rec.autos.simulators

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

Mark Daviso

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Mark Daviso » Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:03:32

Mini repost:
Other than in game options, the old vsync issue and setting the anistropic
level to 0 in .ini files, can someone list all tweaks to get the utmost
performance out of N2K2?

I feel I should be getting better framerates and suffer the occasional
stutters...

1800 XP
256 Mb DDR
GF4 MX440 (don't go there...)

I get better performace and image quality from D3D - unusual for GF cards is
that not?

Cheers,

Mark
Reading, UK

Don Burnett

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Don Burnett » Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:14:21


What kind of framerates are you getting?
What drivers are you using for your vid card?
As for the MX440, I know you said don't go there, but you do realize it
doesn't even have as much performance as the GeForce3's? They are ramped up
GeForce 2's basically. I think Nvidia really screwed up with their naming
schemes on those new MX cards.

Don Burnette

Mark Daviso

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Mark Daviso » Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:19:47


Hey, Don.

Back of field, 65% draw distance, 1024x768x16, no AA, medium mirrors, full
detail cars world, etc, min sounds heard (although cranking that up doesn't
seem to affect performance), 42 drawn ahead, 6 rear, no reflections.  Latest
Nvidia drivers.
Get usually 30-35fps at rear of field on "Driver start your engines", drops
a little depending on track (Daytona down to circa 26) as we enter the front
stretch, settles down during race once cars get spread out.
Pretty sure it's a graphics card bottleneck as I just now experimented - at
The Rock, in replay mode in***pit, fps is pretty much the same as when
playing.  This, to me, shows the 1800XP is not stretched.

About the card (I know a GF3Ti would have been better).  Just bought this
box for 370 pounds - 1800 XP, 256Mb DDR, DVD, 27Gb (I know, I know) HD,
on-board sound, GF4 MX 440.  Let me tell you - over here, for a new,
guaranteed for 1 year unit, that is frickin cheap.  I could have upped the
graphics to a Ti4200 for an extra 50 quid but the missus knocked that on the
head (where doing expensive house renovations right now).  Slapped in my
SBLive and used my existing monitor and I'm motoring - only not as fast as I
thought I would be!!

I actually think the vidcard may be duff.  I get wierd psychadelic effects
in the F12K2 demo and one of the 3DMark tests (high detail lobby) goes
apeshit.

I'm gonna take a 3Dmark disk to the retailer and see if the same thing
happens on another one of these units.

Cheers,

Mark
Reading, UK

Andre

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Andre » Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:50:00

Mark....370 is cheap..???

Pick up a copy of MicroMart at your newsagents,i buy boxes regularly for my
clients and we get alot more than you have there for cheaper.

For 370 we have XP2000+,512 DDR,60gb HDD,GF3 Ti 200 etc etc....what you
have is 270 worth matey.

Cheers

Andy

Don Burnett

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Don Burnett » Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:50:07




> > What kind of framerates are you getting?
> > What drivers are you using for your vid card?
> > As for the MX440, I know you said don't go there, but you do realize it
> > doesn't even have as much performance as the GeForce3's? They are ramped
> up
> > GeForce 2's basically. I think Nvidia really screwed up with their
naming
> > schemes on those new MX cards.

> > Don Burnette

> Hey, Don.

> Back of field, 65% draw distance, 1024x768x16, no AA, medium mirrors, full
> detail cars world, etc, min sounds heard (although cranking that up
doesn't
> seem to affect performance), 42 drawn ahead, 6 rear, no reflections.
Latest
> Nvidia drivers.
> Get usually 30-35fps at rear of field on "Driver start your engines",
drops
> a little depending on track (Daytona down to circa 26) as we enter the
front
> stretch, settles down during race once cars get spread out.
> Pretty sure it's a graphics card bottleneck as I just now experimented -
at
> The Rock, in replay mode in***pit, fps is pretty much the same as when
> playing.  This, to me, shows the 1800XP is not stretched.

