rec.autos.simulators

by **Petri Lindber** » Fri, 15 Feb 2002 19:31:21

What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent
driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...?

pete

by **Trappe** » Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:40:30

I don't think so. I think it looks better, the AI is better and it gives me
better Fps on my machine.
Quite a bit of improvements all the way around compared to N4. Just my .02.

by **Biz** » Fri, 15 Feb 2002 22:13:50

Might help if you list some of your hardware for possible clues to whats wrong.

--
Biz

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash

> What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent
> driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...?

> pete

by **Pete** » Fri, 15 Feb 2002 22:49:30

ok,i have: AMD 1600+ TB,512 mb,Gainward GF3 with just now driver 27.20 (but
also test 21.83 and 32.11) Abit KT7A RAID,2 x 7200 46gb IBM deskstar,SB
Audigy,Momo...and some thing else shit ;)

pete

> Might help if you list some of your hardware for possible clues to whats
wrong.

> --
> Biz

> "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
> alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
> the....." - Ash

by **Pete** » Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:05:05

and 32.11

...sure i mean 23.11...;)

pete

by **SimRace** » Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:53:19

Ok, got the specs, you left out the most important really. What OS are you
running? I have a similar system to yours (same mobo, RAM and sound card)
but have a lowly AMD 1.2 Ghz CPU and a Visiontek GF3.

I use Win XP Pro, 23.11 vid drivers and get decent results in OpenGL at
1024X768 with FSAA 2x enabled. All looks great and I get over 50 FPS most
places (online, in populated races, not alone in testing, those are 70+ FPS)

> ok,i have: AMD 1600+ TB,512 mb,Gainward GF3 with just now driver 27.20
(but
> also test 21.83 and 32.11) Abit KT7A RAID,2 x 7200 46gb IBM deskstar,SB
> Audigy,Momo...and some thing else shit ;)

> pete

> > Might help if you list some of your hardware for possible clues to whats
> wrong.

> > --
> > Biz

> > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
> > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular
structures,....and
> > the....." - Ash

> > > What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent
> > > driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar
2002...?

> > > pete

by **Lonnie Pac** » Sat, 16 Feb 2002 04:31:22

I have the same opinion. I'm running the demo and the full game on the same
machine. AMD 1.2 Thunderbird, WinXP, GeForce2MX 400 32meg, 512meg ram, 21.83
driver (also tried 23.11), same graphics detail settings in D3D. The demo
looks much better. The full game looks fuzzy. Tried OpenGL with same
result, but better framerate. I tried the same testing on 2 other similar
machines (one running Win98) with same result.
I like the game, but I can't get rid of the fuzziness.

by **Trappe** » Sat, 16 Feb 2002 05:38:51

Hmm.Thats interesting the full game and Demo look the same to me.

"> driver (also tried 23.11), same graphics detail settings in D3D. The
demo

> looks much better. The full game looks fuzzy. > "Petri Lindberg"

rec.autos.simulators

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...