rec.autos.simulators

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

Don Wilsh

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Don Wilsh » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Papyrus:

It appears that NRO and TEN is a long long way off.  Even
if it is implemented it will be a long distance phone call
for most of us.  

Suggestions:

1).     Why dont you just put in an accounting system in HAWAII and
        charge us.

2).     Why dont you go ahead and upgrade HAWAII to NASCAR 2.

Don Wilshe, IVGA

Eric T. Busc

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Eric T. Busc » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00

While no one can comment on the timeframe of the NRO's release, what makes
you think it will require a LD call?  TEN can run over your existing TCP/IP
connection.  Assuming you have a local ISP, you would only encounter LD
charges if you wanted to use one of TEN's enhanced connections and there
isn't one in your local calling area.  BTW, from my very limited testing of
TEN (mainly playing Quake DM) I've found my account here at Emory to be
faster than TEN's 'enhanced' dial-up connection.

--



Blak

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Blak » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00

DITTO!!!!


> Papyrus:

> It appears that NRO and TEN is a long long way off.  Even
> if it is implemented it will be a long distance phone call
> for most of us.

> Suggestions:

> 1).     Why dont you just put in an accounting system in HAWAII and
>         charge us.

And get rid of the long distance!!
myke

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by myke » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> Papyrus:

> It appears that NRO and TEN is a long long way off.  Even
> if it is implemented it will be a long distance phone call
> for most of us.

> Suggestions:

> 1).     Why dont you just put in an accounting system in HAWAII and
>         charge us.

> 2).     Why dont you go ahead and upgrade HAWAII to NASCAR 2.

> Don Wilshe, IVGA

Wasn't there something about Sierra not being allowed to have a
commercial online service due to some agreement (selling a previous one)

mykey

Ronnie Bigwhi

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Ronnie Bigwhi » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> Papyrus:

> It appears that NRO and TEN is a long long way off.  Even
> if it is implemented it will be a long distance phone call
> for most of us.

> Suggestions:

> 1).     Why dont you just put in an accounting system in HAWAII and
>         charge us.

> 2).     Why dont you go ahead and upgrade HAWAII to NASCAR 2.

> Don Wilshe, IVGA

  I agree 100% they could get a 1-800 number and maybe charge a monthly
fee even. I don,t have a credit card and I'm going to have to buy a hard
drive just to play N2 in windows without skips.
tom..

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by tom.. » Sun, 08 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Nod, I think I too recall reading about a "non-competitive" agreement
when AT&T got ahold of "ImagiNation". Typical of attorney's :-)

Andy

Ed Benso

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Ed Benso » Mon, 09 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> Papyrus:

> It appears that NRO and TEN is a long long way off.  Even
> if it is implemented it will be a long distance phone call
> for most of us.

> Suggestions:

> 1).     Why dont you just put in an accounting system in HAWAII and
>         charge us.

> 2).     Why dont you go ahead and upgrade HAWAII to NASCAR 2.

> Don Wilshe, IVGA

It's not often I agree with Don, but he has a good point here. Of
course, as long as Hawaii is a long distance call, an additional usage
fee could be prohibitive. I don't really see a need for it either. Free
net-play sites have proven very succesful for other companies (e.g.
battle.net, et al). On the other hand, I would be willing to pay if it's
not too expensive.
As to some of the follow-ups in this thread, I don't think an 800 number
would be feasible. Papyrus would then have to pay the LD charges, and
with the resulting increase in usage I'm sure they would soon go broke
with this approach.
However, I would think that there is some way that local-access numbers
could be implemented. I don't expect Papy to build their own network,
but I'll bet there's some way they could partner with someone who is
already established, adding new lines and utilising existing servers.
This is just a guess, I don't know much about the tech involved, but I'm
sure there is some way this could be accomplished. With local-access
Papyrus could charge a small fee, either a charge by time or a monthly
flat-rate, that would be much less then what we currently pay for the
long-distance connection, but still make a fair profit for Papy.

--
Ed


Mike

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Mike » Tue, 10 Jun 1997 04:00:00

How about a 800# and a monthly charge? The turnout would be awesome!
I have been wishing this since HAWAII started. "TEN SUX,  and yes I was a
member for a month."

Just an unlikely dream,
Mike


> DITTO!!!!


> > Papyrus:

> > It appears that NRO and TEN is a long long way off.  Even
> > if it is implemented it will be a long distance phone call
> > for most of us.

> > Suggestions:

> > 1).     Why dont you just put in an accounting system in HAWAII and
> >         charge us.

> And get rid of the long distance!!
> > 2).     Why dont you go ahead and upgrade HAWAII to NASCAR 2.

> > Don Wilshe, IVGA

motisk

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by motisk » Tue, 10 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> How about a 800# and a monthly charge? The turnout would be awesome!
> I have been wishing this since HAWAII started. "TEN SUX,  and yes I was a
> member for a month."

> Just an unlikely dream,
> Mike

I agree an 800# would be great.  Ive been on hawaii since april of last
year and have yet had any major problems but getting booted and not
being able to get back into the race:(  i wish they would do it to so we
can run nascar2 out of dos instead of ten and win95....

