rec.autos.simulators

> Shane

> > Shane.

> > The difference is mate, that this is no private funeral or gathering
where
> > mates know each other intimately. It is a worldwide public forum, where
> > absolutely anybody can walk in. As I said in a previous post, a relative
> of
> > one of those dead pilots lives a few streets down from me. What if that
> guy
> > was the brother of one of the correspondants in here?

> > Taking your analogy further, If you was burying a member of your family
> and
> > a stranger walked into the boneyard and started making wisecracks whilst
> the
> > women were weeping over the grave......OK I'm taking it to extremes here
> > but...............

> > As well of your famed and legendary humour, I  hear you Aussies can get
a
> > bit punch happy from time to time as well..

> > MS


> > > ppl deal with tragedies in different ways. As an aussie Bruce you know
> > that
> > > as a group we tend to take the***out of any situation

> Concerning Monty Python's, well, they did not use recent situations,
rather
> they were more global. Example: Making fun of disabled is a big thread in
> their repertoire, I wouldn't be surprised if 90% wouldn't find *that*
> funny.......

> Bruce, can we agree on the fact that in my original post I was simply
> drawing a little sarcastic note concerning Formula One using the word
> "wings" as the clue-word? With no intention to hurt the feelings of any1?
> Yes, I *do* get it, but it seems you don't wanna switch viewpoints (or at
> least try to understand them.......)

> BTW, I heard that "joke" on a radio-station.....shall we sue them? :))
> cya
> Maaki

> --
> ________________________________
> Check out my home once in a while:
> http://www.maaki.de.vu
> ........still a lot of work to be done
> ________________________________


> > You ask if you were you "wise-cracking"?
> > Yes....of course you were.  You made comments that you considered funny,
> > Markus, about a situation that wasn't.  The perfect example of a
> > "wisecrack".

> > Monty Python is certainly tasteless in a lot of instances (the fat guy
> > exploding in "The Meaning of Life", for example.  I recall quite vividly
> > several Japanese gentlemen getting up and walking out of a sales seminar
> > when that was shown whilst we were having after-dinner coffee!) but I
> don't
> > recall ever seeing, hearing or reading any of their scripts that made
fun
> of
> > a recent situation involving fatalities.

> > You really just don't get it, do you?

> Hey Bruce, this one is not bad either :-))

> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> --
> The Drongo formely known as Poopy Face

> "Suck & *** & cook & clean,
>  baby you know what I mean!"

>> Hi Bruce

>> What more do you what him to say? Or do you just enjoy hounding people? I
>do
>> agree with you BTW, in the most part, but I can't see the point in going
>on
>> and on and on about it

> As far as sueing anyone is concerned, that's up to you....assuming that
the
> station was German, of course.

> Insofar as Monty Python sketches about the disabled being a "big thread",
I
> really can't say.....the only one that comes readily to mind is the knight
> in "Search for the Holy Grail", although I'm sure that there were other
> examples.

> We can agree that in your original post that you were being sarcastic
about
> wings in Formula One, certainly.  It won't, however, change my opinion
that
> you were being insensitive in what you wrote.  And it's not that I either
> don't want to switch viewpoints or try to understand them.  From where I
sit
> there isn't any alternative viewpoint.
> --
> Regards,
> Bruce Kennewell,
> Canberra, Australia.
> ---------------------------

> > I believed "wisecrack" is a person who always knows everything better,
> > correct me if I'm wrong.

> > Concerning Monty Python's, well, they did not use recent situations,
> rather
> > they were more global. Example: Making fun of disabled is a big thread
in
> > their repertoire, I wouldn't be surprised if 90% wouldn't find *that*
> > funny.......

> > Bruce, can we agree on the fact that in my original post I was simply
> > drawing a little sarcastic note concerning Formula One using the word
> > "wings" as the clue-word? With no intention to hurt the feelings of
any1?
> > Yes, I *do* get it, but it seems you don't wanna switch viewpoints (or
at
> > least try to understand them.......)

> > BTW, I heard that "joke" on a radio-station.....shall we sue them? :))
> > cya
> > Maaki

> > --
> > ________________________________
> > Check out my home once in a while:
> > http://www.maaki.de.vu
> > ........still a lot of work to be done
> > ________________________________


> > > You ask if you were you "wise-cracking"?
> > > Yes....of course you were.  You made comments that you considered
funny,
> > > Markus, about a situation that wasn't.  The perfect example of a
> > > "wisecrack".

> > > Monty Python is certainly tasteless in a lot of instances (the fat guy
> > > exploding in "The Meaning of Life", for example.  I recall quite
vividly
> > > several Japanese gentlemen getting up and walking out of a sales
seminar
> > > when that was shown whilst we were having after-dinner coffee!) but I
> > don't
> > > recall ever seeing, hearing or reading any of their scripts that made
> fun
> > of
> > > a recent situation involving fatalities.

> > > You really just don't get it, do you?

>cya
>Maaki

>--
>________________________________
>Check out my home once in a while:
>http://www.maaki.de.vu
>........still a lot of work to be done
>________________________________


>> My favorite Python routine was the twit Olympics. Twits gad to do things
>> like jump over matchboxes and the like. Of course, you have to have a
>sense
>> of humor to enjoy stuff like that.