rec.autos.simulators

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

Shawn Wi

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Shawn Wi » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00

       I can't resist putting my 2 cent's in on this subject, although
I'm probably contributing to something that shouldn't be in this
newsgroup to begin with.
       We've got all of these people and groups that decide what
we should see, do, have, etc.  Where does it stop?  Today it's
the tobacco and *** advertising in sports.  Tomorrow it might
be the sports themselves.  I mean, lets face it.  It's already been
tried and accomplished for some sports.  What are you all going
to say when it's deemed by some group that auto racing should
be banned because it causes injury and sometimes death to
drivers and fans alike?  "Well, the fan was killed because he
was attracted to be in a dangerous situation, if the temptation
wouldn't have been there, he/she would still be alive."  Far
fetched?  You better wake up!  These groups talk about the
risks of smoking, and that people are unaware.....PLEASE!
Children are unaware, and as parents we should teach them
of these hazards.  Now, a tobacco or *** company that
camps outside of a concert, high school, or festival of some
kind, and gives away samples to minors, let's prosecute and
do something about it.  
       Today I'm forced by law to conform to all kinds of laws that
affect only my own life or health, like wear a seatbelt when I drive
or ride in a motor vehicle, wear a helmet on a motorcycle, etc, etc.
These are the kinds of laws that in my opinion have no place.
I'm not saying that their reasoning behind them are without merit,
just that it should be my choice.  Now, a law that requires a parent
to strap his/her child in a carseat or seatbelt.  This has some merit.
The child doesn't know these things, and unfortunately there are
parents that ignore these types of things.
       Cigarettes and *** are legal substances.  These companies
should have the same right as any other business to advertise their
product.  We as a society are slowly but surely hacking away at
our rights that built this country.  If a business or company breaks
the laws by using fraudulent or misleading advertising, prosecute
them for it.
       Anyway, sorry for the long post.  I didn't intend to ramble on
about this.  And no, I'm not part of a militant group out dwelling
on government intervention.  I'm just a little tired of some of the
piddly laws imposed on this society for "our own good".

Take care,

Shawn Wise
Midwest Motorsports
ProHCS3,HGNS3,
& HTS2 on Hawaii

ymenar

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by ymenar » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00



> >Racing will survive this very well.  We don't need RJR.

> >The tobacco industry just admitted:

> >1.  That cigarettes are ***ive.
> >2.  That they have caused the public _billions_ of dollars in health care
> >costs.
> >3.  That too many children smoke.

> >Why would we want our beloved sport identified with this product?

> Because it's been paying a pretty fair chunk of change to support our
> beloved sport for over 25 years now.

> Cigarettes are a legal product, that can be sold without a
> prescription to the vast majority of viewers of NASCAR. The government
> shouldn't proscribe the advertising of a legal product merely because
> SOME viewers are not old enough to buy and use it. Should we ban
> automobile ads for the same reason? After all, SOME of the audience
> won't be legally allowed to buy and use the cars being advertised, AND
> cars kill lots of people every year... And the auto-makers have worked
> for years to make cars ***ive... :-)  <-- NB

