rec.autos.simulators

Prediction

Jet Jagu

Prediction

by Jet Jagu » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00





>>you know, that whole "10% of our brains" thing is a complete myth. just
>>thought you'd like to know.

>[snip]

>I don't buy that for a second!

>Do you honestly believe that we, as humans, use our brains to the full
>capacity?

>It sure will be a disapointment to many if it turns out to be true!

Well, the 10% thing is a myth.  You can read about it here:

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

But to summarize, the 10% thing stems from a misinterpretation of
terminology by laypersons.  Basically, we only use 10% of our brains
for motor and sensory functions, the remaining 90% is used for things
like language and abstract thought.

---
Jet Jaguar
I have a spam blocking address.  Replying to me is like pulling teeth.
Visit my crappy home page at http://www.racesimcentral.net/~chmilnir/
MSTie #54297

The suspense is terrible. I hope it will last.

ymenar

Prediction

by ymenar » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00


"You have still much to learn my young Padawan".

Your Midi-chlorian rate might be high, but if you would use the Force you
would know that Geoff Crammond is still in his private island in Hawaii
spending his million of dollars from Gp2/no post-product support    ;-)

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
-- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
-- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
-- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
-- May the Downforce be with you...

"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

Thom j

Prediction

by Thom j » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00

This is a good one Phil ;0)...Touch
Cheers Thom_j.



Thom j

Prediction

by Thom j » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00

Well Mark; I read what you say but there is no definitive proof in your
comments Grad student or not! I will not go into my graduate degrees
as it is un-important but you are still speaking via conjecture!
This subect has been studied for hundreds of years with no facts! Yes
your points are available but not facts! Both medicine & science have
many years of more study to go. This is still my imho' & it is the same
for you!
"sheesh. nothing to back it, my ass.." Somewhat shallow & crude for
an alleged educated individual. Don't you think?
Cheers Thom_j. aka Mr imho..
P.S. In regards to"electroencephalography" You're not the only one
who has read/studied this. Remember you never know who you are
talking too or challenging!


Swindell

Prediction

by Swindell » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00

LOL! Could be... we'll see in 12 weeks time.

Rob
------
ONE Human Race.
ONE IndyCar Series.

The Excelsi

Prediction

by The Excelsi » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00



That's the problem. You can not put science behind something like this
How are scientists honestly expected to know what our minds are
capable of? If we knew that, we'd already be at our limit!

This is in not way to offend you. It's simply my opinion, but quite a
strong one at that.

:-)

The Excelsior


Mark Stah

Prediction

by Mark Stah » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00

haha. ok, thom- i'll remove 90% of your brain and see how you do. i'll even
let you pick the 10% you keep.
will that be enough proof for you? it'll be a well documented experiment, i
promise!

what a joke.... i was just trying to do my little part to dispel one of
those myths you hear all the time. sorry i said anything.

an alleged educated individual. Don't you think?>>

no, not really. oh, and it would be "allegedely educated". a natural
response in a relaxed and informal forum to being told that a huge mountain
of easily cited scientific evidence doesn't actually exist. (what
elephant?... oh- *that* elephant :) )

you get back to me about that experiment, ok?

mark

Mark Stah

Prediction

by Mark Stah » Mon, 07 Jun 1999 04:00:00

excelsior-
well, it depends on how someone means "uses 10%". if you mean that people
only remember a small percentage of what they could, have the capacity to be
more intelligent (better at pattern recognition, logic or something), or
even be somehow more emotionally intuitive- it may be true that most people
don't work up to their capacity. And there may be something to that-
although the 10% thing seems completely arbitrary. Either way, that's a
difficult thing to measure and a shaky assertion at best. (although it seems
people actually remember lots more than they consciously recall... another
topic). i think this is the idea you're getting at, and i'd agree with you
to a point.

If you somehow mean that only 10% of the physical mass of the brain is used-
well, that's ridiculous and can be easily disproven (and has been, in many
well-documented experiments). some folks actually think this because of the
oft-quoted figure.

i've heard of the 10% thing being used to defend the possibility of psychic
powers or telepathy. i think the original poster made reference to it in
this context (though he seemed to be sort of half-joking). There's no
evidence for anything like this, of course- but one should never say
never....

the 10% thing was just totally made up to make people feel better about
themselves, i suppose. but even if the message behind it has some truth
(that people have more potential than they use), the 10% figure was just
thrown in there to make the assertion sound like somebody measured it. all
i'm trying to say is that no one ever has, and so the specific 10% assertion
with which we are all familiar is a popular-culture myth (yes, it's included
in that urban-legend listing right alongside the kidney-stealing thing and
the HIV-infected needles in pay phone change returns)- and nothing more.

i still think GP3 will be out later than september....

