rec.autos.simulators

NR2003 Loose web setups

Pete

NR2003 Loose web setups

by Pete » Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:33:34

    Bill, was talking with JD tonight. He asked if you had been deported
yet.
Something about being a "foreigner". :-)
    Frank, Julian wanted to know if you ever got a job. I told him yes,
you were working for Papyrus doing there public relations work. :-)

    Pete


ymenar

NR2003 Loose web setups

by ymenar » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:49:12


>    Frank, Julian wanted to know if you ever got a job. I told him yes,
> you were working for Papyrus doing there public relations work. :-)

Tehehe.

I'm in the field of architecture now.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

ymenar

NR2003 Loose web setups

by ymenar » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:51:38


>> So tell me, which Papyrus released software, if you take it individually,
>> was bad at it's time of it's release?  Sorry but they were *all* good.
>> Icr,
>> N1, Icr2, N2, N3, Nr99, Gpl, Soda, Nr2002, Nr2003, etc..  The only one,
>> borderline, was Nascar Racing 4.  And even that was a good release with
>> the
>> standard quality tracks, multi, replay, gui, sound, etc...  if you
>> compared
>> it to any EA game.

>> And tell me, which EA released Nascar game, if you take it individually,
>> was
>> bad at it's time of it's release? Almost all of them.  Like I wrote, they
>> produced more then bad sims, they were even BAD arcade games. "Nascar
>> Road
>> Racing", again, ouch. "Nascar Rumble", "Nascar 99", "Nascar 2000",
>> "Nascar
>> 2001", "Nascar Thunder 2002".  Yikes "Nascar Revolution".

>  I'd say the only one good at its release, as you ask, was gpl.

Ok that's enough.  Not only were you the first to trigger the "tough words"
and immature flaming, that response is just totally wrong and you know it.
To say that no Papyrus game, even back then, was good and that you had no
fun, is plain 100% wrong.  You just dislike simracing.  This is over for me.

P.s.:  Dale Jr. said that Nascar Heat was the worst one he tried.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

JP

NR2003 Loose web setups

by JP » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:44:29



> >> So tell me, which Papyrus released software, if you take it
individually,
> >> was bad at it's time of it's release?  Sorry but they were *all* good.
> >> Icr,
> >> N1, Icr2, N2, N3, Nr99, Gpl, Soda, Nr2002, Nr2003, etc..  The only one,
> >> borderline, was Nascar Racing 4.  And even that was a good release with
> >> the
> >> standard quality tracks, multi, replay, gui, sound, etc...  if you
> >> compared
> >> it to any EA game.

> >> And tell me, which EA released Nascar game, if you take it
individually,
> >> was
> >> bad at it's time of it's release? Almost all of them.  Like I wrote,
they
> >> produced more then bad sims, they were even BAD arcade games. "Nascar
> >> Road
> >> Racing", again, ouch. "Nascar Rumble", "Nascar 99", "Nascar 2000",
> >> "Nascar
> >> 2001", "Nascar Thunder 2002".  Yikes "Nascar Revolution".

> >  I'd say the only one good at its release, as you ask, was gpl.

> Ok that's enough.  Not only were you the first to trigger the "tough
words"
> and immature flaming, that response is just totally wrong and you know it.
> To say that no Papyrus game, even back then, was good and that you had no
> fun, is plain 100% wrong.  You just dislike simracing.  This is over for

me.

 <laughter>

  Show me where I said I had no fun.  I did.  Still do.  But to say they
were quality sims (before N4) of stock car racing, as you said, is wrong.
They weren't.  They were quality racing sim.  Just not of stock cars.

   Oh well.  Seeing as you manage to ignore all his complaints about 03,
guess you can pick whichever comment you want.

Pete

NR2003 Loose web setups

by Pete » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:43:59

    Yes, I did tell him that. He wished you well.