> ---Jim Sokoloff

Here in Canada, we have the same problem.  But the Stupid canadian
goverment as adopted a law, the C-71, and with this the Tobacco industry
is now permitted to have only 10 % of the total space they had before.
Let's take an exemple the F1 Gp of Montreal (BTW it was great!!).
Player's had many publicity on the track. With the law, next year they
will have the permition to put the same publicity, but with only 10% of
it that they could put the logo.  It's ridiculous.  So all the Tobacco
company have decided to go out of major events.  Montreal is known as
the capital of Festivals with over 500.  They would lost the F1gp, the
Benson and Edges International Jazz festival (biggest in the world), the
duMaurier Tennis tournament (in the G-7 of tennis), and many others
(about 30). They would also lost the Toronto AND the Vancouver CART gp.
Also, Player's had a great developement project, that permits canadian
drivers to get into high racing series. Jacques Villeneuve, Greg Moore,
Patrick Carpentier, Bertrand Godin and many others will be without any
sponsorship next year. All this because the goverment has decided that
Tobacco publicity was making non-smokers to start smoking. Yeah sure !
(not). Tobacco do sponsorship for 1 thing. To Make people that are, per
exemple, smoking Camel's, to go smoke different types, like Winston.
It's not because I look at Rothmans on the Jacques Villeneuve
Williams-Renault car that I go directly to the market to buy Rothmands
cigarettes. I don't smoke.  Most smokers started smoking because of
their friends, to look cool. Not because they saw a Malboro logo on Al
Unser's CART car.  Also, you are all lucky in US because you will not
have a anti-tobacco rude law.  Here in Canada it's simple. No
publicity.  Witch means it is against the Liberty of speaking and
publishing.  Freedom of speech, like freedom of publishing, is a
fondamental thing in our world.  We fight against it, and now the Canada
goverment is installing an anti-tobacco law.  Without any sence.  So the
great F1 Gp of Canada, the Vancouver and Toronto CART race will be lost,
but it will affect also all of the Leisure and sports activity in
Canada.  I only hope that we, quebecers, will one day get seperated...
(Only canadians can catch this last sentence)

With great respect,
Good race at the Brickyard,  (-o-)    

SPEED- Co-director
SPEED- Cars, WC, BGN, Trucks, IROC, utilities and more...
SPEED- http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Lieutenant Nien Numb, Gold squadron NSWL
http://www.racesimcentral.net/;
May the force be with you, always!!

- *Excuse me for my poor English(I'm French speaking) * -

ymenar

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by ymenar » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00



> >Racing will survive this very well.  We don't need RJR.

> >The tobacco industry just admitted:

> >1.  That cigarettes are ***ive.
> >2.  That they have caused the public _billions_ of dollars in health care
> >costs.
> >3.  That too many children smoke.

> >Why would we want our beloved sport identified with this product?

> Because it's been paying a pretty fair chunk of change to support our
> beloved sport for over 25 years now.

> Cigarettes are a legal product, that can be sold without a
> prescription to the vast majority of viewers of NASCAR. The government
> shouldn't proscribe the advertising of a legal product merely because
> SOME viewers are not old enough to buy and use it. Should we ban
> automobile ads for the same reason? After all, SOME of the audience
> won't be legally allowed to buy and use the cars being advertised, AND
> cars kill lots of people every year... And the auto-makers have worked
> for years to make cars ***ive... :-)  <-- NB

> ---Jim Sokoloff

Here in Canada, we have the same problem.  But the Stupid canadian
goverment as adopted a lwa, the C-71, and with this the Tobacco industry
is now permitted to have only 10 % of the total space they had before.
Let's take an exemple the F1 Gp of Montreal (BTW it was great!!).
Player's had many publicity on the track. With the law, next year they
will have the permition to put publicity, but with only 10% of it that
they could put the logo.  It's ridiculous.  So all the Tobacco company
have decided to go out of major events.  Montreal is known as the
capital of Festivals with over 500.  They would lost the F1gp, the
Benson and Edges International Jazz festival (biggest in the world), the
duMaurier Tennis tournament (in the G-7 of tennis). They would also lost
the Toronto AND the Vancouver CART gp.  Also, Player's had a great
developement project, that permits canadian drivers to get into high
racing series. Jacques Villeneuve, Greg Moore, Patrick Carpentier,
Bertrand Godin and many others will be without any sponsorship next
year. All this because the goverment has decided that Tobacco publicity
was making non-smokers to start smoking. Yeah sure ! (not). Tobacco do
sponsorship for 1 thing. Make people that are, per exemple, smoking
Camel's, to go smoke different types, like Winston.  It's not because I
look at Rothmans on the Jacques Villeneuve Williams-Renault car that I
directly to the market to buy Rothmands cigarettes. I don't smoke.  Most
smokers started smoking because of their friends, to look cool. Not
because they saw a Malboro logo on Al Unser's CART car.  Also, you are
all lucky in US because you will not have a anti-tobacco rude law.  Here
in Canada it's simple. No publicity.  Witch means it is against the
Liberty of speaking and publishing.  Freedom of speech, like freedom of
publishing, is a fondamental thing in our world.  We fight against it,
and now the Canada goverment is installing an anti-tobacco law.  Without
any sence.  So the great F1 Gp of Canada, the Vancouver and Toronto CART
race will be lost, but it will affect all of the Leisure and sports
activity in Canada.  I only hope that we, quebecers, will one day get
seperated... (Only canadians can catch this)

