rec.autos.simulators

RASF1 Malaysia

Haqsa

RASF1 Malaysia

by Haqsa » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:18:03

Wow.  That's just weird.


Ian

RASF1 Malaysia

by Ian » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:52:24





>>>   Are you asking why you host races with invulnerability
>>> turned off?  I keep asking myself that too.

>> Running with damage tends to cut down on the 'playstation'
>> mentality.  It makes people drive a little better, knowing that if
>> they***up, they're out.  With this touchy netcode I may have to
>> re-think that, though...

>> Eldred

> Hi Eldred:

>    As a semi regular poster, I've read about RAS
> group races for a long time.  Communities of
> serious sim racers who have grown familiar with
> each other over the years as they've honed their
> skills for each car and track.

>    Is the playstation mentality a problem?

>    With damage off, if you make a mistake you are
> punished by loosing position and time.  Being stuck
> in the gravel consumes a lot of time.  And you may
> not be responsible for the collision.

>    The obvious benefit to you is that your practice
> and qualifying does reward you with the expected
> amount of track time.  I would have been benefited
> from damage off, I didn't hit anything, I would
> have had you to race against.

>    This is RAS, serious sim racers.  I understand
> what that means, sigh me up for serious races.
> damage on or off.  I'm only offering a thought as
> to getting more enjoyment out of the experience.
> And fewer hurt feelings.

>    Stability assistance bothers me.

>    I've never seen a post to RAS by a real F1
> driver, so we're all guessing, but the consensus at
> RAS is that real F1 cars are allowed ABS and
> traction control.  I'm using Low TC.

No ABS in real F1

- Show quoted text -

Yes, I've admitted it was my fault and apologised. I genuinely thought tere
was enough room though, which there had have been if not for warp.

NP, as I said, it was my mistake :)

Me too, it was a good race from my perspective (except for the incident with
Eldred, which I didn't know about until after the race.)

--

Ian P
<email invalid due to spammers>

Ian

RASF1 Malaysia

by Ian » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:54:50


> I guess I'm just not used to the way race sims do their networking.
> I have played a lot of shooters and they are all client/server,
> meaning the server is in charge of resolving all movement, physics,
> collisions, etc. and the client only displays the data, it does not
> figure anything out by itself. That is the most secure model and the
> only way I know of to prevent these kinds of errors.  Apparently
> racing sims don't do this.  For a two car collision, if it was
> resolved on the server both clients would experience it, regardless
> of whether or not it looked like they touched on the client side.
> Apparently that's not how F1C or GPL works.

I think the majority of sim developers could learn a thing or two from the
people who made LFS. The netplay in that is about the best I've come across,
you can literally run door to door.

--

Ian P
<email invalid due to spammers>

Neil Charlto

RASF1 Malaysia

by Neil Charlto » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:50:09


[snip]
[snip]

Yeah - sorry bout that. I was in tune with the agreement but the sheer
degree to which everyone slowed caught me out. I thought it best to move
into the gap rather than get punted.

I slowed round T2 to let you back past. I think it was you but there were
14,297 McLarens on track ;)

I managed the astounding feat of a simple spin and then failing to grab the
clutch in time. What a *****.

I'm feeling like Eldred at the moment - can't seem to get a flow going.
There's always next week :)

cya

Dave Henri

RASF1 Malaysia

by Dave Henri » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:23:04

"Neil Charlton"

   There is a starter button you can enable.  I haven't used it with F1 but
in the Le Mans mod it's 'fun' to shut down your engine during a pitstop.  
Then restart and go...

dave henrie

Phaso

RASF1 Malaysia

by Phaso » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:28:21

As it was intended! When the situation arises, I think RAS'ers are very good
at keeing their lapped car out of the way.  I find it very difficult thing
to do well.

I don't remember my SA vs. non-SA times, but it most definately makes a huge
difference - perhaps the most of any of the aids.  I am completely in favor
of turning off stability control, and any other aids the group wants to ban.

There was definately something quirky with the connection - my crew chief
audio messages were several laps behind what was actually happening, right
from the start.  Perhaps it had something to do with all of us connecting
the server at exactly the same time?  That was my only issue though - I
didn't see a single warp or lag onscreen, and all the timing screens appear
to have been correct.  I didn't get the disco icon until halfway through my
victory lap (23), I just thought Eldred had pulled the plug.

-Phasor

Eldre

RASF1 Malaysia

by Eldre » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:38:37


writes:

When I went into the office this morning, the server was sitting at the login
screen.  In other words, it re-booted.  Not sure why, either.  I can't blame
another league, because that isn't the server that got used for other races.
Argh...

Eldred
--
.sig file is at the cleaners...

Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
GPLRank -2.4
N2k3 rank ?

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

RASF1 Malaysia

by Eldre » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:38:37


writes:

Same thing happens in GPL and N2K3 all the time.  One car doesn't see(or feel)
any contact, but the other car does gymnastics because of it...

