rec.autos.simulators

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

Chris Schlette

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Chris Schlette » Tue, 31 Aug 1999 04:00:00

http://www.racesimcentral.net/,3,0-3115,00.html?st.gc.fd.bb1

The GeForce is here and supposed to ship in Sept.  3dfx's "Voodoo4" isn't
out til Xmas.

Kyle Robert

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Kyle Robert » Wed, 01 Sep 1999 04:00:00

The "chip" is shipping to card makers in September. So you will see cards
themselves ship much closer to Xmas. The only punch Nvidia has beat 3dfx to
so far is the press release punch.

Kyle


Kyle Robert

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Kyle Robert » Wed, 01 Sep 1999 04:00:00

The GeForce chips, what a lame name, are shipping in September, not video
cards. You won't see video cards using the chips until much closer to Xmas.
The press release is the only punch Nvidia has beaten 3dfx to so far.

Kyle


Chris

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Chris » Wed, 01 Sep 1999 04:00:00

I highly doubt it.  Manufacturers will already have had reference boards,
"beta" chips, etc just like they did when TNT2 and TNT were released.  It
should be a relatively short turn around for boards to appear.  IF you read
the article, it says "The company expects the boards to be on retail shelves
by the end of September. " meaning that the company already has chips being
sent to manufacturers if its going to see boards on RETAIL shelves.

But nonetheless, its a really really dumb sounding name.


> The GeForce chips, what a lame name, are shipping in September, not video
> cards. You won't see video cards using the chips until much closer to
Xmas.
> The press release is the only punch Nvidia has beaten 3dfx to so far.

> Kyle



> > http://www.gamecenter.com/News/Item/0,3,0-3115,00.html?st.gc.fd.bb1

> > The GeForce is here and supposed to ship in Sept.  3dfx's "Voodoo4"
isn't
> > out til Xmas.

Rolf Hansso

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Rolf Hansso » Thu, 02 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Let me know when they've fixed their OpenGL driver to work with the mirrors
in GPL.....

/ / Rolf


Ronald Stoeh

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Ronald Stoeh » Fri, 03 Sep 1999 04:00:00


> http://www.gamecenter.com/News/Item/0,3,0-3115,00.html?st.gc.fd.bb1

> The GeForce is here and supposed to ship in Sept.  3dfx's "Voodoo4" isn't
> out til Xmas.

I'm able to wait for the better product... ;^)

l8er
ronny

--
"I heard if you play the NT-4.0-CD backwards, you get a satanic
message."
"That's nothing, if you play it forward, it installs NT-4.0"

Meij

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Meij » Fri, 03 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Well unless 3Dfx pull their fingers out of their arses and provide good
image quality and 32-bit colour then you don't have to, GeForce256 is the
better one. 3Dfx need to stop resting on their laurels and make a good
card that offers tomorrows tech because all the current ones do is offer
the same old same old but faster

M




>> http://www.gamecenter.com/News/Item/0,3,0-3115,00.html?st.gc.fd.bb1

>> The GeForce is here and supposed to ship in Sept.  3dfx's "Voodoo4"
>> isn't out til Xmas.

>I'm able to wait for the better product... ;^)

>l8er
>ronny

djc..

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by djc.. » Sat, 04 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Don't put the cart before the horse, my friend. =)  You don't even
*know* what specs are for the Voodoo4 card(besides T-buffering).
But from the looks of it, right now, 3dfx is out for *** this time.
I've got a hunch that *that* is why they are waiting until after nVidia
has released it's "Gefarce" card. =)

Dan



> Well unless 3Dfx pull their fingers out of their arses and provide
good
> image quality and 32-bit colour then you don't have to, GeForce256 is
the
> better one. 3Dfx need to stop resting on their laurels and make a good
> card that offers tomorrows tech because all the current ones do is
offer
> the same old same old but faster

> M




> >> http://www.racesimcentral.net/,3,0-3115,00.html?st.gc.fd.bb1

> >> The GeForce is here and supposed to ship in Sept.  3dfx's "Voodoo4"
> >> isn't out til Xmas.

> >I'm able to wait for the better product... ;^)

> >l8er
> >ronny

Sent via Deja.com http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Meij

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Meij » Sat, 04 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Well I'm going on the last 2 generations of 3Dfx hardware. If you can spot
anything other than increased performance of essentially the same old piece
of kit then I'll be surprised. nVidia on the other hand have continually
raised the bar with each card they release. As you rightly say, we know
nothing about the Voodoo 4 yet but what we do know about the GeForce256
makes it sound like an excellent card.

