And these are supposedly humorous insults, are they ?
I'll bet you are quite the wittiest person at the country club.
And these are supposedly humorous insults, are they ?
I'll bet you are quite the wittiest person at the country club.
> > I shall now insult you in a Shakespearean manner:
> > Thou distempered, elf-skinned waterfly.
> > Or...
> > Thou grizzled, heavy-handed pigeon-egg.
> > Again thou are invited to take thou pernicious, lily-livered puttocked
> > pick!
> And these are supposedly humorous insults, are they ?
> I'll bet you are quite the wittiest person at the country club.
Computer generated insults.
Is this the high point of all your PC experience, or the low ?
Be honest now.
> > > And these are supposedly humorous insults, are they ?
> > > I'll bet you are quite the wittiest person at the country club.
> > P off, you hallucinating sack of recycled skid marks.
> Computer generated insults.
> Is this the high point of all your PC experience, or the low ?
> Be honest now.
This gotta be the most boring "arguing" I've ever read.
:(
I think the other thread was a lot better.
>>Thou distempered, elf-skinned waterfly.
>>Or...
>>Thou grizzled, heavy-handed pigeon-egg.
>>Again thou are invited to take thou pernicious, lily-livered puttocked
>>pick!
> This gotta be the most boring "arguing" I've ever read.
> :(
--
Fester
One tequila, two tequila, three tequila, floor.
> They must be British. :-P
> --
> Fester
> One tequila, two tequila, three tequila, floor.
Gerry
.
How exactly have I tried to stop anyone from doing anything apart from
personally putting a small filter on the word RASCAR. ? I was under the
impression that these filters only affected the users news reader. If I
managed to block all *your* RASCAR posts from being read, I'm so sorry !
Next.
> .
> > Trying to stop RASCAR from posting on RAS is a high or low point for
> > you? Be honest now.
> How exactly have I tried to stop anyone from doing anything apart from
> personally putting a small filter on the word RASCAR. ? I was under the
> impression that these filters only affected the users news reader. If I
> managed to block all *your* RASCAR posts from being read, I'm so sorry !
> Next.
This you quite clearly did when you uttered thus in reply to Redmist:
Sorry if you have forgotten what you wrote, but that's your problem. But
anyway, it's clear that you reluctantly set up a filter, while
preferring there to be no RASCAR posts at all!
> "Ditto."
> Sorry if you have forgotten what you wrote, but that's your problem. But
> anyway, it's clear that you reluctantly set up a filter, while
> preferring there to be no RASCAR posts at all!
> > > Thanks for throwing some fuel on the fire. Hoping to see some big
> > > explosions were we? Most of us had finally given up beating our heads
> > > against the wall and implemented a filter and now someone decides to use
> > > R*SC*R in the heading. Nice work.
> > "Ditto."
> > Sorry if you have forgotten what you wrote, but that's your problem. But
> > anyway, it's clear that you reluctantly set up a filter, while
> > preferring there to be no RASCAR posts at all!
> You are hallucinating.
> Where the f*** do I say I don't want any RASCAR posts at all ?
> Are you mixing up your pills again ?
What part of his post were you agreeing with when you dittoed it? Just a
part of it or all of it?
If you are going to agree with someone's post you might like to read
what they have written before doing so!
I replied directly to this post...not any others that he(redmist) may have
made.
"Thanks for throwing some fuel on the fire. Hoping to see some big
explosions were we? Most of us had finally given up beating our heads
against the wall and implemented a filter and now someone decides to use
R*SC*R in the heading. Nice work"
So for the simpletons in the class, that means I dittoed his view that after
putting a filter in place to block any more RASCAR posts appearing in MY
newsreader, someone uses "R*SC*R" to deliberately circumvent those of us
who had filtered the subject.
Next reply to you will be in crayon.
> > You said 'ditto' and agreed with everything redmist said. He said he'd
> > given up beating his head against the wall (trying to argue that RASCAR
> > posts don't belong in RAS, which was his stance on the subject) and had
> > implemented a filter.
> > What part of his post were you agreeing with when you dittoed it? Just a
> > part of it or all of it?
> > If you are going to agree with someone's post you might like to read
> > what they have written before doing so!
> I replied directly to this post...not any others that he(redmist) may have
> made.
> "Thanks for throwing some fuel on the fire. Hoping to see some big
> explosions were we? Most of us had finally given up beating our heads
> against the wall and implemented a filter and now someone decides to use
> R*SC*R in the heading. Nice work"
> So for the simpletons in the class, that means I dittoed his view that after
> putting a filter in place to block any more RASCAR posts appearing in MY
> newsreader, someone uses "R*SC*R" to deliberately circumvent those of us
> who had filtered the subject.
That would have to be in HTML, which is not allowed in this newsgroup!
BTW, I find this trip through your mind as illuminating as a 3 watt
bulb!
<PLONK>
Thank *** for that.