>>You could take another approach, which is based on The Lap. This means
>>you take the Papyrus benchmark lap times and normalize these lap times
>>(to say 100%). Any track will do, it's the proportion between the lap
>>times of the tracks.
...
>Sorry Ruud, but your not seeing the beauty(IMHO)of the scale.
...
>You cannot compare the 3.573 miles of Monza to 3.573 miles of the Ring. Why?
>One word: TURNS. Although the Ring is 29% of the distance of the 48 mile long
>GPL lap, it makes up 56.86% of the 306 total turns in GPL !
Ok, sounds good. :)
Actually, I'm pleased of the scale right now, because I have a chance
of going up in the rankings, since my best time on the Ring is still a
whopping 9:40, even worse than Eldred (sorry 'bout that haha, but he's
a nice benchmark for some drivers), so I should still be able to find
a minute or so (not crashing for one). Perhaps I should try the Cooper
or something other non-Lotus car to be able to drive a bit more
relaxed, rather than constantly on the edge and often overdoing it.
BTW I wasn't saying your scale was BAD, just that there were 2 ways.
But I guess people who dislike the Ring probably dislike the fact that
there are so MANY turns which makes it hard. And the length of 1 lap,
perhaps. So a scale which includes 'liking a track' would not be that
bad. But ok, looking at GPL as 1 big track is an ok view.
I really really like GPLRank btw, it's absolutely an incentive to do
better!! And to actually see how good or bad you are compared to the
world. No more all Schumachers.
Ruud van Gaal
MarketGraph / MachTech: http://www.marketgraph.nl
Art: http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery