rec.autos.simulators

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

Alex Smit

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Alex Smit » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 03:37:20

Jeez, throw him a friggin bone here.  Video cards are related to ***
performance and some people who play games may know more about
them (from a *** perspective) than people in a videocard-specific
group, who could tell you about the transistor design but not whether it
runs Nascar 2002 at 1600x1200 FSAA...etc at 60fps.

Although I do agree that cross-posting is usually a stupid thing to do
anyhows.

magnulu

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by magnulu » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 05:44:57

  The Radeon 9700 looks great.  I think the main drawback right now is the
price, for all but the most ardent devotees.  For current games, the
incredibly fast anisotropic filtering and antialiasing look to be the reason
to get this card.  I have an older monitor that really cannot do above
1024X768 without some screen flicker, but my current Radeon doesn't really
have the memory bandwith to support antialiasing at that resolution above
2X, even then some games, particularly the newer ones, will run slower.

  If you had a much older card, the Radeon 9700 would probably be worth it.
It has a feature set and raw power that is going to make it a powerful card
for some time to come- Truform 2.0, displacement mapping, 128 bit color, and
so on.  The difference between the 9700 and the older Radeons is much bigger
than the GeForce 4 to the GeForce 3.


Betelgeus

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Betelgeus » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:27:24

Awesome card! I can play pretty much every game out there in high resolution
(1024x768 and up) with a minimum of 4x FSAA and 16x anisotropic filtering
with no slowdowns or jerkiness whatsoever. Image quality is superb on all
accounts and the antialiasing has to be the best out there, with small or no
performance hit (depends largely on the application.)
In short, I LOVE this card!

Betelgeuse,
Armpit of the Giant

=============================================
"I Am Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds!"
=============================================

"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the
Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost
in time, like tears in rain..."
    -Roy Batty
    Blade Runner

betelg [ at ] cogeco [ dot ] ca


magnulu

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by magnulu » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:53:32

  Yeah, panic trolling.  NVidia has gotten their ass handed to them for a
change, and the NVidiots have no response.

   ATI releases drivers every month or so, and their driver support is
fairly good.  I don't know how it benchmarks against NVidia drivers, but
frankly I am concerned more with stability than Q3 scores, and overall they
have been very good.




> > ATI is known for very poor drivers and little if ANY updated drivers.

> yes, like AMD is know for CPU's that cause instable systems and CPU's that
> go up in smokes :)

> seriously, I didn't buy an original Radeon because of some of thos issues
> (and lacking brute force power) but form everything I've read, drivers are
> stable now

Mike Beaucham

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Mike Beaucham » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:50:49

That's such a dated comment.

ATI just released a whole new batch of drivers in August for to be
completely compatible with XP SP1. For the past while, ATI has been working
it's arse off releasing drivers and fixing "bugs" and such.

I've been using ATI cards for the past 1.5 years, and I only ran into 1 bug.
It kept causing my early version of Max Payne to crash at a certain spot. I
had just updated the drivers a few weeks ago too. So I checked ATI's site,
and sure enough, a new set of drivers were available. and sure enough, it
fixed the problem and increased general frame rate to boot!

Nvidia seems to be a large company, and seems to get in a lot of ass kissing
sessions with reviewers and such. Also, a lot of Nvidia people seem to be
the ones telling me that "ATI has bad drivers". Then when I ask them why
they say that, they just say "that's what I've heard".

It TOTALLY reminds me of when I am trying to build a computer for someone. I
suggest to them to get AMD processors to save lots of money, and they
sometimes reply "don't AMD processors like, not work with windows, and catch
on fire or something?". Then when I ask why they said that they replay
"that's just what I've heard".

Sorry to go off on a tangent... I'm bored.
Mike
http://www.racesimcentral.net/


> ATI is known for very poor drivers and little if ANY updated drivers.





> > > Nvidia ***?

> > No - they just didnt get rid of drivers properly

> > I'm very wary of ATI after drive nightmares with an orig. Radeon - but
the
> > 9700 does appear to be a real performer ( unlike the poor Parhalia)

> > Doug

Crash

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Crash » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:23:20





>> ATI is known for very poor drivers and little if ANY updated drivers.

>yes, like AMD is know for CPU's that cause instable systems and CPU's that
>go up in smokes :)

>seriously, I didn't buy an original Radeon because of some of thos issues
>(and lacking brute force power) but form everything I've read, drivers are
>stable now

I have an 8500.  Drivers are fine.  Updated frequently, too.

