> reply reconfirms 3 things:
> 1. Slicks squeal less.
> 2. It's easier to set up a car for an oval than a road course.
> 3. You're an old guy like me :-)
> --
> Slot
> Tweaks & Reviews
> www.slottweak.com
> > Maxx,
> > I was at Indy in '67 when Parnelli Jones ran the STP turbine car
("Silent
> > Sam") and was sitting down by the creek in Turn 1 during qualifying.
When
> > the turbine came thru the corner, it was so quiet that you could hear
the
> > tub working - it was creaking like a boat at anchor - and, yes, the car
> was
> > on bias-ply slicks. They didn't squeal, exactly, but you could hear
them
> > grumbling in protest as they scuffed through the turn.
> > --Steve
> > > Hi
> > > Gary,
> > > Just a few quick responses, I'm missing my dinner sat here :(
> > > >He also mentioned tire squeal. I'm not sure that it isn't modelled
> right
> > in
> > > >GPL. I believe they still used bias belted tires back in '67 and it
> > didn't
> > > >take much to get them squealing, especailly in a 4 wheel drift or
> losing
> > it
> > > >in a corner. In fact, even after radial tires were introduced, a lot
of
> > race
> > > >car drivers preferred bias belted because they gave more warning of
> when
> > the
> > > >car was losing traction. The loss was more gradual than radial tires.
> The
> > > >other thing is that Malcolm hasn't raced an F1 car from that period
so,
> > > >while he can draw on racing experience in general, he can't really
say
> > how
> > > >these particular cars handled.
> > > I mentioned tire squeal as not being realistic for slick tires.
> > > Generally any treaded tire will squeal if pushed to sliding. I've
> > > often wondered if the old crossply's did in fact squeal as I've
> > > never heard it on any video (in car and external) of a 67 GP
> > > car.
> > > This could be that they didn't squeal (or not loudly) or that the
> > > drivers of the day didn't push them to the levels where they would
> > > squeal as loudly as we hear in GPL.
> > > >So, I didn't agree with everything he said, but I think Malcolm did
an
> > > >admirable job trying to answer a question that wasn't phrased
properly.
> > He
> > > >did make it clear when he was looking at it from a training point of
> view
> > > >and when he was looking at it from a sim racer's viewpoint.
> > > Thanks for that - of course if I'd expected everyone to agree it
> > > would have been pointles posting it :)
> > > >Perhaps the question should have been 'which sims leave you with the
> best
> > > >overall impression of real life racing?'
> > > The n I would have had to type a LOT more words :) LOL
> > > Cheers
> > > Maxx