>> I just patched up my DOS version 1.0.2 to the Win95 version 1.0.1 and
>> found
>> that the game plays more jerky (frame rate wise) and that the sound is
>> really bad in Win95. The DOS version is way better and is smoother
>> also.
>> I'm running on a AMD5x86-133(oc160MHz) with 20MB RAM.
>> --
>> Kenny Ho
>I STRONGLY agree! The Win95 version SUCKS compared to the DOS version.
>Even on a P166 w/16megs it was accessing the HD and had a very jerky
>frame rate. I went back to the DOS version for good. I can't
>understand how it's supposed to be better than the DOS version. It does
>have some very neat new ways of displaying things but the acutual racing
>is no where near the DOS version.
>Sal V.
Guess I'll be the lone voice of dissent :-) I love the WIN95 version.
I would use it all the time if the palette on the converted tracks
worked right. I'm running a new Supermicro Motherboard with a Cyrix
P166+ processer. I have 48 meg of ram (32 EDO + 16 Fast Page DRAM)
and a Diamond Stealth 64 with 2 meg DRAM. I don''t get any of the
aforementioned HDD access and my framerate is only 1-2 FPS off of my
ICR2 DOS numbers. The only dissapointment for me is the short replay
length, but I can live with that.
One question, have you folks gone into the advanced settings and made
sure your memory slider is in the green? The docs indicate that if you
are in the yellow you will get occasional HDD access and if you are in
the red you will constant HDD access.
Chris Drake