With great respect,
Good race at the Brickyard,  (-o-)    

SPEED- Co-director
SPEED- Cars, WC, BGN, Trucks, IROC, utilities and more...
SPEED- http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Lieutenant Nien Numb, Gold squadron NSWL
http://www.racesimcentral.net/;
May the force be with you, always!!

- *Excuse me for my poor English(I'm French speaking) * -

Kai Fulle

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Kai Fulle » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Jim what they are saying is that, if a car is operated properly no one is
going to die, but no matter how you smoke, it will kill you.


> By the same argument then (which I agree with, BTW), cigarettes have
> never killed anyone.
> ---Jim

John Twitchel

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by John Twitchel » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Cigarettes are the only legal product that when use as directed can kill.

--
John







> >> Should we ban
> >>automobile ads for the same reason? After all, SOME of the audience
> >>won't be legally allowed to buy and use the cars being advertised, AND
> >>cars kill lots of people every year...

> >Sorry Jim, but I've never seen or heard of a car killing anyone. Lots of
> >people kill other people (or preferably themselves) with cars but it's
> >not the cars' fault!

> By the same argument then (which I agree with, BTW), cigarettes have
> never killed anyone.

> ---Jim

mgran

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by mgran » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00

This raises an interesting question in regards to the NROS. How is this
situation going to affect the NROS as far as sponsorship that may have
been decided prior to this ruling. I know it may not be that relevant at
this point but I'm more curious how this affects the administrators of
the NROS as far as the sponsorship itself goes. Do they have to find new
sponsors and remname some of the divisions like I'm sure they will have
to in the real series.


>        I can't resist putting my 2 cent's in on this subject, although
> I'm probably contributing to something that shouldn't be in this
> newsgroup to begin with.
>        We've got all of these people and groups that decide what
> we should see, do, have, etc.  Where does it stop?  Today it's
> the tobacco and *** advertising in sports.  Tomorrow it might
> be the sports themselves.  I mean, lets face it.  It's already been
> tried and accomplished for some sports.  What are you all going
> to say when it's deemed by some group that auto racing should
> be banned because it causes injury and sometimes death to
> drivers and fans alike?  "Well, the fan was killed because he
> was attracted to be in a dangerous situation, if the temptation
> wouldn't have been there, he/she would still be alive."  Far
> fetched?  You better wake up!  These groups talk about the
> risks of smoking, and that people are unaware.....PLEASE!
> Children are unaware, and as parents we should teach them
> of these hazards.  Now, a tobacco or *** company that
> camps outside of a concert, high school, or festival of some
> kind, and gives away samples to minors, let's prosecute and
> do something about it.
>        Today I'm forced by law to conform to all kinds of laws that
> affect only my own life or health, like wear a seatbelt when I drive
> or ride in a motor vehicle, wear a helmet on a motorcycle, etc, etc.
> These are the kinds of laws that in my opinion have no place.
> I'm not saying that their reasoning behind them are without merit,
> just that it should be my choice.  Now, a law that requires a parent
> to strap his/her child in a carseat or seatbelt.  This has some merit.
> The child doesn't know these things, and unfortunately there are
> parents that ignore these types of things.
>        Cigarettes and *** are legal substances.  These companies
> should have the same right as any other business to advertise their
> product.  We as a society are slowly but surely hacking away at
> our rights that built this country.  If a business or company breaks
> the laws by using fraudulent or misleading advertising, prosecute
> them for it.
>        Anyway, sorry for the long post.  I didn't intend to ramble on
> about this.  And no, I'm not part of a militant group out dwelling
> on government intervention.  I'm just a little tired of some of the
> piddly laws imposed on this society for "our own good".

