Good thing Earnhardt didnt lose 25 points everytime he gave someone the
bird. He wouldnt have won a single championship ;)
Mitch
Good thing Earnhardt didnt lose 25 points everytime he gave someone the
bird. He wouldnt have won a single championship ;)
Mitch
Cause maybe they don't want to get dragged into a pointless no-win
arguement?
Just a theory ;)
It never was a win/loss argument.
I'm done now ;)
Mitch
don't want to get dragged into a pointless no-win
> Cause maybe they don't want to get dragged into a pointless no-win
> arguement?
>
> Just a theory ;)
Interesting thought. Maybe we should have a little poll:
Please select one of the following:
1/ DGF is an all round fine guy. Well ok he may be a bit of a leftie, oh
and a veggie, not that there is anything wrong with that you understand,
and he thinks Ralf Schumacher is the next messiah and he is a bit of an
argumentative git who always has to have the last word, but apart from
all that he is my man.
2/ Mitch is an all round fine guy. Well ok he may be a shade right wing
and a little intolerant of "POS f***g liberals", reminding me of the
Kenny Everett character who said of commies "Round 'em up, put 'em in a
field, and BOMB THE BASTARDS!" Sure he is a bit of an argumentative git
who always has to have the last word, but apart from all that he is my man.
3/ DGF & Mitch should duel it out in one off winner takes all race. The
rules are simple. Both are supplied with sledge, a Yorkshire Terrier, a
bar of Kendle mint cake, a couple of tennis rackets, some woolly undies
and a compass. First to the north pole is the categoric winner of this
argument, period. A web site will track progress for keen RAS members to
follow every few weeks or so (unless there is more pressing news like
another public warning on RSC). Should the worst happen we can always
run a RASCAR memorial race which would be a nice gesture.
>> You keep on saying that like the fn child you are but fail to provide
>> anything to disprove anything Ive said except "your a liar" like any 5
>> yr old does in Kindergarten.
> maybe you should go back. it's "you're"
> > Cause maybe they don't want to get dragged into a pointless no-win
> > arguement?
> > Just a theory ;)
> Interesting thought. Maybe we should have a little poll:
> Please select one of the following:
> 1/ DGF is an all round fine guy. Well ok he may be a bit of a leftie, oh
> and a veggie, not that there is anything wrong with that you understand,
> and he thinks Ralf Schumacher is the next messiah and he is a bit of an
> argumentative git who always has to have the last word, but apart from
> all that he is my man.
> 2/ Mitch is an all round fine guy. Well ok he may be a shade right wing
> and a little intolerant of "POS f***g liberals", reminding me of the
> Kenny Everett character who said of commies "Round 'em up, put 'em in a
> field, and BOMB THE BASTARDS!" Sure he is a bit of an argumentative git
> who always has to have the last word, but apart from all that he is my
> man.
> 3/ DGF & Mitch should duel it out in one off winner takes all race. The
> rules are simple. Both are supplied with sledge, a Yorkshire Terrier, a
> bar of Kendle mint cake, a couple of tennis rackets, some woolly undies
> and a compass. First to the north pole is the categoric winner of this
> argument, period. A web site will track progress for keen RAS members to
> follow every few weeks or so (unless there is more pressing news like
> another public warning on RSC). Should the worst happen we can always
> run a RASCAR memorial race which would be a nice gesture.
My choice = All of the above.
Elrikk
I'm going to reply now though to settle this once and for all, and then
IGNORE you again. Sorry, you ARE NOT going to get your wish (and needed
attention apparently) and drag this on any further with my help. I apologize
to the other RASCAR drivers, but two weeks of been disparaged with lies,
insults and vulgarities is enough. Read Mitch's comments towards me in this
thread, and I think you'll understand.
It's impossible to reason with anyone who makes nonsensical statements in
this thread to Tony like, "Rascar is Nascar only, until dgf decides
otherwise is what I should have been told 6 months ago. I dare anyone in
RASCAR to tell me different."
Neil then tells you different, and you reply to him, "I never said DGF
decided RASCAR was Nascar only."
