Have a read of this 'preview' of N2003 and look at the comments made by the
general public.
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Let him have it. What a disgrace.
massivechicken
Have a read of this 'preview' of N2003 and look at the comments made by the
general public.
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Let him have it. What a disgrace.
massivechicken
http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=8426&mode=thread&order=0&...
He's got both barrels coming his way. It's the most inept piece of reviewing
i've ever seen in my life.
__
Si.
http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=8426&mode=thread&order=0&...
As many have already said whoever wrote that must be a complete and utter
MORON!!!
I wonder if he needs help breathing.
--
callsignviper
The truth is out there. You just have look in the right places and ask the
right questions.
Geez, where do they get this guy? I'll bet he drives some really crappy car
and hates Manual gears!!
GB
http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=8426&mode=thread&order=0&...
Mike
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
OTOH, his preview is about in line with every other review/preview
I've ever read on that site.
Jason
Mike
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> >Whatever man, not everyone is gonna think the same thing about every
game.
> >Even if his review is a little ignorant to you, it's a perfectly
legitimate
> >review for others with the same mind-set towards ***.
> I dunno, I expect people who preview games to at least read the
> included documentation before wasting multiple paragraphs ***ing
> about missing features that aren't really missing. Personally I could
> care less if he likes/dislikes it, I just find the repeated factual
> errors to be pathetic.
> OTOH, his preview is about in line with every other review/preview
> I've ever read on that site.
> Jason
Marc
> Mike
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > Guys,
> > Have a read of this 'preview' of N2003 and look at the comments made by
> the
> > general public.
> Mike
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > Guys,
> > Have a read of this 'preview' of N2003 and look at the comments made by
> the
> > general public.
I think we just need to accept that he was writing for a clientele whose
requirements are very far away from ours (however mixed ours may be). But it
would be good if such reviewers would define and describe their target group
more clearly. The heat he's taking over on that worthplaying site is
justified, as apparently, they put up a review that was absolutely not
suited to _their_ clientele.
Achim
He says that you need a wheel to play this sim correctly, to have a chance at
having a good time. You know what? He's right. When was the last time you
recommended a sim to someone without adding..."Do you have a wheel? You really
need to get a wheel to enjoy this sim...really cheap too!"
And in the end of the review he flat out states that if you want a racing game
this in not for you, move on...but if you wanta "GAME THAT TAKES THE SIMULATION
ASPECT AS FAR AS IT CAN GO"...then this is the one.
Not so bad, I think.
Okay...let the flaming begin (ducking)
--
Slot
Tweaks & Reviews
www.slottweak.com
> Geez, where do they get this guy? I'll bet he drives some really crappy
car
> and hates Manual gears!!
> GB
> > Guys,
> > Have a read of this 'preview' of N2003 and look at the comments made by
> the
> > general public.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
The really worrying thing is you saddo's getting all het up about some
obscure online review of a game that will sell to the fans regardless of
what the "journalist" types.
His closing paragraph includes this quote.." All in all, Nascar 2003 Racing
Season delivers heavily to *** simulation fans while leaving everyone
else confused and frustrated. "
What's wrong with that ?
No, he doesn't say "This game needs a wheel to get the most out of it". He
says "This game is ***because it requires a wheel to control."
BIG difference, IMO.
It's a cop out... the review should have started with that sentence and gone
on to what makes NR2003 a great simulation or not. He starts of with a
premise which doesn't apply to NR2003 and then goes on to lambast NR2003 for
not living up to it. That's not reviewing, that's badmouthing.
Tell me when you're medium rare. <g>
Jan.
=---
..."leaving them no alternative but to wreck tirelessly on every open server
they can find so that no one else can enjoy it"...