John Bod

Prediction

by John Bod » Tue, 08 Jun 1999 04:00:00



It could be worse, Mark -- you could also be an IRL fan! <G>

;-)

-- JB

Marko Viitane

Prediction

by Marko Viitane » Tue, 08 Jun 1999 04:00:00

I had GP2 many months ago...or years ago...

I'm looking forward to buy GP3. GP3.

Is there echo in your mail reader?, echo...in yo..echo..

Best Records
Marko Viitanen

SwindellsR kirjoitti viestiss?

Thom j

Prediction

by Thom j » Tue, 08 Jun 1999 04:00:00

Excelsior; Your point is "Spot-on" and it appears Mark would rather
advertise his intelligence by announcing his "grad student status" as if
this will make somekind of difference.
My student days are over & all my grad degrees are completed. I'll
waste no more space on r.a.s. since this is off topic. If you still have
any rebuttals or comments; please send directly to Mark, myself or
any other posts to continue this "non-sim" discussion....Tia
Cheers Thom_j.




> >thom j. is welcome to express his (very) humble opinion, but i did
mention
> >that i'm a grad student in neuropathology and could be expected to know
> >something as elementary as that. it's not really the kind of thing you
"have
> >an opinion" on; many studies have verified it as a fact. i don't think
it's
> >appropriate to get into why in this ng- although you seemed to want some
> >facts to back up what i said.
> >do a medline search on "electroencephalography" for a start. that urban
> >legends page is pretty interesting and entertaining, too- and appropriate
> >for soemone who only wants to use 10% of his brain :P

> >sheesh. nothing to back it, my ass....

> >well, back to sim racing.....

> That's the problem. You can not put science behind something like this
> How are scientists honestly expected to know what our minds are
> capable of? If we knew that, we'd already be at our limit!

> This is in not way to offend you. It's simply my opinion, but quite a
> strong one at that.

> :-)

> The Excelsior

> "There once was a dog who entered a kitchen and stole a piece of meat. The

Chef shot the dog. The owner of the dog came and buried the dog, and on its
of meat. The Chef shot the dog. The owner of the dog came and buried the

and stole a piece of meat. The Chef shot the dog. The owner of the dog came
and buried the dog, and on its grave he wrote... You get the idea!"
Thom j

Prediction

by Thom j » Tue, 08 Jun 1999 04:00:00

As stated in my previous post; I will not continue this discussion
as it wastes good space on R.A.S. being off topic.. Also I need
no english lessons as I usually write in informal form on all {ngs}
You are now showing your immaturity! If you'd like to continue
{imho} this worthless discussion do not do it here. Please send
to me directly {notice the 'ly' at the end . happy?}


Daxe Rexfor

Prediction

by Daxe Rexfor » Tue, 08 Jun 1999 04:00:00


If you aren't going to continue, why are you writing in AGAIN to tell us you
aren't going to continue?  What's next?  A post that says, "As I previously
stated in a post about previously stating my intent not to continue, I intend
not to continue.."

~daxe

  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----

Eldre

Prediction

by Eldre » Sat, 12 Jun 1999 04:00:00


(Killer Diller) writes:


>>Grand Prix Three will be released in 12 weeks time

>>I don't have any kind of inside info, it's just a feeling. The human mind is
>>very powerful, especially mine :

>Consider the source AOL =   ***
>                                                        On
>                                                        Line

If you don't agree with him, fine.  There's no need to get abusive...

__

Put your message in a modem, and throw it in the ***-sea...
remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Eldre

Prediction

by Eldre » Sat, 12 Jun 1999 04:00:00




>> As stated in my previous post; I will not continue this discussion
>> as it wastes good space on R.A.S. being off topic..

>If you aren't going to continue, why are you writing in AGAIN to tell us you
>aren't going to continue?  What's next?  A post that says, "As I previously
>stated in a post about previously stating my intent not to continue, I intend
>not to continue.."

>~daxe

As Bugs Bunny would say - "shut up shuttin' up..."

Sorry, that line just popped into my head... :-)

__

Put your message in a modem, and throw it in the ***-sea...
remove SPAM-OFF to reply.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.