No RASCAR drivers have told you that your accusations are wrong? READ NEIL'S
REPLY TO YOU IN THIS THREAD. Couldn't be more clear. Read it slowly if it
doesn't sink in.
As for your accusations and lies in the post that started this thread, I'll
take it paragraph by paragraph.
> 6 months or so ago I tried to rejuvenate RASCAR's falling attendance by
> changing from NR2003 to GTR (even the rFactor test woulda worked, anything
> but Nr2003).
> I was quickly rebuffed and told RASCAR is a Nascar only series (which
> really
> pissed me off cause it was never meant to be Nascar only, right?). At
> this
> point I figured Id just wait and see what was going to happen with NSR.
> We
> all know how that worked out eh.
> Not long after I announced this JLe comes a crying about how RASCAR was in
> hiatus and was switching to rFActor and that I was stealing RASCAR rules
> blah blah blah. I was quite surprised by this fact seeing how I was told
> not long ago RASCAR was Nascar only.
> Now I see our DGF has revived RASCAR using rFactor as the sim but he has
> decided that Im no longer welcome, why? Because I saw DGF leading RASCAR
> into failure and fought to prevent it form happening? Because I voted
> against Kerry? Because I hate ponytail wearing activist asswipes? I sure
> cant think of any other reason. As I said long ago Nr2003 was great in
> its
> time but its time has passed. Thats a reason?
> Im surprised but based on his past record with RASCAR I can clearly see
> his
> motives in hindsight (eh Simmons). He wanted it all from the git go and
> now
> has it and is excluding anyone he deems should be excluded, with or
> without
> merit. This goes completely against the RASCAR charter.
> I show up expecting to run our normal fixed setup race and all of a
sudden
>Needless to say I wasnt going to go
> Im going to leave the rAS-fACTORserver up and will run Saturday races
> (along
> with a few weeknight (tues/thurs) TT shootouts). Hopefully the original
> RASCAR racers will see through the DGF bullshit and come race where
> inclusion is the rule not the exception.
> Give someone an inch and they take a mile. Typical liberal...
> As the World Turns ;)
> Mitch
Again, READ NEIL'S REPLY to you in this thread. Let it sink in. You are
either a liar, or there's something seriously wrong with you.
--
David G Fisher
> Everything Ive said is absolute fact and if I can get T. Wheatley to dig
> it up Ill show you how it happened.
> POS fucking liberals have their own version of the truth and you sure
> prove that over and over.
> Who are these so called "drivers" and why arent they coming to your
> defense if my version is so wrong? Duh...
> Sad little girl...
> "David G Fisher" <dav...@home.com> wrote in message
> news:OqGdnZnDkt2qna3eRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>> Spin?
>> You are a liar.
>> You still haven't found one RASCAR member from the last year who backs up
>> any of your ridiculous accusations against me. Do that, or STFU (and take
>> your meds).
>> --
>> David G Fisher
>> "Mitch_A" <na...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:eaJXe.766$OC2.295@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>>> Just one more addendum Larry. At the time I stopped running in RASCAR
>>> races you along with quite a few others had told me you had no interest
>>> in anything but a Nascar sim. Seeing how we werent getting a decent
>>> Nascar sim for a long time then what would you expect me to think? This
>>> was Late March and we already had GTR and rFactor wasnt all that far
>>> away (I just didnt get the tudes). Obviously very soon afterwards you
>>> all changed you rminds. These are the facts plain and simple despite
>>> DGF's spin...
>>> Mitch
> >> You keep on saying that like the fn child you are but fail to provide
> >> anything to disprove anything Ive said except "your a liar" like any 5
> >> yr old does in Kindergarten.
> > maybe you should go back. it's "you're"
> No, they don't teach that in Kindergarten. They only do the really
> simple things like learn how to start sentences with capitals at that age...
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."