> About the card (I know a GF3Ti would have been better).  Just bought this
> box for 370 pounds - 1800 XP, 256Mb DDR, DVD, 27Gb (I know, I know) HD,
> on-board sound, GF4 MX 440.  Let me tell you - over here, for a new,
> guaranteed for 1 year unit, that is frickin cheap.  I could have upped the
> graphics to a Ti4200 for an extra 50 quid but the missus knocked that on
the
> head (where doing expensive house renovations right now).  Slapped in my
> SBLive and used my existing monitor and I'm motoring - only not as fast as
I
> thought I would be!!

> I actually think the vidcard may be duff.  I get wierd psychadelic effects
> in the F12K2 demo and one of the 3DMark tests (high detail lobby) goes
> apeshit.

> I'm gonna take a 3Dmark disk to the retailer and see if the same thing
> happens on another one of these units.

I would say those framerates sound about right for the video card you ahve
in that system, yes it is the bottleneck.
At some point, if you could slap say a GeForce4 Ti4200 in that system, you
would see a very dramatic fps increase.
I would also for the time being reduce that number of cars drawn ahead, that
can have an impact on fps, I have mine set to about 15, as really it is hard
to see many more than that anyways.

Don Burnette

Biz

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Biz » Tue, 16 Jul 2002 03:58:54

Turn down the draw distance to 50% or less, you should see no difference on the track, but gain fps,
and also turn down cars ahead, down to about 15, again, it makes little impace on playability, but
greatly improves fps.
--
Biz

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash




> > What kind of framerates are you getting?
> > What drivers are you using for your vid card?
> > As for the MX440, I know you said don't go there, but you do realize it
> > doesn't even have as much performance as the GeForce3's? They are ramped
> up
> > GeForce 2's basically. I think Nvidia really screwed up with their naming
> > schemes on those new MX cards.

> > Don Burnette

> Hey, Don.

> Back of field, 65% draw distance, 1024x768x16, no AA, medium mirrors, full
> detail cars world, etc, min sounds heard (although cranking that up doesn't
> seem to affect performance), 42 drawn ahead, 6 rear, no reflections.  Latest
> Nvidia drivers.
> Get usually 30-35fps at rear of field on "Driver start your engines", drops
> a little depending on track (Daytona down to circa 26) as we enter the front
> stretch, settles down during race once cars get spread out.
> Pretty sure it's a graphics card bottleneck as I just now experimented - at
> The Rock, in replay mode in***pit, fps is pretty much the same as when
> playing.  This, to me, shows the 1800XP is not stretched.

> About the card (I know a GF3Ti would have been better).  Just bought this
> box for 370 pounds - 1800 XP, 256Mb DDR, DVD, 27Gb (I know, I know) HD,
> on-board sound, GF4 MX 440.  Let me tell you - over here, for a new,
> guaranteed for 1 year unit, that is frickin cheap.  I could have upped the
> graphics to a Ti4200 for an extra 50 quid but the missus knocked that on the
> head (where doing expensive house renovations right now).  Slapped in my
> SBLive and used my existing monitor and I'm motoring - only not as fast as I
> thought I would be!!

> I actually think the vidcard may be duff.  I get wierd psychadelic effects
> in the F12K2 demo and one of the 3DMark tests (high detail lobby) goes
> apeshit.

> I'm gonna take a 3Dmark disk to the retailer and see if the same thing
> happens on another one of these units.

> Cheers,

> Mark
> Reading, UK

Mark Daviso

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Mark Daviso » Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:51:37


Not bought Micro Mart in ages.  My last 2 PCs were cheap mail-order jobs and
I had issues with both.  Enough to be irritating but not so severe as to
jump through hoops getting them sorted out.  First was an ill fitting
motherboard meaning vidcards etc had to be held in place with blu-tack, next
had an intermittently ropey USB port and a noisy a f*ck PSU fan that sounded
like grating metal but calmed down about 3 minutes after boot-up.

Maybe my mistake, but I bought over the counter (so easy to sort issues
out), and the cheapest I could find on the net for equivalent spec was
nearer 550.

Is 270 what you can find all the components for or what you sell built
boxes at?  I know a couple of people who are interested in what I bought,
but they just want something to plug a monitor into and go.  If you've got
the kit I'll send 'em your way.

