> P.P.S. I believe that Papyrus should try to keep the frame rate up for IndyCar
> II and not the system requirements.
They should of course try, but if that was the only objective with ICR 2.0
it wouldn't make any sense. The physical model will be much more complex
and consequently it will be more demanding on the hardware. ICR 2.0 will also
be much more detailed graphic wise. I will buy a Pentium P6 any time if that's
needed to use ICR 2.0. If I can't afford it, I'll buy ICR2 2.0 and wait for
hardware.
Actually, I don't want ICR 2.0 to run well on my DX2/66 if that means ICR 2.0
will be less complex and wonderful. Anyway in SVGA you can forget about everything
below P90. I wish they would include tons of graphics and new details that would
make it as real as possible. Give me all or nothing.
Don't forget that ICR 1.x is almost two years old, they would be reactionary
in their approach to ICR 2.0 if they didn't make the game more demanding on
the hardware. But again they should spend a lot of time optimizing the code,
which they will for certain.
Actually, if ICR 2.0 comes out before Xmas I'll only study part time the following
semester in order to spend as much time as possible with the sim of my life.
And, yes, I am crazy.
-- Terje Wold Johansen "I am your inferior superior." --
-- Dept. of Informatics --
-- University of Oslo, Norway