> Take care,

> Shawn Wise
> Midwest Motorsports
> ProHCS3,HGNS3,
> & HTS2 on Hawaii

Jim Sokolof

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Jim Sokolof » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> This raises an interesting question in regards to the NROS. How is this
> situation going to affect the NROS as far as sponsorship that may have
> been decided prior to this ruling. I know it may not be that relevant at
> this point but I'm more curious how this affects the administrators of
> the NROS as far as the sponsorship itself goes. Do they have to find new
> sponsors and remname some of the divisions like I'm sure they will have
> to in the real series.

Largely thanks to California (which prohibits in-state sales of computer
game products which include *** and tobacco), Papyrus games do not
include *** or tobacco sponsors. Thus, I don't think NROS will be
affected at all.

---Jim

Dan Raymon

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Dan Raymon » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> Racing will survive this very well.  We don't need RJR.

> The tobacco industry just admitted:

> 1.  That cigarettes are ***ive.
> 2.  That they have caused the public _billions_ of dollars in health care
> costs.
> 3.  That too many children smoke.

> Why would we want our beloved sport identified with this product?

> I'm an avid race fan, former road racer, NASCAR2 fanatic.  Racing will
> survive this very well.  The fans are there, the sponsors will come.  We
> don't need RJR.

>                         bob

These things may all be true, but it isn't like we were all ignorantly
duped.  You make it sound like millions of Americans were smoking for
years believing it to be completely harmless, and then lo and behold we
all of the sudden discovered in just the last five years that these
little things are harmful to us. "Why those dirty little...we're going
get them.  They sure pulled the wool over our eyes."  Comeone it has
been well documented for decades and decades that smoking is harmful.
Shoot my grandfather told me the reason he didn't take of smoking in
WWII like so many GIs did was that he knew it was bad for his health.
They called them cancer sticks back then.
SimRaci

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by SimRaci » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00

There won't be any tobacco or alchohol ads.

S

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by S » Tue, 24 Jun 1997 04:00:00


says...

Damn Shawn,
 Great post, only problem I have with it is I didn't post it myself.

SG
::::For those who have died for our freedom, must they die again?::::

CR Ridl

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by CR Ridl » Wed, 25 Jun 1997 04:00:00


>Largely thanks to California (which prohibits in-state sales of computer
>game products which include *** and tobacco), Papyrus games do not
>include *** or tobacco sponsors. Thus, I don't think NROS will be
>affected at all.
>---Jim

Does this mean that people in California are not allowed to play
"Redneck Rampage"?  Damn....

CR

Key Lar

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Key Lar » Wed, 25 Jun 1997 04:00:00



>Cigarettes are the only legal product that when use as directed can kill.

>--
>John


Well, OK,  
a cigarette and a handgun...

Oh, and RAID Ant & Roach Spray...

and a mousetrap...

<Rant mode ON>

Here's the deal.

Removing liquor advertising from Radio & Television in the seventies
(or sixties, whenever it was) did not stop people from buying Tequila,
Rum, Whiskey or Vodka.

Removing cigarette advertising from Radio & Television in the nineties
will not stop people from buying Marlboro's, Winston's, Benson &
Hedges, etc.

The threat of having a "WARNING LABEL" on records/tapes/CD's did not
suddenly cause the return of "The Osmonds" or "The Archies" to the top
of the record sales charts.

"Wage Controls" during the Nixon Administration did not stop inflation
in the 70's. If anything, it helped to increase the gap between the
"have more than enoughs" and the "ain't got enoughs".

The hormones of a 13 year old boy don't "settle down" just because he
can't see the cover of Playboy at the 7-11.

The "War on ***" doesn't seem to have gotten off the ground in
Southern California.

..."if only Uncle Sam had more money to work with"...he could still
find a way to put more in his pocket and accomplish less per dollar.

----

Unfortunately, there is a large (enough) percentage of the population
that really believes everything that the TV tells them without taking
a moment to actually think about the hidden costs behind the agenda
being praised on the TV.