    Pete


Bill Bollinge

NR2003 Loose web setups

by Bill Bollinge » Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:14:46

It is a F-ing Foreigner LOL

Bill Bollinger
www.gsxn.com


>    Bill, was talking with JD tonight. He asked if you had been deported
> yet.
> Something about being a "foreigner". :-)
>    Frank, Julian wanted to know if you ever got a job. I told him yes,
> you were working for Papyrus doing there public relations work. :-)

>    Pete



>> >    By the way I'll say hi to Julian for you. LOL He'll love the "god"
>> > comment.

>> Give him a good FU from Amish :)

>> Bill Bollinger
>> www.gsxn.com

HH

NR2003 Loose web setups

by HH » Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:35:38

I disagree.  SODA seemed like an unfinished product.



>>> So tell me, which Papyrus released software, if you take it
>>> individually,
>>> was bad at it's time of it's release?  Sorry but they were *all* good.
>>> Icr,
>>> N1, Icr2, N2, N3, Nr99, Gpl, Soda, Nr2002, Nr2003, etc..  The only one,
>>> borderline, was Nascar Racing 4.  And even that was a good release with
>>> the
>>> standard quality tracks, multi, replay, gui, sound, etc...  if you
>>> compared
>>> it to any EA game.

>>> And tell me, which EA released Nascar game, if you take it individually,
>>> was
>>> bad at it's time of it's release? Almost all of them.  Like I wrote,
>>> they
>>> produced more then bad sims, they were even BAD arcade games. "Nascar
>>> Road
>>> Racing", again, ouch. "Nascar Rumble", "Nascar 99", "Nascar 2000",
>>> "Nascar
>>> 2001", "Nascar Thunder 2002".  Yikes "Nascar Revolution".

>>  I'd say the only one good at its release, as you ask, was gpl.

> Ok that's enough.  Not only were you the first to trigger the "tough
> words" and immature flaming, that response is just totally wrong and you
> know it. To say that no Papyrus game, even back then, was good and that
> you had no fun, is plain 100% wrong.  You just dislike simracing.  This is
> over for me.

> P.s.:  Dale Jr. said that Nascar Heat was the worst one he tried.

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
> Corporation - helping America into the New World...

dsechres

NR2003 Loose web setups

by dsechres » Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:08:53

LOL...I guess that is why Dale Jr. had Nascar Heat as his favorite racing
game way back when he was a part of Blackhole Motorsports then,right?

Heck....there aren't ANY racing games I like better than Heat..and that
includes NR2003,NR2002,any Thunder game or even so far back as Nascar 2.With
all the mods and tracks Nascar Heat has,and the longevity it's
sustained,I'll just keep right on playing it.Dale Jr or no Dale Jr...LOL.

> I disagree.  SODA seemed like an unfinished product.




> >>> So tell me, which Papyrus released software, if you take it
> >>> individually,
> >>> was bad at it's time of it's release?  Sorry but they were *all* good.
> >>> Icr,
> >>> N1, Icr2, N2, N3, Nr99, Gpl, Soda, Nr2002, Nr2003, etc..  The only
one,
> >>> borderline, was Nascar Racing 4.  And even that was a good release
with
> >>> the
> >>> standard quality tracks, multi, replay, gui, sound, etc...  if you
> >>> compared
> >>> it to any EA game.

> >>> And tell me, which EA released Nascar game, if you take it
individually,
> >>> was
> >>> bad at it's time of it's release? Almost all of them.  Like I wrote,
> >>> they
> >>> produced more then bad sims, they were even BAD arcade games. "Nascar
> >>> Road
> >>> Racing", again, ouch. "Nascar Rumble", "Nascar 99", "Nascar 2000",
> >>> "Nascar
> >>> 2001", "Nascar Thunder 2002".  Yikes "Nascar Revolution".

> >>  I'd say the only one good at its release, as you ask, was gpl.

> > Ok that's enough.  Not only were you the first to trigger the "tough
> > words" and immature flaming, that response is just totally wrong and you
> > know it. To say that no Papyrus game, even back then, was good and that
> > you had no fun, is plain 100% wrong.  You just dislike simracing.  This
is
> > over for me.

> > P.s.:  Dale Jr. said that Nascar Heat was the worst one he tried.

> > --
> > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
> > Corporation - helping America into the New World...


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.