Can we start a thread stating what hardware you have, and the sort of frame
rates you're getting in F1C?
Currently I'm getting late 30s to low 50s in 800x600 with everything on low,
averaging about 40, with an athlon 2400+, GF2 MMX 32Mb, 256Mb RAM.
I'd like to see what people are getting with a similar setup, but a GF4 Ti
4200.
I think for the game to run properly, you need to at least be in the 40s,
probably with a target of 50 FPS for optimal performance.
Thanks.
R.
19 fps min to 27 fps max
average 23 fps
AD
MadDAWG
AA set to -4 Quincux and Aniso at -2
AD
> > GF1 DDR (no o/c)
> > 128 SDRam 100
> Holy ***my email computer is "bigger' than that. I can't even imagine
> trying to play todays games on that. You must really have that thing tweaked
> to even get that kind of performance. Good Job.
http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=ddrroundup&page=2
There is my card in a shootout.
Can you see it Hophead....?
Can you see all those GeForce DDR cards...?
Or does this still apply...?
Hophead said " ...He's got something tweaked. The GF1 ran SDR mem ..."
Have a nice day
AD
... 900 mhz Celeron, ASUS CUSL2 mobo, 384 meg PC133 RAM, SBLive audio, XP
Pro, 1024x768x16, most detail levels in the medium to high range, no AA or
aniso, frame rates below 20 at race start to 50 or so on an empty test
track.
... 2.4 ghz P4C, ASUS P4P800 mobo, 512 meg dual channel DDR RAM, onboard
audio, XP Pro, 1024x768x32, most detail levels high to full, no AA or aniso,
frame rates around 30 at race start to 100 or so on an empty test track.
> In reply to HOPHEAD maybe you should read a little :)
No, the GF1 didn't run DDR d00d.
> ... 900 mhz Celeron, ASUS CUSL2 mobo, 384 meg PC133 RAM, SBLive audio, XP
> Pro, 1024x768x16, most detail levels in the medium to high range, no AA or
> aniso, frame rates below 20 at race start to 50 or so on an empty test
> track.
> ... 2.4 ghz P4C, ASUS P4P800 mobo, 512 meg dual channel DDR RAM, onboard
> audio, XP Pro, 1024x768x32, most detail levels high to full, no AA or
aniso,
> frame rates around 30 at race start to 100 or so on an empty test track.
> > Guys,
> > Can we start a thread stating what hardware you have, and the sort of
> frame
> > rates you're getting in F1C?
In the days of buying the GeForce DDR card we didnt call it a GeForce 1(GF1)
because there hadnt been a GeForce 2 yet.
But NOW we have many subsequent cards we often refer to the original GeForce
as the GF1.
The GeForce (GF1) came in two versions,i purchased both as i have two pc's
in a home lan.
The SDR version was simply called the GeForce 256
The DDR version was called the GeForce DDR.
And finally to awake your obvious dead brain from its pathetic slumber,here
is Nvidias official listing of official cards ,i havent taken the whole list
as it isnt relevant,but juts the part of the list that shows even a dumb a$$
like you that you are without doubt wrong.
Products Supported: RIVA TNT
Aladdin TNT2
TNT2
TNT2 Pro
TNT2 Ultra
TNT2 Model 64 (M64)
TNT2 Model 64 (M64) Pro
Vanta
Vanta LT
GeForce 256
GeForce DDR
GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX 100
GeForce2 MX 200
GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 GTS
GeForce2 Pro
GeForce2 Ti
GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce3
GeForce3 Ti 200
GeForce3 Ti 500
GeForce4 MX 460
GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X
GeForce4 MX440SE with AGP8X
GeForce4 MX 420
Go see the whole list yourself sometime so you can learn a little about the
things you know nothing about.It is here
http://www.nvidia.com/content/drivers/drivers.asp
You sad child
AD
Hophead is still right that enabling FSAA/AF on it is crazy.
Andrew.
Called funnily enough the GeForce 2 Pro
AD
AD