Eldred
--
.sig file is at the cleaners...

Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank -2.4
N2k3 rank ?

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

RASF1 Malaysia

by Eldre » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:38:37


writes:

Nah, I can believe that it was warp.  This netcode isn't all that we'd like.  I
see cars making moves that LOOK impossible, but they do it.
The time you thought you'd seen my wing fall off for no apparent reason, you
just missed me bouncing off a wall seconds earlier...

Eldred
--
.sig file is at the cleaners...

Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank -2.4
N2k3 rank ?

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

RASF1 Malaysia

by Eldre » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:38:36



>   As a semi regular poster, I've read about RAS
>group races for a long time.  Communities of
>serious sim racers who have grown familiar with
>each other over the years as they've honed their
>skills for each car and track.  

>   Is the playstation mentality a problem?  

At times, yes.  

That's the same point I tried to make in allowing 'no yellow flag' racing.  The
argument against that was that if you spin and crash, you have no chance to win
the race anymore.  Hmm, I thought that happened in real racing as well...<g>

When I drove without stability, I couldn't even complete ONE lap without
spinning.  Seriously.  Our GPL league ran a few races at Magny-Cours.  Me,
being the realism junkie that I am, took to the track without any of the
driving aids.  Couldn't do it.  Even after turning on TC at the suggestion of
another league member, I was still 20 seconds or so off the pace.  Turning on
stability let me gain about 5 or 6 seconds, but not nearly enough to keep up.
It helps, but it isn't going to make a slow driver(me) competitive with fast
drivers(everyone else).

I think that if we banned stability, most people would be spinning off every
other turn.  That's not fun at ALL.  I might be convinced to allow
invulnerability, but I have my doubts about banning stability.

Eldred
--
.sig file is at the cleaners...

Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank -2.4
N2k3 rank ?

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Ruud Dingeman

RASF1 Malaysia

by Ruud Dingeman » Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:43:26


> It helps, but it isn't going to make a slow driver(me) competitive with fast
> drivers(everyone else).

Euh, if it's any consolation Eldred, I think your GPL Kyalami time of
1:20.5 is pretty goshdarn red hot   :)   Only recently managed 1:20.6
myself.

Regards, Rudy
(GPLRank -10)

Neil Charlto

RASF1 Malaysia

by Neil Charlto » Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:48:48

Cheers Dave - I never knew that. I'll go looking for it.

Regards


Haqsa

RASF1 Malaysia

by Haqsa » Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:25:18

That's what I don't get.  Clearly Eldred is not slow or incompetent, his GPL
rank is proof that he is fast and competent.  His rank is certainly much
better than mine.  So I am really starting to wonder, Eldred (if you're
still listening :) if you aren't just having some fundamental problem with
frame rate, or controller setup, or car setup in F1C.  It doesn't make sense
to me that an experienced racer like yourself would be having so much
trouble IF everything was set up properly.  What kind of frame rates are you
getting?  Have you followed the controller setups that I have posted here?
If you look in the controller screen in game and move your controls, does
the onscreen display move linearly?  Are you using the setups that come with
the game or someone else's?  Something has got to be amiss here.


Larry Lindstro

RASF1 Malaysia

by Larry Lindstro » Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:33:10


> That's what I don't get.  Clearly Eldred is not slow or incompetent, his GPL
> rank is proof that he is fast and competent.  His rank is certainly much
> better than mine.  So I am really starting to wonder, Eldred (if you're
> still listening :) if you aren't just having some fundamental problem with
> frame rate, or controller setup, or car setup in F1C.  It doesn't make sense
> to me that an experienced racer like yourself would be having so much
> trouble IF everything was set up properly.  What kind of frame rates are you
> getting?  Have you followed the controller setups that I have posted here?
> If you look in the controller screen in game and move your controls, does
> the onscreen display move linearly?  Are you using the setups that come with
> the game or someone else's?  Something has got to be amiss here.

Hi Haqsau:

   If you have any setups, or tips, I'd like to
see them.  

                                          Larry

Haqsa

RASF1 Malaysia

by Haqsa » Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:14:23

See the thread "why is it than in F1C...." posted by Kasper Kowalski today.
The camber and toe angles are IMO the second most critical thing in F1C, the
first being wing setting.  Other than that there are a lot of things that
are more a matter of taste and driving style, and a function of which aids
you are using.  A setup designed for full TC will be too loose with less TC,
and a setup designed for no TC will be impossibly tight with full TC.  Trail
brakers need different brake bias and damper settings than straight line
brakers.  Etc.  I'm comfortable with my setups but have no idea whether
anyone else would consider them drivable.  Tell you what, since this is a
text only forum and F1C setup files are text format files, I will post in a
reply to this note one of my setups.  You can cut it and paste it and try it
for yourself.  I would appreciate some feedback on it.



rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.