--Our Lord John Cleese--
> 1/ DGF is an all round fine guy. <snip>
> 2/ Mitch is an all round fine guy. <snip>
> 3/ DGF & Mitch should duel it out in one off winner takes all race. The
> rules are simple. Both are supplied with sledge, a Yorkshire Terrier, a
> bar of Kendle mint cake, a couple of tennis rackets, some woolly undies
> and a compass. First to the north pole is the categoric winner of this
> argument, period. A web site will track progress for keen RAS members to
> follow every few weeks or so (unless there is more pressing news like
> another public warning on RSC). Should the worst happen we can always
> run a RASCAR memorial race which would be a nice gesture.
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."
--Our Lord John Cleese--
> > Cause maybe they don't want to get dragged into a pointless no-win
> > arguement?
> > Just a theory ;)
> Interesting thought. Maybe we should have a little poll:
> Please select one of the following:
> 1/ DGF is an all round fine guy. Well ok he may be a bit of a leftie, oh
> and a veggie, not that there is anything wrong with that you understand,
> and he thinks Ralf Schumacher is the next messiah and he is a bit of an
> argumentative git who always has to have the last word, but apart from
> all that he is my man.
--
David G Fisher
"David G Fisher" <dav...@home.com> wrote in message
news:huidnXXfFLg-Fa3eRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> I'm going to reply now though to settle this once and for all, and then
> IGNORE you again. Sorry, you ARE NOT going to get your wish (and needed
> attention apparently) and drag this on any further with my help. I
> apologize to the other RASCAR drivers, but two weeks of been disparaged
> with lies, insults and vulgarities is enough. Read Mitch's comments
> towards me in this thread, and I think you'll understand.
> It's impossible to reason with anyone who makes nonsensical statements in
> this thread to Tony like, "Rascar is Nascar only, until dgf decides
> otherwise is what I should have been told 6 months ago. I dare anyone in
> RASCAR to tell me different."
> Neil then tells you different, and you reply to him, "I never said DGF
> decided RASCAR was Nascar only."
> No RASCAR drivers have told you that your accusations are wrong? READ
> NEIL'S REPLY TO YOU IN THIS THREAD. Couldn't be more clear. Read it slowly
> if it doesn't sink in.
> As for your accusations and lies in the post that started this thread,
> I'll take it paragraph by paragraph.
>> Let me get this straight.
>> 6 months or so ago I tried to rejuvenate RASCAR's falling attendance by
>> changing from NR2003 to GTR (even the rFactor test woulda worked,
>> anything
>> but Nr2003).
>> I was quickly rebuffed and told RASCAR is a Nascar only series (which
>> really
>> pissed me off cause it was never meant to be Nascar only, right?). At
>> this
>> point I figured Id just wait and see what was going to happen with NSR.
>> We
>> all know how that worked out eh.
> You were never told that RASCAR was a NASCAR only series by either myself
> or the group. The FORUM LINKED FROM THE RASCAR HOME PAGE PROVES THIS. You
> dropped in last February for about a week and then left again. It's all
> there in the FORUM. Dates, posts, everything.
> Frederickson did not show up every week just to wreck you. Looking through
> the 2005 stats, I can't find either one of you listed as racing in the
> 2005 season! You raced once out of the 10 winter series races previous to
> that. He didn't race at all in the winter series. I do remember you
> claiming he intentionally wrecked you after an on track incident. Must
> have been an off week race early in the 2005 season which are not kept in
> the stats. You never even bothered to post a replay to the forum and ask
> the group to take a look at it. I DO NOT RUN RASCAR ALL BY MYSELF (as you
> claim), so I was not in a position to ban him all by myself based on the
> word of one member. It was up to YOU to provide the replay, state your
> case, and ask the group to look at the video and make a decision. The web
> site and forum PROVE what I've just stated.
>> So here we are in the present and I noticed Tony was trying to pull the
>> original RASCAR back together and he called it RAS-Factor. I took it a
>> few
>> steps further and setup a site and a server for everyone's use
>> (RAS-Factor).
>> Not long after I announced this JLe comes a crying about how RASCAR was
>> in
>> hiatus and was switching to rFActor and that I was stealing RASCAR rules
>> blah blah blah. I was quite surprised by this fact seeing how I was told
>> not long ago RASCAR was Nascar only.
