I'll let the numbers do the talking first:
My setup:
Asus A7V333 (KT333 chipset)
AMD AthlonXP 2000+
512MB PC2700
MSI GeForce 4 Ti4200
3dMark 2001: 9,500 to 10,700 depending on clocks (stock everything, slow
timings to 141FSB, 280/580 on the video card, and fast timings)
My roommate's setup:
ECS K7S5A (SIS 735 Chipset)
AMD AthlonXP 1700+
512MB PC2100
MSI GeForce 4 Ti4200 (identical to mine)
3dMark 2001: 8,000 to 8,700 depending on clocks (stock to 148FSB; no RAM
timing changes, it's cheapo CAS2.5)
I know, you're saying now that there's a decent spec gap between there...but
even with his clocked up to near mine (the 512MB PC2100 is actually mine...I
upgraded to PC2700 because I got it for about $90 on eBay, hehe) he still
has the better part of a 1000-point deficit.
Does it make a huge difference in games or real-world performance, though?
Not really, but it is there and tangible. The SIS735 isn't a bad chipset,
but if you're a benchmark ***, you'll see a big difference.
FWIW, I also had a K7S5A as my upgrade from the BX board...I got "this"
(there's very little left of it now, LOL) computer close to two years ago
now, as my dad and I built it originally in '98, with an Abit BH6 and a
unstable at anything over 300...and 300 was a bit of a crapshoot...dropped
in a Celly 900, which toasted itself after 3 months *grr*...and got a K7S5A
/ Duron 1.2 to replace it. Which I kept for...LOL...four months! Replaced
the K7S5A with a Gigabyte GA-7VRXP...then the 1.2 with a 2000+...then when I
toasted the 7VRXP (screwdriver kill, first ever), with an A7V333...
I need to cut myself off soon...and yet I'm already eagerly awaiting the
release of the Thoroughbred-B0 steppings of the 1700+ and 1800+. They
should be instant 333MHz FSB 2000+ chips... *cackle*
Milhouse