--
--------------------------------------------------------
Brian Motisko

http://members.aol.com/bmotisko/private/index.htm
--------------------------------------------------------

Jim Sokolof

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Jim Sokolof » Tue, 10 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> However, I would think that there is some way that local-access numbers
> could be implemented. I don't expect Papy to build their own network,
> but I'll bet there's some way they could partner with someone who is
> already established, adding new lines and utilising existing servers.

Yeah, something a lot like what TEN is doing... :-)

---Jim

Shawn Wi

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Shawn Wi » Wed, 11 Jun 1997 04:00:00


       Although on the surface this sounds really great, I think that
unless Papy/Sierra were to have some major sponsership backing,
it would end up costing you more than what you pay in Hawaii long
distance charges right now.  The last time that I checked, for you
to have an 800 #, your customers are getting thier calls to you for
free, but you are responsible for a .13 cents/min charge to get that
customers call.  Now, add this to the need for a business to make
a profit, or break even for that matter, and what would it cost us?
.20, .25 cents/min?  Just some food for thought.

Take care,

Shawn Wise
Midwest Motorsports
ProHCS3 & HGNS3 on Hawaii

Bob Stanle

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Bob Stanle » Wed, 11 Jun 1997 04:00:00



>> However, I would think that there is some way that local-access numbers
>> could be implemented. I don't expect Papy to build their own network,
>> but I'll bet there's some way they could partner with someone who is
>> already established, adding new lines and utilising existing servers.

>Yeah, something a lot like what TEN is doing... :-)

>---Jim

What I dont understand is, why TEN and why not SIGS? Maybe the thought
was that TEN had the resources and would be able to succesfully get
NROS running before they could do it on SIGS. I also remember a post some
months back that referenced a non-compitetion agreement but then you goto
the Sierra web site and theres all kinds of stuff about SIGS. It doesnt
really matter except that I'm about as loyal a customer to Sierra/Papy
as you will find and I too am getting tired of the marketeers coming
out with these big announcments, then it seems they tie the tech guys
from answering alot of questions. IMHO,  if you announce something and
it slips, no big deal as long as you come back and give some fairly
specific examples of what and where they're (Sierra/Papy/TEN)at in the
process. A great example of this is Adam telling us that there will be
no more AI changes in N2. We may not understand it or like it, but we
know the deal and after a few flames, most of the time reason comes
through and people understand.  At a minimum, they are informed. In
my mind Sierra/Papy does 2 out of 3 things excellently;
1) IMHO, nobody comes close to providing racing simulations as good as Papy.
2) IMHO, Papy does an excellent job of providing tech support. Its never taken
longer than 2 or 3 days to get an answer back from either hawaii_help or tech
support.

As far as new product announcements, I think that falls in the needs lots of
work category. Again, this is my opinion. If the guys at Sierra/Papy in charge
of promotion, adverti***t, whatever labor catogory they put that into would put
the effort into just providing the info the tech guys do. They would be 3 for 3!
It seems to me, this thread is more a plead for information.
Sorry for the long post. Thanks for taking the time to read it.
Regards,
Bob

Bob_Stanley on Hawaii
LightSpeed! MotorSports www.cfw.com/~aldhizer/lightspeed.html

Jim Sokolof

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Jim Sokolof » Thu, 12 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> What I dont understand is, why TEN and why not SIGS?

My (admittedly limited) understanding of what SIGS is doing is that SIGS
is not suitable for consitently low latency ***, which a
wheel-to-wheel racing game requires. (For all of you know-it-alls who
are going to contest that point, go ahead, but I'm not going to bother
to refute it logically again; I'll just ignore...)

Papyrus has historically been incredibly tight-lipped about upcoming
products. Sierra has historically been much more forthcoming. I think
this is one case in which the Sierra acquisition is a good thing for
you. (Not that Sierra does up to the minute releases, but if Papy was on
its own, you probably would know about Grand Prix Legends yet...)

---Jim

Bob Stanle

UPGRADE HAWAII to NASCAR 2

by Bob Stanle » Thu, 12 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Bob wrote;
   I assume you meant 'would not'

Jim,

I sincerely hope that you didnt think I was blaming that on Sierra. I have no
idea who is responsible for what when it comes to how Papy and Sierra do
business.  Although, I would venture to say that if we continue to get just
little pieces of info here and there about product releases and thier status,
maybe Papy's way of thinking is better. At least everyone would'nt be so spun up
all the time. To put it in simplist terms;
You know how your dog gets when you put a piece of meat in front of him then
tell him he cant have it yet? He slobbers, wiggles, and generally gets
frustrated. Thats if he's well behaved. If he isnt, he takes the meat and
your hand with it. I realize I'm preaching to the choir here. Hopefully,
the information flow will get better. If not, it doesnt mean I'll stop buying
Sierra/Papy products because I still consider 2 outa 3 aint bad.  
Sit Uboo Sit!
Regards,
Bob

Bob_Stanley
LightSpeed! MotorSports www.cfw.com/~aldhizer/lightspeed.html


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.