>> Now I see our DGF has revived RASCAR using rFactor as the sim but he has
>> decided that Im no longer welcome, why? Because I saw DGF leading RASCAR
>> into failure and fought to prevent it form happening? Because I voted
>> against Kerry? Because I hate ponytail wearing activist asswipes? I
>> sure
>> cant think of any other reason. As I said long ago Nr2003 was great in
>> its
>> time but its time has passed. Thats a reason?
>> Im surprised but based on his past record with RASCAR I can clearly see
>> his
>> motives in hindsight (eh Simmons). He wanted it all from the git go and
>> now
>> has it and is excluding anyone he deems should be excluded, with or
>> without
>> merit. This goes completely against the RASCAR charter.
> I never said I wanted you excluded from RASCAR. No RASCAR drivers have
> ever heard or read anything from me that says I want you excluded from
> racing in RASCAR if you were to appear and race with us again. NO ONE has
> ever been banned. I do not have "it all" (READ NEIL'S REPLY TO YOU----READ
> THE FORUM). Would I personally welcome you back? Not a chance in he**
> after the way you behaved last February and the past two weeks.
>> My last RASCAR experience was a truly disappointing. I was told in so
>> many
>> words that DGF runs RASCAR now and makes the rules weekly, on the fly.
> Complete lie. NO ONE ever told you that I run RASCAR, or that I make the
> rules on the fly (either directly or in so many words). It is run by
> committee. Some of us have administration duties. THE FORUM PROVES THIS.
> Neil and Larry's replies to you in this thread prove this.
> > I show up expecting to run our normal fixed setup race and all of a
> sudden
>> were running Coorsmans wife's, sisters, boyfriends setup and Im fucked
>> along
>> with anyone else that didn't get word.
> You "show up" after little to no participation for a long period of time,
> don't read the forum, don't find things the way you want, and then
> complain. The GROUP decided to try the setups provided from Ullrich
> Kratochwil at www.setup-guru.com It was all in the FORUM. It was VOTED ON
> by the group. It WASN'T even my suggestion. I had one vote.
> >Needless to say I wasnt going to go
>> through this crap weekly and I saw the writing on the wall anyway.
>> Im going to leave the rAS-fACTORserver up and will run Saturday races
>> (along
>> with a few weeknight (tues/thurs) TT shootouts). Hopefully the original
>> RASCAR racers will see through the DGF bullshit and come race where
>> inclusion is the rule not the exception.
> Again, a complete lie. NO ONE has ever been banned from RASCAR.
>> If not rFactor has some very good
>> drivers in the lobby waiting for a good race anyway.
>> Give someone an inch and they take a mile. Typical liberal...
>> As the World Turns ;)
>> Mitch
> RASCAR has had zero arguements over the past year among it's members. Neil
> mentioned this in his reply to you. The only time there was a problem is
> when YOU appeared last February and stirred things up. Since then, not a
> single problem whatsoever. Now, once again, Mitch is trying to invent
> issues for us.
> Again, READ NEIL'S REPLY to you in this thread. Let it sink in. You are
> either a liar, or there's something seriously wrong with you.
> --
> David G Fisher
read more »
Phil
>> 1/ DGF is an all round fine guy. <snip>
>> 2/ Mitch is an all round fine guy. <snip>
>> 3/ DGF & Mitch should duel it out in one off winner takes all race. The
>> rules are simple. Both are supplied with sledge, a Yorkshire Terrier, a
>> bar of Kendle mint cake, a couple of tennis rackets, some woolly undies
>> and a compass. First to the north pole is the categoric winner of this
>> argument, period. A web site will track progress for keen RAS members to
>> follow every few weeks or so (unless there is more pressing news like
>> another public warning on RSC). Should the worst happen we can always
>> run a RASCAR memorial race which would be a nice gesture.
>I go for door number 3 Alex
>Beers and cheers
>(uncle) Goy
>"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
>they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."
>--Our Lord John Cleese--
And a very valid theory at that. Thanks Art ;)
Cheers, uwe
--
GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61