Crash7
Please remove x's from email address.
Feces occurs.

Dere

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Dere » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:13:54

I used an ATI card for years and never had any trouble at all. Ran smoothly,
no bugs. Fairly regular driver updates.

Ohh I heard this type of thing from lots of "genuises" at local computer
shows just recently. I can't believe people still say this type of
thing..."AMD isn't Windows compatible!"..."It will burst into flames!". It
was hard to resist a chuckle hearing this stuff. :)

Derek
Stormcloud Creations
http://www.stormcloudcreations.com

David Powel

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by David Powel » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:21:04

this is relevent you fool....



> > From the tests and benchmarks this card is a rather large jump ahead of
> >the GF4. Much gained fps increase compared to the usual 'newly released'
> >card yet no one seems to have noticed or cared?

> Hello newbie,

> This (where I am following up to this crossposted message) is a
> newsgroup for discussing about PC action games. Not usually about new
> videocards, unless related to running certain action game etc.

> There are separate newsgroups for discussing about videocards. Maybe
> you should check them?

Bill Leamin

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Bill Leamin » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:30:03


> It TOTALLY reminds me of when I am trying to build a computer for someone. I
> suggest to them to get AMD processors to save lots of money, and they
> sometimes reply "don't AMD processors like, not work with windows, and catch
> on fire or something?". Then when I ask why they said that they replay
> "that's just what I've heard".

While I agree with you regarding ATI cards (I have a total of 57 running here in
our A/V Studio system...

I've *seen* AMD processors overheat and catch fire (after a fan failure)!  So,
while I still have a few of 'em running, the fan(s) are monitored closely.  :)

Bill
--
Fr. Bill Leaming

"After totaling his Nissan, he said, "Mea Maxima culpa."
"Hobbits network with Tolkien Ring adapters..."
"Honest Officer! The dwarf was on fire when I got here."
"How come pizza gets to your house faster than the police?"


Personal Website:            http://catholic-hymns.com/frbill
Catholic Hymns Website:      http://catholic-hymns.com
Shared Contemplative Insight: http://sci-world.org

Dave Henri

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Dave Henri » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:34:04

"none"
  Yes Mr. None,  I agree with Powell.  ANYTHING that improves your sim is ON
TOPIC here.  Ergo discussions about new vid cards are entirely appropriate.
  Video Newsgroups DO have a place and we can probably learn from them, but
generally they wouldn't have a clue about how to tweek a vid card for better
simming.
dave henrie

Jim Lasco

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Jim Lasco » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:59:51


> From the tests and benchmarks this card is a rather large jump ahead of
> the GF4. Much gained fps increase compared to the usual 'newly released'
> card yet no one seems to have noticed or cared?

> Anyone get one yet and want to share their views?
> http://www.sudhian.com/docs.cfm/id/224.sud

http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q3/020819/radeon9700-06.html
SBD

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by SBD » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:05:48







> >> ATI is known for very poor drivers and little if ANY updated drivers.

> >yes, like AMD is know for CPU's that cause instable systems and CPU's
that
> >go up in smokes :)

> >seriously, I didn't buy an original Radeon because of some of thos issues
> >(and lacking brute force power) but form everything I've read, drivers
are
> >stable now

> I have an 8500.  Drivers are fine.  Updated frequently, too.

yes well the 8500 as you might know is the Radeon 2
and the 8500 did have brute power, more than it's GF3 counterparts

I was talking about the plain old Radeon...

Tim Mise

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Tim Mise » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:58:56


I think those Nividiots who say that "ATI has bad drivers" are the same
people who said "The V5 FSAA is blurry"!

-Tim

FerretBil

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by FerretBil » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:12:50


Are you talking about Springs***? If so I just got floor seats for Philly
yesterday!! Is that relevant at all?????

Mark Backle

How come no talk of ATI's 9700 Pro?!

by Mark Backle » Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:24:45

yup same here.... never had a problem at all






> >> ATI is known for very poor drivers and little if ANY updated drivers.

> >yes, like AMD is know for CPU's that cause instable systems and CPU's
that
> >go up in smokes :)

> >seriously, I didn't buy an original Radeon because of some of thos issues
> >(and lacking brute force power) but form everything I've read, drivers
are
> >stable now

> I have an 8500.  Drivers are fine.  Updated frequently, too.

> Crash7
> Please remove x's from email address.
> Feces occurs.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.