rec.autos.simulators

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

Bj.O.r

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by Bj.O.r » Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:00:00

No, it's my paradise..  I'm down to 6.04 thanks to the ring:-) I absolutely
suck at every other track, GPLRank will eventually make me go back to other
tracks, but I find them too boring after mastering the big one :-)

--
/Bj.O.rn, SDK #1225

Eldre

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by Eldre » Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:00:00


writes:

Bryon, where have YOU been? :)

Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +85.99

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Andrew MacPhers

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by Andrew MacPhers » Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:00:00

The main attraction of GPLR as I see it is that it's totally transparent
to the user. No messy maths, just a simple system everyone can understand
and check for themselves easily.

Andrew McP

David

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by David » Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:00:00

[This is still me, David Buttery - I'm having to post via Remarq
as my newsreader is being awkward.]

Right, having read all the messages in this thread, and having
given them my full and univided attention (except while watching
the highlights of Spain v Yugoslavia - what a game!), my
considered and calculated opinion is this:

GPLRank is *great* I love it!

Got questions?  Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com

Bryon Lap

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by Bryon Lap » Fri, 23 Jun 2000 04:00:00

Suffering from the lack of ICR3........

ANd now if I could only remember the name of the guy who was my biggest opponent
here....he ran a "racing" league on his own using ICR1....had long hair...worked
at a uni....had a good looking wife and pics of her on his website.....great guy
though......



> writes:

> >All this talk about the Ring reminds of when I suggested in the newgroup
> >several
> >years ago that ICR1 really needed a track editor.  Someone joked about that
> >if one
> >was available, someone would try to make The Ring....now a game has it.  Is
> >it the
> >full course?

> Bryon, where have YOU been? :)

> Eldred
> --
> Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
> Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> GPL hcp. +85.99

> Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
> with experience...
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Ruud van Ga

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by Ruud van Ga » Sat, 24 Jun 2000 04:00:00





>>You could take another approach, which is based on The Lap. This means
>>you take the Papyrus benchmark lap times and normalize these lap times
>>(to say 100%). Any track will do, it's the proportion between the lap
>>times of the tracks.
...
>Sorry Ruud, but your not seeing the beauty(IMHO)of the scale.
...
>You cannot compare the 3.573 miles of Monza to 3.573 miles of the Ring. Why?
>One word: TURNS. Although the Ring is 29% of the distance of the 48 mile long
>GPL lap, it makes up 56.86% of the 306 total turns in GPL !

Ok, sounds good. :)
Actually, I'm pleased of the scale right now, because I have a chance
of going up in the rankings, since my best time on the Ring is still a
whopping 9:40, even worse than Eldred (sorry 'bout that haha, but he's
a nice benchmark for some drivers), so I should still be able to find
a minute or so (not crashing for one). Perhaps I should try the Cooper
or something other non-Lotus car to be able to drive a bit more
relaxed, rather than constantly on the edge and often overdoing it.
BTW I wasn't saying your scale was BAD, just that there were 2 ways.
But I guess people who dislike the Ring probably dislike the fact that
there are so MANY turns which makes it hard. And the length of 1 lap,
perhaps. So a scale which includes 'liking a track' would not be that
bad. But ok, looking at GPL as 1 big track is an ok view.
I really really like GPLRank btw, it's absolutely an incentive to do
better!! And to actually see how good or bad you are compared to the
world. No more all Schumachers.

Ruud van Gaal
MarketGraph / MachTech: http://www.marketgraph.nl
Art: http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery

David Butte

GPLRank - more Ring controversy :-)

by David Butte » Sat, 24 Jun 2000 04:00:00


<snip>
<snip>

The Brabham works very well at the Ring with a halfway decent setup.
And my PB (8:58 ish) is in the Ferrari, which is also surprisingly god,
though I found I had to set it up more carefully than the Brabham.

--
David. (GPLRank handicap: +39.92)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.