate what
> he
> > > saw in the replay
> > > but
> > > then on Sat. in the chat room before the (almost) RASCAR race he said
he
> > > switched out the pots in his wheel and found that 100k pots worked the
> > best
> > > and he didn't find the fast setup to push anymore. 50k and 250k didn't
> > feel
> > > good to him.
> > > What type of pots do you have in your wheel?
> > > I posted a second replay today with some laps from a race against the
AI
> > at
> > > 105% with the fast setup at 60 degrees where I move
> > > from 43rd to 35th over 4 laps, and then move to the high line and
middle
> > > line for a few laps to show how the fast setup is still stable at
those
> > > speeds on any line. The replay is called DaytFast105. The fast setup
is
> > > still good
> > > against the AI at that level and as you can see there is no push at
all
> > even
> > > though I'm entering the turns at 200mph in a pack, 199 on the outside
> > line,
> > > and exiting T4 at 198. No problem at all
> > > holding the low line even at the increased corner speeds.
> > > I really think that people who are good drivers and are still having
> > trouble
> > > with the fast setup seeming to push are doing so because of the type
of
> > pots
> > > they have in their wheel. Maybe Pete will read this and add his
> thoughts.
> > > David G Fisher