Thoughts from ECCI:
ECCI has had a functioning test bed force-feedback wheel since mid-1997.
And yes, it is of the same quality level as our main product line.
The Bottom Line =
The force feedback effect adds "arcade quality shake rattle and roll"
but adds nothing to help a driver go faster, at least with the current
generation of software. And yes, latency is a big problem, even with a
very fast computer and the current serial port FF connection... which
will not improve that much under USB. In fact, the better and more
dynamic the FF effect, the greater the latency. Is there any surprise in
this? In my opinion it is another refrain in the old processor occupancy
debate of software development. I believe PAPYRUS has it right... (and I
think the recent posts on the lack of FF in GPL have it all wrong):
#1 - First emphasis on car physics modeling as in GPL / N3...
#2 - Graphics is second because it is what you see...
#3 - and soft pedal it on the hand-candy (FF).
Firstly, MUCH too expensive to do with the ECCI standard level of
quality. ($2500+...ouch!)
Second, the actual performance results in our experience, make the
concept pointless when viewed in light of our guiding philosophy of
racing performance. We have made it our guiding principle to offer only
the major features that enhance actual measured racing perfomance...
therefore no FF, as for the forseeable future.
Third, FF belongs on the chassis, not on the wheel to be realistic.
Wheel-only FF will ALWAYS be artificial hand-candy. Go the the NASCAR
Silicon Motor Speedway at the Mall of America to find out what full
chassis/seat/wheel FF can feel like. The full 3-D FF there requires
nearly a hundred networked fast PCs to handle the twelve racing
stations.
P.S. Finally, if you haven't guessed already, NO, the CDS4000 will not
be a FF unit.
Andy Cers
President, ECCI
or