rec.autos.simulators

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

William Dahm

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by William Dahm » Sun, 08 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I have a dell P Pro 200 / stealth 3D 2000 4MB.
        I was very disappointed with N2 framrates.  When I put everything on
"Auto" everything dissapeared!  And I'm not just talking about the
texture maps, the entire buildings dissapeared as well!  Even with all
the buildings gone and all the remaning things (cars, track, etc . . .)
with no texture maps it still only runs at about 15 FPS.  This is
unplayable; I only settle for 30 FPS or better.
        Am I doing something wrong?  It dosen't make sense that the game would
run this poorly on a P 200.  
        BTW, in ICR2 I get 30 FPS with only turing off the asphault, grass, and
car textures.  I know because I leave everything else on auto and it
dosen't flicker at all.

Jim Sokolof

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by Jim Sokolof » Mon, 09 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>Are You sure that You have a P (PRO ??) 200.  The only people I know of
>using P-6 chips are running NT.  Maybe dual booting 95 (Which takes a big
>performance hit in NT).  You sure It's not a Pentium 200 (P5) CPU.  

Even if it were a 200 MHz P5, we're still talking about a fast machine.

Have you configured UniVBE? (Use uvconfig in your N2 directory.) That's
good for a very nice jump for most card/MB combinations.

Performance of Papyrus (and most other, to be fair) games should be
better with a P6, though not drastically.


[Speaking for myself, but I tend to be somewhat informed... :-) ]

Phil Bowe

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by Phil Bowe » Mon, 09 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Are You sure that You have a P (PRO ??) 200.  The only people I know of
using P-6 chips are running NT.  Maybe dual booting 95 (Which takes a big
performance hit in NT).  You sure It's not a Pentium 200 (P5) CPU.  

Performance of a lot of Apps is actually SLOWER with a P6 (P-Pro).  As bad
as what You say, ???? I don't think so.  Something has to be wrong.  There
is nothing wrong with the Stealth 2000 3D card and I've seen that video
card run terrific frame rates in 6x86's but my question is, Why would You
buy a 200Mhz CPU and be a cheapo on the Video card.  Shitcan that thing and
step up to a Vram/Wram/Fancy version of Something.  MGA or Mystique,
Stealth 3000 3D,  ATI GM Pro. Might not do a TON for the games but You'll
sure like the rest of the system performance better.  

And

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by And » Mon, 09 Dec 1996 04:00:00



Something is wrong.  I'm getting much better than that on a p166!
About 22 FPS with everything on and grass/asphalt to auto.  (20 cars
ahead) and the asphalt stays on.  (at least for the few tracks I raced
on so far)  Anything higher than 20 cars, and I lose the asphalt drops
off tho. :(

Andy
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~ridger
Kali/Nascar/***
WARNING: MY E-MAIL ADDRESS HAS BEEN ALTERED TO PREVENT UNWANTED JUNK MAIL!
REMOVE ASTERISK FROM THE END OF ADDRESS TO REPLY BY E-MAIL.

Great Googeley Moogel

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by Great Googeley Moogel » Tue, 10 Dec 1996 04:00:00


I have a Pentium Pro 200 and a Diamond Stealth 64, and I get 27-30 fps in
Nascar2. Are you using UniVBE?

John D. Courtn

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by John D. Courtn » Tue, 10 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Does anyone have a P120 with no Rendition card?  I would really
appreciate it if someone told me what type of frame rate they were
getting with this type of system.

Thanks,
John

 -- Winners never quit, quiters never win

J. Villanuev

Nascar 2: frame rate question (without rendition)

by J. Villanuev » Wed, 11 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I've got a P133 w/ Matrox Millennium 2MB vid card. I get about 20-25 fps,
with grass, clouds, horizon,and ashalt set to off.
--
J. Villanueva
The views expressed by me are not the views of my employer




rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.