Corporate sponsorship of major events is a "private sector" subsidy.
Winston Cup is just one example. The Playboy Jazz Festival is another.
Non-smokers and non-drinkers benefit from the competition for the
bigger purses, larger team budgets to develop better/faster machines
and crews, lower ticket prices and cleaner facilities enabled by the
corporate sponsorship of the cigarette and *** producing sponsors
as much as those who hold a Winston in one hand, and a Coors Light in
the other hand. The last time I went to the Playboy Jazz Festival, it
did not resemble "Poker Night with the Boys".

I am a fan of Winston Cup Racing, although I would prefer that my 6-
and 3-year old nieces not smoke, and I prefer Dunhills. I go to the
Playboy Jazz Festival for the music, and I think the last time I
purchased a Playboy was the issue with the interview with Frank Zappa.
I go to other concerts at a Coors Light sponsored venue, but I would
rather have a Sapporo with my sushi...it just tastes better to me. I
enjoyed the Budweiser lizard spots during the Cal 500, but I was
drinking Pepsi. (Oh, no, Gordon drank Pepsi in Victory Circle) <g>

Vote with your conscience. Vote with your dollars. No sponsor has ever
held a gun to your head and forced you to buy their product.

Education is the key, not Government Regulation. Take responsibility
for the education you provide your children, or fail to provide them
as the case may be. The Government will not keep your kids from
smoking cigarettes, and will not help your kids do their homework.
That's your job.

<Rant mode OFF>

Key Largo
Nascar2 Rookie

(who refuses to send his money to any evangelist who can afford to buy
time on a Television station, ESPECIALLY those who can afford to buy
the entire Television station).

BSPN

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by BSPN » Wed, 25 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Man, this subject always gets me going <G>. I don't smoke, hate smoking,
and I don't live in NC so smoking is not part of my economy. However, as
it stands right now, smoking and tobacco are legal, and as such, should
be allowed to do business in a reasonable manner. I don't think they
should be using cartoon camels, and I don't think Smoking Joe has often
started a kid smoking that wouldn't have started either way. As we all
know, most beer and smoking ads are more effective as brand switching,
than recruitment(sp?). This is a political smoke screen (if you'll
excuse the pun). It it's legal, let them run their business with
reasonable restrictions. If you really want to help stamp out smoking
then tax the hell out of it and at least raise some revenue to offset
the cost of smoking for the rest of us. Ban it in public places, it
infringes on non-smokers rights, and remember, your rights end where
another's begins. But advertising isn't the problem. These advertising
restrictions just look good on the democrats (I am one) resumes, but
they totally miss the point.

Lou B.



> > Racing will survive this very well.  We don't need RJR.

> > The tobacco industry just admitted:

> > 1.  That cigarettes are ***ive.
> > 2.  That they have caused the public _billions_ of dollars in health care
> > costs.
> > 3.  That too many children smoke.

> > Why would we want our beloved sport identified with this product?

> > I'm an avid race fan, former road racer, NASCAR2 fanatic.  Racing will
> > survive this very well.  The fans are there, the sponsors will come.  We
> > don't need RJR.

> >                         bob

> These things may all be true, but it isn't like we were all ignorantly
> duped.  You make it sound like millions of Americans were smoking for
> years believing it to be completely harmless, and then lo and behold we
> all of the sudden discovered in just the last five years that these
> little things are harmful to us. "Why those dirty little...we're going
> get them.  They sure pulled the wool over our eyes."  Comeone it has
> been well documented for decades and decades that smoking is harmful.
> Shoot my grandfather told me the reason he didn't take of smoking in
> WWII like so many GIs did was that he knew it was bad for his health.
> They called them cancer sticks back then.

Michael E. Carve

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Michael E. Carve » Wed, 25 Jun 1997 04:00:00


: Cigarettes are the only legal product that when use as directed can kill.

Many families of people killed by firearms don't agree with you on this
one.

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Gidra

Winston RJR vs. Govermental Stooges

by Gidra » Wed, 25 Jun 1997 04:00:00

HMMMM.......How about "The Microsoft Cup" ? :-)

---------------------------------
"Hell, what they ought to do is just give everybody a
drank o' likker and drop the green flag"---Buck Baker


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.