I un-installed GPL 3 months ago!
You were saying... ??
--
ed_
You were saying... ??
--
ed_
So then what the hell do you care what some die-hard GPL'ers had to say
about an alpha version of Rally Trophy?
David G Fisher
Prehaps you should try once again.... this time look a bit further than the
words... ??
--
ed_
Btw, where on earth did you get this *die-hard* GPL'ers idea from..??
I just forwarded what and an old friend that I raced GPL with said about
what he had seen...
--
ed_
> So then what the hell do you care what some die-hard GPL'ers had to say
> about an alpha version of Rally Trophy?
> David G Fisher
> > Know what Dave.....
> > I un-installed GPL 3 months ago!
> > You were saying... ??
> > --
> > ed_
The problem is, you made the old, boring and ridiculous assumption that
anyone should care about comments from GPL zealots similiar to the one's in
your original post
David G Fisher
> Prehaps you should try once again.... this time look a bit further than
the
> words... ??
> > BTW, it's Rally Trophy, not Rally Thropy.
> That's a typo stupid.... Ignpore it. Ignpore it. Ignpore it. !!
> --
> ed_
| I knew it!! You still dont get it!
|
| Prehaps you should try once again.... this time look a bit further than
the
| words... ??
|
|
| > BTW, it's Rally Trophy, not Rally Thropy.
|
| That's a typo stupid.... Ignpore it. Ignpore it. Ignpore it. !!
|
|
| --
| ed_
|
|
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.265 / Virus Database: 137 - Release Date: 7/18/2001
"And whatever you do, DO NOT give any GPL'ers beta testing opportunitie of
Rally Trophy. That would be a huge mistake."
Somehow, it can be misleading. Sorry for that.
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Todd Walker
twalker at jam dot rr dot com
http://twalker.d2g.com/gpl
As I said in my post, I have big respect for the guy and his opinions,
but other people I also respect has said the countrary, so I guess
we're back to basic. RT sure sounds like a promising sim, and I have
already praised the idea of including a Volvo Amazon. Roll on demo.
Finally: Who gave you the right to do stupid insulting generalizations
like that DGF ? I just don't get it.
--
Olav K. Malmin
remove .spam when replying
<snip> ^^^^^^
This from a man who complains about "Thropy"...
Ahem! (sorry, couldn't resist it.)
--
David. (GPLRank handicap -6.57; Monsters of GPL +271.79)
The GPL Scrapyard: *will be down for a while - hackers at 9ug :-( *
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really" - Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh.
Then there is the matter of these "GPL racers" you
quote. Has there ever been any piece of code,
with the possible exception of N4, that has earned
anything but contempt from the more rabid fans of
GPL? Or, more mildly, a dismissive "It's no GPL."
GPL racers-- though I have nothing against them-- are the most prejudiced
when evaluating whether a racing title is a simulation or not. So I
wouldn't pay much attention to what they say.
BTW, who is this anonymous person who you and Ed respect so much. Is there a
reason why his name hasn't yet been connected to his comments?
David Fisher
> > Ask him for some backing - why did he feel the physics were a total
> > disappointment and why it was a "piece of real junk" in general? And
where
> > did he see the preview version - was it the real press preview version?
To
> > me that ranting sounded like a troll, nothing more.
> Sorry, haven't been able to get any backing yet. As Ed said, maybe it
> was just a misjudgement or whatever, maybe the guy was ironic, I don't
> know.
> As I said in my post, I have big respect for the guy and his opinions,
> but other people I also respect has said the countrary, so I guess
> we're back to basic. RT sure sounds like a promising sim, and I have
> already praised the idea of including a Volvo Amazon. Roll on demo.
> Finally: Who gave you the right to do stupid insulting generalizations
> like that DGF ? I just don't get it.
> --
> Olav K. Malmin
> remove .spam when replying
Why the hell didn't you find the FSAA bug!! It's really annoying ;)
Seriously though anybody know why the source is under lock and key, is it
for sale?
just be careful with the words you use. You're a GPL racer as well,
right?
Those who got GPL and realized it is something special, were also able
to do the same for many a newer simulation that has come out since then.
The problem is with the other, 'me too' GPL racers, who read the posts
of the people mentioned before, and made a religion out of them. I don't
want to go into sociology or whatever here, but I think you share
similar views.
Therefore, it's perfectly OK to give a GPL racer a testing opportunity,
as long as that tester is also a GP3, RC2000 or whatever racer and can
enjoy those racing games for what they are meant to deliver, not how
they compare to GPL.
-Gregor
> GPL racers-- though I have nothing against them-- are the most prejudiced
> when evaluating whether a racing title is a simulation or not. So I
> wouldn't pay much attention to what they say.
If only GPL'ers had beta tested RC2000...
Luckily there were a number of real life rally drivers who I beta tested
RC2000 with who actually knew what they were talking about.
David G Fisher
> > And whatever you do, DO NOT give any GPL'ers beta testing opportunities
of
> > Rally Trophy. That would be a huge mistake.
> > David G Fisher
> If only GPL'ers had beta tested RC2000...