Incidentally, here's what Carmack had to say about it:
"Nvidia's new geometry accelerated card with the funny name.
It is fast. Very, very fast. It has the highest fill rate of any card we
have ever tested, has improved image quality over TNT2, and it gives
timedemo scores 40% faster than the next closest score with extremely raw
beta drivers. The throughput will definately improve even more as their
drivers mature.For max framerates in OpenGL games, this card is going to be
very hard to beat. "

I suspect he knows what he's talking about.

Anyway, my point was unless 3Dfx change their previous gameplan of "same
deal but faster" they're going to start losing out.

M


Ronald Stoeh

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Ronald Stoeh » Sat, 04 Sep 1999 04:00:00


> Well unless 3Dfx pull their fingers out of their arses and provide good
> image quality and 32-bit colour then you don't have to, GeForce256 is the
> better one. 3Dfx need to stop resting on their laurels and make a good
> card that offers tomorrows tech because all the current ones do is offer
> the same old same old but faster

I don't need tomorrows tech, I prefer today's tech that runs my current
AND older software the best. This was true with three generations of
3dfx cards
now, and I'm quite sure, the fourth will do the same for me...

l8er
ronny

--
"I heard if you play the NT-4.0-CD backwards, you get a satanic
message."
"That's nothing, if you play it forward, it installs NT-4.0"

Meij

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Meij » Sat, 04 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Typical head in the sand attitude. The games that make use of Voodoo 3 and
provide a noticable improvement over Voodoo 2 SLI setup (which is now much
cheaper than the upper end of the V3 range) generally all also support D3D
and OpenGL and thus the next generation chipsets from nVidia, PCLabs etc.

If 3Dfx make a good bit of kit that will keep people going for the future
then great, but without at least 32-bit colour AND better image quality,
they're going to be left on the shelf.

M



Alex Pavlof

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Alex Pavlof » Sat, 04 Sep 1999 04:00:00


The ability to push pretty pixels alone a hot seller does not make.

However, these video card wars sure keep those hostile ***agers
inside posting imflammatory messages about video cards that they only
know about through press releases and hype.

I'm telling you, whoever came up with the idea of harnessing the vast
hordes of the internet as a PR device had better be making a fat
sum...  

Did 3dfx start this?  Nvidia?  Rendition?  Who?

--

       Gamer / Programmer        
    But not a Game Programmer    

djc..

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by djc.. » Sun, 05 Sep 1999 04:00:00

You have a point there. =)  But in Scott Seller's(of 3dfx, but you
prolly already know that ;) interview yesterday, it sure sounded like
the Voodoo4--or whatever they're gonna call it--will be much, much more
than just a "juiced up Voodoo3".

He hinted texture compression,  along with the already announced T-
buffering, and whole slew of features that he "can't talk about until
next week".  And yes, it *will* finally support 32-bit rendering!!!  He
also sounds extremely confident that 3dfx's upcoming product will "blow
away" the GeeWhiz--or Gefarce, or whatever that nVidia card is called--
and shock the world. ;)  Should be exiting!!

regards,
Dan



> Well I'm going on the last 2 generations of 3Dfx hardware. If you can
spot
> anything other than increased performance of essentially the same old
piece
> of kit then I'll be surprised. nVidia on the other hand have
continually
> raised the bar with each card they release. As you rightly say, we
know
> nothing about the Voodoo 4 yet but what we do know about the
GeForce256
> makes it sound like an excellent card.

> Incidentally, here's what Carmack had to say about it:
> "Nvidia's new geometry accelerated card with the funny name.
> It is fast. Very, very fast. It has the highest fill rate of any card
we
> have ever tested, has improved image quality over TNT2, and it gives
> timedemo scores 40% faster than the next closest score with extremely
raw
> beta drivers. The throughput will definately improve even more as
their
> drivers mature.For max framerates in OpenGL games, this card is going
to be
> very hard to beat. "

> I suspect he knows what he's talking about.

> Anyway, my point was unless 3Dfx change their previous gameplan
of "same
> deal but faster" they're going to start losing out.

> M


> >Don't put the cart before the horse, my friend. =)  You don't even
> >*know* what specs are for the Voodoo4 card(besides T-buffering).
> >But from the looks of it, right now, 3dfx is out for *** this time.
> >I've got a hunch that *that* is why they are waiting until after
nVidia
> >has released it's "Gefarce" card. =)

> >Dan

Sent via Deja.com http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Alex Pavlof

Nvidia beats 3dfx to the punch

by Alex Pavlof » Wed, 08 Sep 1999 04:00:00



And I can usually wait 2-3 months, until I can buy the better product
for a lot cheaper.

--

       Gamer / Programmer        
    But not a Game Programmer    


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.