So, based on casual browsing - take DABS as example, prices include VAT and
are cheapest I can find, don't know what shipping charges are:

M/B - 50, Full Tower+PSU - 40ish (no equivalent so guess), CPU - 80 = 170ish
MX440 GFX - 63
256 DDR RAM - 60ish
16x DVD - 30
cack HD - 50

Total - 373 ish - mail order and I'd have to build it, with all the hassles
those entail.  As it is, I think my vidcard is busted, so I'll just wander
in and get it sorted.  I like that!

Seriously, though, email me a price list as I do know people who wanna buy.

All in all, I still think what I got was cheap - but obviously not as cheap
as it could have been...  All those fans are noisy, though...

Mark

Mar

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Mar » Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:12:42


> Turn down the draw distance to 50% or less, you should see no difference on the track, but gain fps,
> and also turn down cars ahead, down to about 15, again, it makes little impace on playability, but
> greatly improves fps.

Thx guys.

I find 50% is OK for most tracks but you need 65% so as not to be
distracted by grandstands being drawn at Martinsville.  Also, I like
having full field ahead as it adds to my all important "immersion
factor".  Maybe if I wasn't such an expert at qualifying at the back
end of the field this would be less of an issue...
My framerates are 100% playable at these settings, it's just I thought
I'd get a little more.  I'm currently begging the missus to allow me
to get a Ti4200 but I don't think it's gonna work.  Oh well.  Maybe at
Christmas I'll be able to get something meatier.

There was a site that I came across a while back that had a few tips
with regard to ini file mods, but search as I might, I just can't find
the sucker.

Cheers,

Mark
Reading, UK

Biz

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Biz » Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:51:23

Mark, IMO, with those settings that you seem so set on, you're not gonna get what you want with the
MX card bottom line.
--
Biz

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash



Mark Daviso

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Mark Daviso » Wed, 17 Jul 2002 06:14:12


get what you want with the

Thanks anyway, dude.  I'm only 4fps away from never going under 30fps -
thought there may be some system tweaks I could manage to eke it out.  I
reckon my 3DMark score (4200) is below par, too, and I'm almost convinced
the MX card is broken.  I've almost convinced the wife that another 50 notes
is money well spent for a Ti4200 - that's assuming that
a: the card -is- duff
b: the retailer will give me a 4200 for the MX plus difference in cost.

The system is less than a week old, but if he's got MXes lying around and
has to order in a Ti, then he may not be particularly keen...

Mark

Goy Larse

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Goy Larse » Wed, 17 Jul 2002 06:26:19




> > Mark, IMO, with those settings that you seem so set on, you're not gonna
> get what you want with the
> > MX card bottom line.

> Thanks anyway, dude.  I'm only 4fps away from never going under 30fps -
> thought there may be some system tweaks I could manage to eke it out.  I
> reckon my 3DMark score (4200) is below par, too, and I'm almost convinced
> the MX card is broken.  I've almost convinced the wife that another 50 notes
> is money well spent for a Ti4200 - that's assuming that
> a: the card -is- duff
> b: the retailer will give me a 4200 for the MX plus difference in cost.

> The system is less than a week old, but if he's got MXes lying around and
> has to order in a Ti, then he may not be particularly keen...

A score in the 4000-5000 range is the norm for a GF4MX-440 I believe, I
tested one (very) briefly to see if would serve as a short term
replacement for my V5 and got a score of about 4800, that was with a
"Golden Sample" card from Gainward

And for those who wonder, no, I yanked it out again the next day :-),
didn't sleep at all that night

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Mark Daviso

N2K2 - Help me squeeze that lst fps out...

by Mark Daviso » Thu, 18 Jul 2002 04:47:23


Thanks, uncle.
FWIW, I popped in where I bought the system and they are happy to replace my
MX440 with a Ti4200 - so long as I pay the 40 - 50 quid difference in price,
that is.  I'll be interested in what the benchmarks show then...

I'm gonna bung in my old GF2MX PCI tomorrow just for giggles so I can than
see how the 3 GF cards compare.

Mark
Reading, UK


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.