> IN REFRENCE TO THE MAN WHO SAYS THAT 15 OVALS AREN'T
> CHALLENGING, TRY USIN G THE SAME SETUP AT NORTH WILKESBORO,
> BRISTOL, AND TALLEDEGA. AND AS WELL, I HOPE THEY WOULD INCLUDE
> WATKINS GLEN AND SEARS POINT. THAT'S ALL FOR NOW FROM HONEY POT,PA
> AND UNIV PARK .
> DA BEAR
Hmmm. Was that me? Let's see now, what did I write?
"15 different ovals and poor handling vehicles isn't my idea of a
fun game."
Which of course denotes that driving NASCAR is a walk in the
park. Since English doesn't appear to be your native language, let me
state that differently: ...driving NASCAR is a piece of cake (ps this
is sarcasm, I can see the confusion on your brow as I type). Seeing how
this statement and your reply are completely at odds with each other,
what the hell are you responding to?
As the game is being made by Papyrus, why would I want to do
that? I thought the reason you could change the car setups was so you
were better able to drive at the different locales. Isn't that like
saying, "IN REFRENCE TO THE MAN WHO SAYS THAT BREATHING G SN'T
CHALLENGING, T RY DOING IT WITH A SOCK IN YOUR MOUTH!"
"Why?"
"BBECAUSE IT'S CHALLANGING!"
a caps-lock key, a spell checker, a few grammar lessons, and a monitor
so I can see what the *** I'm typing...
Try this: Pretend you're a little***roach hopping from key to key.
First hop on over to the Caps Lock button. Then take each letter as
they come. No cheating with the other hand hitting shift! Or perhaps
you've thought it over, and decided that all caps is the proper way to
communicate by modem, and just don't understand why so many people use
them small letters to talk to each other. Or maybe there's a group for
people like you, alt.caps.ON, who have some militant alt.fan.lemurs
members teaching you how to subtly infiltrate the internet.
About this time Stone, Christopher decided he would contribute this gem
to the discussion:
Prejudices are such funny things. Here in the western United
States, NASCAR is perceived to be quite the "Bubba-fest", as you put it.
Yeah, well one sided discussions aren't much fun, I thought I'd
put out my opinion on the subject, different as it may be. Of course I
realized that the net is full of people who take everything personally
and believe that Their Way is The Way, but this group displayed
remarkably little of this sort of behavior, especially with F1GP vs.
IndyCar being such an easy topic to propagate such behavior. I stand
corrected.
Would I buy a Mickey Thompson OR Racing simulator with IndyCar's
level of realism? In a heartbeat. In addition, I feel that the dynamic
nature of the seat of your pants racing style, along with the shorter
races, would appeal to a much larger market than a NASCAR simulator
would.
You are right, I wouldn't buy a NASCAR simulator, as I already
own IndyCar and the products would be far to similar to justify fifty
more dollars for more of the same. And there are enough people without
"brand name loyalty" to NASCAR that feel the same, and they aren't going
to be buying NASCAR either. I stand behind my original point: I would
rather see Papyrus spend their considerable time and talent producing a
GP Cycle racing or MTORR simulator.
( Ps, I understand that a few of you really like NASCAR racing, and all
I can say is I'm glad that IndyCar came out first, because if NACR
a u n prswscndrn aiga nyrsmltr wudei'bgetspotr:
